单选题Some paleontologists claim that the discovery of what appear to be feathers in the fossil of an Archosaur could force a revision of current theories on the phylogeny of Archosaurs, alter conceptions of dinosaur skin surfaces, and require scholars to cr

题目
单选题
Some paleontologists claim that the discovery of what appear to be feathers in the fossil of an Archosaur could force a revision of current theories on the phylogeny of Archosaurs, alter conceptions of dinosaur skin surfaces, and require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier orion than previously thought.
A

require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier origin than previously thought

B

scholars may be required to credit birds with a far earlier origin than previously thought

C

require a crediting by scholars of birds with a far earlier origin than previously thought

D

compared to what was previously thought,  require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier origin

E

crediting birds with a far earlier origin than scholars had previously though


相似考题
更多“单选题Some paleontologists claim that the discovery of what appear to be feathers in the fossil of an Archosaur could force a revision of current theories on the phylogeny of Archosaurs, alter conceptions of dinosaur skin surfaces, and require scholars to cr”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    如何强制执行日志切换()

    A.ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT;

    B.ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT FORCE;

    C.ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE;

    D.ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE FORCE;

    E.ALTER DATABASE LOG SWITCH;


    参考答案:C

  • 第2题:

    Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public(including other scientists)receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”33.Paragraph 3 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible after it

    A.has attracted the attention of the general public.
    B.has been examined by the scientific community.
    C.has received recognition from editors and reviewers.
    D.has been frequently quoted by peer scientists.

    答案:B
    解析:
    该题定位于第三段。第二句话“the community takes control of what happens next”是一句总领句,接着本段第三句话中提到“Within the complex social structure of the scientific community”,三个分号具体说明了the community中的researchers,editors and reviewers,other scientists和the public是如何“take control of th

  • 第3题:

    Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public(including other scientists)receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”32.It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that credibility process requires

    A.strict inspection.
    B.shared efforts.
    C.individual wisdom.
    D.persistent innovation.

    答案:B
    解析:
    该题定位于第二段。第二段第二句中提到“But it takes collective scrutiny and accept-ance to...”,其中it指的是将科学发现获得公众可信度的过程。第四句话具体讲到了这个过程:“through which the individual researcher’s me,here,nowbecomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.”,即要经历从个人到集体的过程,需要大家共同的努力,故答案为B项。A

  • 第4题:

    In a customer’s network, VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) is running with a domain named main1. VLANs 1,2,3,4,5,10,20 are active on the network. Suddenly the whole network goes down. No traffic is being passed on VLANs 2,3,4,5,10,20, however traffic passes on VLAN 1 and indicates all switches are operational. Right before the network problem occurred, a switch named TEST1 was added to the network.  What three configuration issues on TEST1 could be causing the network outage?()

    • A、TEST1 is configured as a VTP server with a different domain name.
    • B、TEST1 is not configured to participate in VTP.
    • C、TEST1 is configured as a VTP server with the domain name main1.
    • D、TEST1 has a lower VTP configuration revision than the current VTP revision.
    • E、TEST1 has a higher VTP configuration revision than the current VTP revision.
    • F、TEST1 is configured with only VLAN1.

    正确答案:C,E,F

  • 第5题:

    如何强制执行日志切换()

    • A、ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT;
    • B、ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT FORCE;
    • C、ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE;
    • D、ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE FORCE;
    • E、ALTER DATABASE LOG SWITCH;

    正确答案:C

  • 第6题:

    Examine the following command:   ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE;   In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group?()  

    • A、 when ASM disk goes offline
    • B、 when one or more ASM files are dropped
    • C、 when some disks in a disk group are offline
    • D、 when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing

    正确答案:C

  • 第7题:

    单选题
    Examine the following command:   ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE;   In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group?()
    A

     when ASM disk goes offline

    B

     when one or more ASM files are dropped

    C

     when some disks in a disk group are offline

    D

     when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing


    正确答案: B
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第8题:

    单选题
    Paleontologists hypothesize that modern birds evolved from the family of dinosaurs that included Tyrannosaurus rex. This hypothesis would be strongly supported if evidence that dinosaurs from this family had a body covering resembling feathers could be found, but so far no such evidence has been found.  Which of the following, if true, would most help the paleontologists explain why no evidence of feathered dinosaurs has yet been found?
    A

    Fossilized dinosaurs have shown many birdlike characteristics, such as bone structure and winglike arms.

