EBGP peers advertise MED and change Next Hop.
EBGP peers advertise Local Preference and do NOT change Next Hop.
Confederation BGP peers advertise MED and do NOT change Next Hop.
Confederation BGP peers advertise Local Preference and change Next Hop.
第1题:
During BGP configuration on a router that has peered with other BGP speakers, the BGP command aggregate-a ddress 172.32.0.0 255.255.252.0 is issued. However, the peers do not receive this aggregate network in BGP advertisements. Also, the router does not have this aggregate network in its BGP table.Which option indicates a possible reason this command did not cause the router to advertise the aggregate network to its peers?()
A. Interface NULL 0 is likely shutdown.
B. The next hop IP address must be a loopback address.
C. The BGP command no auto - summary is missing.
D. The BGP command no synchronization is missing.
E. Subnets of 172.32.0.0/22 do not exist in the BGP table.
F. The IGP running on this router does not have network 172.32.0.0/22 installed.
第2题:
Which two statements describe the default routing policy for BGP?()
第3题:
Which types of prefixes will a router running BGP most likely advertise to an IBGP peer, assuming it is not configured as a route reflector?()
第4题:
BGP Routes with which community will not advertise to any peers?
第5题:
Which three statements about the BGP next-hop attribute are true? ()
第6题:
Which two statements are true regarding EBGP and Confederation BGP?() (Choose two.)
第7题:
You receive an EBGP route configured with the no-export community set.To which types of peers can you send this route?() (Choose two.)
第8题:
EBGP sessions between confederation sub ASs do not modify the next-hop attribute.
By default, iBGP sessions change the next-hop attribute learned from eBGP peers to self address.
By default, the next-hop attribute is not changed when a prefix is reflected by the route reflector
EBGP sessions between confederation sub ASs change the next-hop attribute to peer address.
By default, iBGP sessions preserve the next-hop attribute learned from eBGP peers.
第9题:
prefixes received from any other BGP peer and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
all prefixes in its routing table
prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
prefixes received from other IBGP peers, prefixes received from EBGP peers, and prefixes redistributed to BGP
prefixes received from other IBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
第10题:
prefixes received from any other BGP peer and prefixes locally originated via networkstatements or redistributed
all prefixes in its routing table
prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
prefixes received from other IBGP peers, prefixes received from EBGP peers,and prefixes redistributed to BGP
prefixes received from other IBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
第11题:
prefixes received from any other BGP peer and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
all prefixes in its routing table
prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
prefixes received from other IBGP peers, prefixes received from EBGP peers,and prefixes redistributedto BGP
prefixes received from other IBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
第12题:
EBGP peers advertise MED and change Next Hop.
EBGP peers advertise Local Preference and do NOT change Next Hop.
Confederation BGP peers advertise MED and do NOT change Next Hop.
Confederation BGP peers advertise Local Preference and change Next Hop.
第13题:
Which of these best identifies the types of prefixes a router running BGP will advertise to an EBGP peer? ()
第14题:
Which two statements accurately describe an IBGP peering session?() (Choose two.)
第15题:
What action will a BGP route reflector take when it receives a prefix marked with the community attribute NO ADVERTISE from a client peer?()
第16题:
Which of these best identifies the types of prefixes a router running BGP will advertise to an EBGP peer?()
第17题:
Which types of prefixes will a router running BGP most likely advertise to an IBGP peer, assuming it is notconfigured as a route reflector?()
第18题:
By default, to which peers will a BGP router advertise routes learned from IBGP peers?()
第19题:
第20题:
no BGP peers
all I-BGP peers
all E-BGP peers within your global AS
all E-BGP peers outside your global AS
第21题:
It will advertise the prefix to all other client peers and non-client peers.
It will not advertise the prefix to EBGP peers.
It will only advertise the prefix to all other IBGP peers.
It will not advertise the prefix to any peers.
第22题:
iBGB dual horning with different iSPs puts the Enterprise at the risk of becoming a transitnetwork
iBGP requires a full mesh of eBGP peers
Routers will not advertise iBGP learned routers to other iBGP peers.
The use of route reflections or Confederation eliminate any full mesh requirement while helpingto scale iBGP
iGBP peers do not add any information to the AS path
第23题:
prefixes received from any other BGP peer and prefixes locally originated via networkstatements or redistributed to BGP
all prefixes in its IP routing table
only prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
only prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
all prefixes in its routing table except the prefixes received from other EBGP peers
all prefixes in its routing table except the prefixes received from other IBGP peers
第24题:
prefixes received from any other BGP peer and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed to BGP
all prefixes in its IP routing table
only prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes locally originated via network statements or redistributed
only prefixes received from EBGP peers and prefixes received from route reflectors
all prefixes in its routing table except the prefixes received from other EBGP peers
all prefixes in its routing table except the prefixes received from other IBGP peers