The master is not bound to show in the bill of lading ______ of the goods shipped on board his vessel．A.the number of packagesB.the number of weightC.both the number of packages and of the weightD.neither the number of the packages nor of the weight

The person who signs the bill of lading without the authority of the Shipowner stating that goods have been shipped，and they have in fact not been shipped at all，______ liable to an indorsee of the bill of lading，who has relied on that statement，for damages for breach of warranty of authority．

A.have

B.has

C.are

D.is

In the case of the leading marks，the master may ______ to show these in the bill of lading if the goods or their containers are not clearly marked in such a manner as should ordinarily remain legible until the end of the voyage．

A.confuse

B.excuse

C.defuse

D.refuse

Where goods are shipped under a bill of lading and the Charterer of the vessel is named as consignee，the Charterer，if he indorses the bill of lading to a third party，has no claim for substantial damages against the shipowners in respect of the loss of the goods for he has no ______ interest in them．

A.prospective

B.preliminary

C.proprietory

D.temporary

材料：

When a clean bill of lading has been issued，estoppel arises or，in other words，the carrier is prevented from proving，as against a third party relying on the clean bill of lading，that there was any thing wrong．In the case of inherent vice，however，which is a natural defect in the thing shipped，the carrier is not estopped by his clean bill of lading，because a clean bill of lading，in stating that a certain cargo is on board，gives sufficient notice that this cargo，in the natural course of events，may have certain qualities or defects which all similar cargo normally has．For example，a cargo of flour will shrink slightly，and this fact does not have to be noted on the face of the bill of lading．

Similarly，where cargo is unfit to withstand the ordinary incidents of the contractual voyage contemplated by the parties，owing to some inherent vice or hidden defect presented within it，the carrier is not estopped by the clean bill of lading from asserting the inherent defect exception，provided that the damage has not been aggravated by any conduct of the carrier or those for whom he is responsible．

The carrier issuing a clean bill of lading is only bound by his statements as to the outward condition of the cargo and is therefore not estopped from proving inherent vice or hidden defect when that vice or defect was not apparent at the time of shipment．In other words，a clean bill of lading does not necessarily fulfill the shipper&39;s burden of proof in respect to inherent vice or hidden defect．

问题：

The slight shrinkage of flour is ________．

A.an inherent defect of the cargo

B.a damage which is always aggravated by the conduct of carrier

C.a vice or defect which should be noted on face of B/L due to the fact that it is not apparent at the time of shipment

D.an outward condition of the cargo

The carrier issuing a clean bill of lading will only be bound by ________．A.any thing wrong in the natural course of events

B.the conduct of the carrier or those for whom he is responsible

C.inherent vice or hidden defect presented within the cargo

D.the apparent order and condition of the cargo

Of the following，________ in the cargo shipped on board his vessel should be considered as a thing that will give rise to estoppel on the part of the carrier．A.ordinary incident

B.hidden defect

C.inherent vice

D.inherent defect

It is concluded that on issuing a clean bill of lading，the carrier ________．A.indicates that the cargo is unfit to withstand the ordinary incidents of the contractual voyage contemplated by the parties

B.gives sufficient notice that this cargo has no defects which all similar cargo normally has

C.will be prevented from proving there is any natural defect in the thing shipped

D.will not be estopped from proving inherent vice or hidden defect when that vice or defect was not apparent at the time of shipment

请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！