    B

    If birds are in fact the descendants of dinosaurs, then it can be argued that the dinosaurs never really died out.

    C

    Flying dinosaurs such as the Pteranodon, which is not thought to have been related to modern birds, do not appear to have had feathers.

    D

    Soft tissues such as skin and feathers do not fossilize like bones, and therefore are far less likely to have left permanent evidence in the fossil record.

    E

    The thousands of dinosaur fossils excavated by paleontologists represent only a tiny fraction of the billions of dinosaurs that once lived.


    正确答案: D
    解析:
    D项为未发掘到恐龙皮肤的原因提供了一个可能的答案,故D项是正确的。E项与问题的关联度不如D项,所以不选E项。

  • 第9题:

    单选题
    If you use ALTER DISKGROUP ... ADD DISK and specify a wildcard for the discovery string, what happens to disks that are already a part of the same or another disk group?()
    A

     The command fails unless you specify the FORCE option.

    B

     The command fails unless you specify the REUSE option.

    C

     The command must be reissued with a more specific discovery string.

    D

     The other disks, already part of the disk group,are ignored.


    正确答案: C
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第10题:

    单选题
    What must be the same to make multiple switches part of the same Multiple Spanning Tree (MST)?()
    A

    VLAN instance mapping and revision number

    B

    VLAN instance mapping and member list

    C

    VLAN instance mapping, revision number, and member list

    D

    VLAN instance mapping, revision number, member list, and timers


    正确答案: B
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第11题:

    单选题
    Companycom is migrating from p670 systems running AIX 5.2 to p5 595 systems running AIX 5.3. They will be changing out only the system units. They will re-use the existing 61D drawers and adapters with the new p5 595 systems. What compatibility issue must be considered?()
    A

    APV features are not supported for some legacy POWER4 adapters

    B

    APV will require the most current maintenance level for AIX 5.2

    C

    APV features will require that legacy POWER4 adapters be updated with new microcode

    D

    The Virtual IO Server must run AIX 5.3 and the LPARs can run either AIX 5.2 or AIX 5.3


    正确答案: C
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第12题:

    多选题
    A VTP domain has six active VLANs. Without notice, all VLANs except VLAN1 fail. Just prior tothe failure, Switch2 was added to the network. Which three issues on Switch2 could be the cause?()
    A

    Switch2 is configured for only VLAN1

    B

    Switch2 is a VTP server in a different domain

    C

    Switch2 is a VTP server in the Company domain

    D

    Switch2 is not a VTP domain.

    E

    Switch2 has a lower VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revision

    F

    Switch2 has a higher VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revision


    正确答案: D,B
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第13题:

    What can we infer about primitive birds from the text?

    A.They had claws to help them climb.

    B.They could fly long distances.

    C.They had four wings like hoatzins.

    D.They had a head with long feathers on the top.


    正确答案:A

  • 第14题:

    Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public(including other scientists)receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”35.Which of the following would be the best title of the test?

    A.Novelty as an Engine of Scientific Development.
    B.Collective Scrutiny in Scientific Discovery.
    C.Evolution of Credibility in Doing Science.
    D.Challenge to Credibility at the Gate to Science.

    答案:C
    解析:
    此题考察对全文主旨大意的准确归纳。从整个文章脉络来看,文章第一段主要讲了科学研究的现实过程与理想过程的差异。第二段提出了“可信性过程”这个概念,并对其展开说明。第三段主要讲个人的发现声明转变为集体可信的发现的过程。第四段首句概括了段落中心,讲可信性过程中存在的两个矛盾。最后一段引用Annette Baier的话总结发现声明中的可信性过程。由此可知,C项统领全文,为正确答案。A项与原文不符;B项只是第二段内容的一部分,属于细节内容,不能概括全文;而D项只是对第四段的概括。

  • 第15题:

    Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public(including other scientists)receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”34.Albert Szent-Gy?rgyi would most likely agree that

    A.scientific claims will survive challenges.
    B.discoveries today inspire future research.
    C.efforts to make discoveries are justified.
    D.scientific work calls for a critical mind.

