Converting A, B and AB blood types into type O blood.
A safe way of transfusing blood.
An important use of type O blood.
第1题:
What do you think of your new computer?
A、 I think so.
B、 how about you?
C、 It is really fantastic.
第2题:
A.dog
B.peacock
C.hen
D.cat
第3题:
What does the writer dislike most about dinner parties in New Yorkers
A. There is a strange mix of people.
B. The restaurants are expensive.
C. The bill is not fairly shared.
D. People have to pay cash
第4题:
第5题:
第6题:
There's a new cafeteria at the corner. How about going there for supper? ()
第7题:
Your network consists of an Active Directory domain and a DirectAccess infrastructure. You install Windows7 on a new portable computer and join the computer to the domain. You need to ensure that the computercan establish DirectAccess connections. What should you do?()
第8题:
People who are well paid don’t need to change jobs.
People have the same motivation for changing jobs.
Finding a new job is seldom on people’s New Year resolution.
Workers are in greater demand in January than in December.
第9题:
To tell people not to do dangerous sports.
To explain what volcano surfing and land diving are.
To talk about the world’s best volcano surfer and land diver.
To compare activities in Vanuatu with sports in New Zealand.
第10题:
第11题:
Tennis
Table-tennis
Volleyball
第12题:
to write a new constitution
to see what they can do about the Articles of Confederation
to design a new form of government
to revise the Articles of Confederation
第13题:
A. discovering
B. to discover
C. discover
D. discovery
第14题:
根据下列材料,请回答 31~35 题:
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform. a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works it through the community, the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as “seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.” But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility “happens” to a discovery claim – a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. “We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”
第 31 题 According to the first paragraph, the process of discovery is characterized by its
[A] uncertainty and complexity.
[B] misconception and deceptiveness.
[C] logicality and objectivity.
[D] systematicness and regularity.
第15题:
第16题:
第17题:
When the delegates met at Philadelphia in 1787,their task was()
Ato write a new constitution
Bto see what they can do about the Articles of Confederation
Cto design a new form of government
Dto revise the Articles of Confederation
第18题:
When the delegates met at Philadelphia in 1787,their task was()
第19题:
Converting A, B and AB blood types into type O blood.
A safe way of transfusing blood.
An important use of type O blood.
第20题:
The life forms on other planets are stupid.
Interesting ideas make a new series popular.
The new series might not be successful without better actors.
第21题:
Fine. But it‘s my treat this time.
It‘s newly decorated.
Let‘s look at the menu first.
I have no idea about what to order.
第22题:
The new treatment for diabetes has been applied to humans.
There is not much difference between mouse diabetes and human type diabetes.
The discovery of what goes wrong with a special kind of mice enables scientists to find a way to prevent diabetes in humans.
The discovery made by the research groups led by Daniel L. Kaufman and Hugh Mcdevit is convincing.
第23题:
第24题:
To stop people from drinking milk.
To refute the theory that milk is good for health.
To introduce us a new discovery on genetic mutation.
To infer the declination of the cattle industry.