---

---

---

---

---

目录 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap2_html 2009年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap3_html 2008年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap4_html 2007年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap5_html 2006年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap6_html 2005年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap7_html 2004年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2009年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2008年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2007年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2006年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题试题编号：326 试题名称：基础英语 注意：答题（含填空）一律答在答题纸上，答在草稿纸或试卷上一律无效试 卷 一Part I Reading Comprehension (two points each ,40 points)Directions: In this section there are four passages followed by twenty multiple-choices. Read the passages carefully and then mark your answer in your Answer Sheet. Text A “Partnership” between government and private business is much in vogue. Bill Clinton, for one, is all for it. Government should not seek to displace private enterprise, he says, but strive to help it work better. And government has much to learn from business: if bureaucracies can be confronted with some of the incentives and disciplines that work in the private sector, they too can become more efficient.Britains Conservative government has said similar things for years-admittedly, with more emphasis on what government learn from private enterprise than on what the state can do for business. So widely has this notion of partnership spread that Britains Labour Party, which has traditionally seen the private sector as an obstacle to success, is suddenly an enthusiastic believer. It has published a document on “promoting a partnership between public and private finance”, arguing that private capital should be used, to an even greater extent than already envisaged by the Tory government, to pay for investment in public infrastructurewhich, in the Labour Partys view, means not merely roads and bridges but also “social infrastructure” such as “Child care facilities.”In Britain, as in America and many other industrial countries, this particular form of partnership-the use of private capital for public investmentis proving especially beguiling. Unfortunately, this is so mainly for bad reasons. Before a suspiciously broad consensus moves too far from speech-making to action, and a policy that seems to offer something to everyone goes wrong, some careful thinking is called for.The main bad reason for proposing this new financial partnership is that it makes for convenient bookkeeping-so much so that all sorts of apparently worthwhile investments start to look costless. The argument, at its crudest, goes as follows. The country plainly needs a new road. The government could build it-but how would it meet the cost? Higher taxes would be unpopular. That leaves borrowing. There are 、good reasons to pay for an investment-which yields its benefits over many years-by borrowing over a span of time. But another difficulty arises: most industrial-country governments are already borrowing too much. The governments of Britain and America are both struggling to cut their financial defic、its. Adding to public borrowing looks out of the question. The solution seems obvious: let private finance meet the cost. That way, public borrowing does not rise. A needed investment goes ahead. Banks and other private lenders win new business. The construction and child-care industries take on new

---

---

---

---

• 石化油直销考试
• 湖北安全生产知识竞赛
• 现代船舶维修考试
• 机械检查工
• 语言文字学
• 海南住院医师口腔内科
• 其它
• 动环监控考试
• 精算管理
• 其他
• 内蒙古住院医师妇产科
• 垃圾吊司机考试
• 流行病及卫生应急知识竞赛
• 建筑安全管理人员
• 高校实验室安全考试
• 中医临床三基(药师)
• 携程旅游定制师知识
• 海南住院医师核医学科
• 工商银行营业经理考试
• 03335公共管理学