问答题Wealthy people, however, could afford to travel to sunny countries.
题目
问答题
Wealthy people, however, could afford to travel to sunny countries.
相似考题
更多“Wealthy people, however, could afford to travel to sunny cou”相关问题
-
第1题：
Passage One
Long time ago, the ancient people could not travel to any far away places for they had no vehicle to carry them across the wide oceans, deep valleys, long rivers or high mountains.
Nowadays people take advantage of steamships, trains, airplanes and modern bridges. Airplanes can carry us to the far countries in a short time; steamships can travel across the wide oceans. It is convenient to the modern people.
Travelling is a good idea to us because we can get more knowledge, such as the customs, the geography of other countries. And people could travel among the different countries in the world. For it is easy to travel from the land by trains, or from the sea by ships.
We learnt that the Italian who made the world large was Mr. Columbus. He was a brave man. Up to the middle of the 15th century, the people were afraid of traveling because they believed it was a dangerous thing.
There is a saying in China, which is "Travelling for thousands is better than reading for ten years." It is to say that we can learn more in different places than we can learn from books.
36. The people in ancient times couldn't travel too far away places because______.
A. they found it no use doing so
B. they liked staying at home
C. there was no modern transportation
D. they were forbidden to go to other countries
正确答案：C此题为细节题。见在第一段内the ancient people could not travel to any faraway places for they had no instruments说明古人出游不能离家太远作长途旅行的原因；没有现代的交通工具。
-
第2题：
Young people in China now_______to travel often.A.drive
B.drives
C.drove
答案：B -
第3题：
Since the beginning of history, people have___ travel.A、dreamed
B、dreamed for
C、dreamed of
D、dreamed with
正确答案:C
-
第4题：
A car ___something that ordinary people afford a few years ago.参考答案：was thought of as
-
第5题：
请阅读短文。
Do who choose to go on exotic, far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel? And even if they pay, who ensures that they get good, up-to-date information? Who, for that matter, should collect that information in the first place? For a variety of reasons, travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants. As a result, many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.
Why is travel medicine so unloved? Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travellers, this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness, jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home, but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.
Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take."The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health, says Ron Behrens, the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London." Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for? It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role, he says.
To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.
A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued. "Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control. Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily- run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security."Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he salts.
Which of the following statement is not the problem of travel medicine?
查看材料A．Traditional disciplines are not enough for travel medicine.
B．Travel medicine has been colonized by commercial interests.
C．The statistics about travellers are hard to obtain.
D．People spend much money on poor travel advice.答案：D解析：文章第二段提到“…this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines．”因此A项符合文意；根据第三段首句可知，B项符合文意；而C项表述与第四段段意一致，也属于旅行医疗面临的问题；D项“人们将钱花在可怜的旅行建议上”，与旅行医疗没有直接联系，并非旅行医疗面临的问题。 -
第6题：
请阅读短文。
Do who choose to go on exotic, far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel? And even if they pay, who ensures that they get good, up-to-date information? Who, for that matter, should collect that information in the first place? For a variety of reasons, travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants. As a result, many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.
Why is travel medicine so unloved? Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travellers, this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness, jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home, but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.
Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take."The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health, says Ron Behrens, the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London." Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for? It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role, he says.
To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.
A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued. "Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control. Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily- run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security."Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he salts.
What does the author mean by saying "..., but it is notoriously difficult to gel anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy."?
查看材料A．People don't pay attention to their health.
B．Few people are willing to support travel medicine.
C．Most travellers firmly believe that they will be safe.
D．Health comes last compared with others.答案：B解析：题干涉及的句子意为“众所周知，让任何人为人们健康出钱都是非常困难的”，本文的中心词是“旅行医疗”，这类新兴医疗属于健康范畴，因此可推知，人们不愿为旅行医疗投资，B项符合。 -
第7题：
Mark Ellingham has never hesitated to encourage people to travel by air.A.Right
B.Wrong
C.Not mentioned答案：B解析： -
第8题：
Nowadays people can travel around the world（）
- A、by raft
- B、by cruise ship
- C、by a ship
- D、by aboat
正确答案:B -
第9题：
填空题Aristocratic and wealthy people provided a tea service called “Low” tea in the afternoon.____正确答案： G解析：
由题干“Aristocratic and wealthy people”定位到G段。本段提到“Low” tea是供贵族富人们享用的下午茶。故匹配段落为G段。 -
第10题：
单选题Passage1Do who choose to go on exotic，far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel？And even if they pay，who ensures that they get good，up-to-date information？Who，for that matter，should collect that information in the first place？For a variety of reasons，travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants.As a result，many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.Why is travel medicine so unloved？Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travelers ，this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness，jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home，but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take.The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health,says Ron Behrens,the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London.Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for?It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role,he says.To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued.Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control.Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than £ 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security.Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he says.Which of the following statement is not the problem of travel medicine?ATraditional disciplines are not enough for travel medicine.
BTravel medicine has been colonized by commercial interests.
CThe statistics about travellers are hard to obtain.
DPeople spend much money on poor travel advice.
正确答案： B解析： -
第11题：
单选题AThe reasons why people don’t read newspapers are more complicated than assumed.
BThere are more uneducated people among the wealthy than originally expected.
CThe number of newspaper readers is steadily increasing.
DThere are more nonreaders among young people nowadays.
正确答案： A解析：
细节题。录音提到现在的非阅读者收入高，年龄从26到65岁，不阅读多是因为没时间，故选D。其他没有提及。 -
第12题：
问答题Practice 4 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: In the past, people used to travel to see the differences from their home country. However, the sceneries in places around the world seem similar nowadays. What are the causes of these similarities? Do you think that the advantages of this similarity outweigh the disadvantages? You should write at least 250 words.正确答案： 【参考范文】
People who travel to different places aim to expand their horizons by witnessing distinct views in every unique culture and nation. However, there is a strange trend that many places of interest are looking similar.
Why do the scenic spots tend to be built into the same look? An arch-criminal is probably globalization, which makes the distance between nations shrink. Those developing countries are likely to imitate those who greatly succeed in developing tourism, which lead to flooding similarities. Secondly, it is a common phenomenon that people have a sense of security when they travel to a strange place, especially when they are in trouble or danger. Finding somewhere like their hometown comforts their moods and getting some spiritual consolation.
The question, however, is whether this situation is positive or negative for both tourists and residents. To begin with the positive one, through the comparison between different countries, the passion for establishing their national consciousnesses can be ignited. The more one sees in another world, the more he will think about his own living situations natively. From the other side, the same image all around the world leads to the extinction of diversified cultures, which reflect the fulfilled with vivid colorful art and long-lasting historical stories. If the whole world looks uniformly the same, tourism disappears as well as all the regional conventions and treasures.
To conclude based on my personal experience of traveling domestically and abroad, I suggest that people had better see more and feel more in their very a limited lifetime. Even better, one should absorb more with the very soul that the native is the best of all.解析： 暂无解析 -
第13题：
Some students take a year off their studies to____________.A、travel around the world
B、become travel agents
C、visit family members
D、help other people
参考答案：D
-
第14题：
This sampling was all _____ was left him from the time when he could afford to come.
A. which
B. what
C. that
D. who
参考答案： C
-
第15题：
Americans aren't the only people in the world who travel.
参考答案：美国人不是世上唯一爱旅行的人。
-
第16题：
Despite their limitations, however, these systems may eliminate ― or significantly reduce ― the costs that companies face when using privately owned electronic networks, making it easier for smaller companies to afford EDI.
正确答案：虽然这些系统存在一些局限性，但是，它们能够减少或者大大降低公司使用专用电子网络时所面临的成本，这使小公司也用得起EDI。
-
第17题：
请阅读短文。
Do who choose to go on exotic, far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel? And even if they pay, who ensures that they get good, up-to-date information? Who, for that matter, should collect that information in the first place? For a variety of reasons, travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants. As a result, many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.
Why is travel medicine so unloved? Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travellers, this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness, jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home, but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.
Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take."The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health, says Ron Behrens, the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London." Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for? It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role, he says.
To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.
A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued. "Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control. Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily- run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security."Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he salts.
What can we infer frown the first paragraph?
查看材料A．Travel medicine is hard to prevail.
B．People know little about travel medicine.
C．People don't believe in travel medicine.
D．Travellers can seldom get up-to-date information.答案：A解析：文章第一段讲到，因为种种原因，在英国，旅游医疗是没有人愿意承担的责任。于是，许多旅游者在出门前都得仔细贮备一些药品以防旅途中出现疾病困扰。由此可推知，旅行医疗很难盛行起来。 -
第18题：
The majority of people around here are decent.A:real
B:honest
C:normal
D:wealthy答案：B解析：本句意思：这儿的大部分人都很正派。decent正派的，合乎礼节的。real真正的，真实的；honest诚实的，老实的，正直的；normal正常的；wealthy富裕的。 -
第19题：
The majority of people around here are decent.A:real
B:honest
C:normal
D:wealthy答案：B解析：本句意思：这里的大部分人都很正派。decent意思是“正派的，合乎礼节的”，与honest （诚实的，老实的，正直的）意思相近。real真正的，真实的；normal正常的；wealthy富裕的。 -
第20题：
单选题Nowadays people can travel around the world（）Aby raft
Bby cruise ship
Cby a ship
Dby aboat
正确答案： D解析： 暂无解析 -
第21题：
单选题Passage1Do who choose to go on exotic，far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel？And even if they pay，who ensures that they get good，up-to-date information？Who，for that matter，should collect that information in the first place？For a variety of reasons，travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants.As a result，many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.Why is travel medicine so unloved？Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travelers ，this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness，jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home，but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take.The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health,says Ron Behrens,the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London.Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for?It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role,he says.To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued.Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control.Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than £ 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security.Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he says.What can we infer from the first paragraph?ATravel medicine is hard to prevail.
BPeople know little about travel medicine.
CPeople don't believe in travel medicine.
DTravellers can seldom get up-to-date information.
正确答案： A解析： -
第22题：
单选题Passage1Do who choose to go on exotic，far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel？And even if they pay，who ensures that they get good，up-to-date information？Who，for that matter，should collect that information in the first place？For a variety of reasons，travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants.As a result，many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.Why is travel medicine so unloved？Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travelers ，this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness，jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home，but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take.The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health,says Ron Behrens,the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London.Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for?It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role,he says.To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued.Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control.Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than £ 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security.Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he says.What does the author mean by saying… but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.(Para.2)?APeople don't pay attention to their health.
BFew people are willing to support travel medicine.
CMost travellers firmly believe that they will be safe.
DHealth comes last compared with others.
正确答案： D解析： -
第23题：
单选题Which of the following may NOT be the reason for the increasing number of households as mentioned in the passage?AMany people get divorced because of unhappy marriage.
BNow people can afford to support a household individually.
CSome people have to sacrifice family life for their careers.
DMany people live much longer than before.
正确答案： A解析：
第三段第一句作者提到由于种种原因如婚姻关系破裂、职业的选择、寿命的延长、家庭小型化等，单人家庭的数量在增加。这里面没有提到人们可以独自养家。