    答案:D
    解析:
    该题根据题干中的Albert Szent-Gy?rgyi定位于第四段。第四段主要讲到了科学发现获得可信度的过程中面临的两个矛盾。Albert Szent-Gy?rgyi的观点主要针对第二个矛盾,即创新本身经常会引起怀疑。同时他认为科学发现需要“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought”,即“看所有人已经看到的,想无人想过的”。这句话暗示了科学发现的过程需要有评判性思维,即我们应该去探求事物。故答案为D项。A项与

  • 第16题:

    A VTP domain has six active VLANs. Without notice, all VLANs except VLAN1 fail. Just prior tothe failure, Switch2 was added to the network. Which three issues on Switch2 could be the cause?()

    • A、Switch2 is configured for only VLAN1
    • B、Switch2 is a VTP server in a different domain
    • C、Switch2 is a VTP server in the Company domain
    • D、Switch2 is not a VTP domain.
    • E、Switch2 has a lower VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revision
    • F、Switch2 has a higher VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revision

    正确答案:A,C,F

  • 第17题:

    If you use ALTER DISKGROUP ... ADD DISK and specify a wildcard for the discovery string, what happens to disks that are already a part of the same or another disk group?()  

    • A、 The command fails unless you specify the FORCE option.
    • B、 The command fails unless you specify the REUSE option.
    • C、 The command must be reissued with a more specific discovery string.
    • D、 The other disks, already part of the disk group,are ignored.

    正确答案:D

  • 第18题:

    单选题
    The skulls and pelvic bones of some species of dinosaur share characteristics with the skulls and pelvic bones of all modern birds. Even though not all dinosaurs have these characteristics, there are scientists who claim that all animals that do have these characteristics are dinosaurs.  If the statements above and the claim of the scientists are true, which of the following must also be true?
    A

    Birds share more characteristics with dinosaurs than they do with other animals.

    B

    Some ancient dinosaurs were indistinguishable from modern birds.

    C

    All animals whose skulls share the characteristics of those of modern birds also have pelvic bones that are similar to those of modern birds.

    D

    Modern birds are dinosaurs.

    E

    All dinosaurs are birds.


    正确答案: E
    解析:
    由文段可知,科学家根据一些恐龙的头盖骨和骨盆骨与所有现代鸟类的头盖骨和骨盆骨有许多相同特征,得出结论:所有具有这些特征的动物是恐龙,如果这个推理是正确的话,我们可以认为现代鸟类是恐龙,故本题选D项。

  • 第19题:

    单选题
    Examine the following command: ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE; In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group? ()
    A

    when ASM disk goes offline

    B

    when one or more ASM files are dropped

    C

    when some disks in a disk group are offline

    D

    when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing


    正确答案: C
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第20题:

    单选题
    Your company has client computers that run Windows 7 and client computers that run Windows XP Professional. You enable the Network Discovery feature on the Windows 7 computers. You discover that the Windows XP computers do not appear on the network map. You need to ensure that all client computers appear on the network map. What should you do?()
    A

    Configure the IPv6 protocol on the Windows 7 computers.

    B

    Configure the network shares on the Windows 7 computers to include the user names of all employees.

    C

    Configure the network shares on the Windows XP computers to include the user names of all employees.

    D

    Install the Link Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) Responder on the Windows XP computers.


    正确答案: C
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第21题:

    单选题
    What is an ebb current().
    A

    A current at minimum flow

    B

    A current coming in

    C

    A current going out

    D

    A current at maximum flow


    正确答案: D
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第22题:

    单选题
    Why was Salman Rushdie ambivalent about the idea of scholars studying his papers?
    A

    He was afraid that he would be pursued by Islamic extremists again.

    B

    The scholars might use the papers to write a biography about him

    C

    He felt that his privacy might be easily exposed to the public.

    D

    He could not imagine what kind of consequences would be following.


    正确答案: A
    解析:
    文章倒数第二段指出在把自己的文稿、日记等档案出售给美国的Amory university后,Rushdie对于这些文档和日记是否可以公开以及怎样公开存有矛盾心理。他在该段最后一句指出整件事都非常bizarre,就好像想象有人going through your underwear,可见他在对个人隐私问题表示担忧和不安。

  • 第23题:

    单选题
    The discovery of these tombs is _____ for scholars' studying Chinese history.
    A

    of very important

    B

    great significant

    C

    of great significance

    D

    greatly importance


    正确答案: C
    解析: