(ii) Explain the income tax (IT), national insurance (NIC) and capital gains tax (CGT) implications arising onthe grant to and exercise by an employee of an option to buy shares in an unapproved share optionscheme and on the subsequent sale of these share

题目

(ii) Explain the income tax (IT), national insurance (NIC) and capital gains tax (CGT) implications arising on

the grant to and exercise by an employee of an option to buy shares in an unapproved share option

scheme and on the subsequent sale of these shares. State clearly how these would apply in Henry’s

case. (8 marks)


相似考题
更多“(ii) Explain the income tax (IT), national insurance (NIC) and capital gains tax (CGT) implications arising onthe grant to and exercise by an employee of an option to buy shares in an unapproved share optionscheme and on the subsequent sale of these share”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    (ii) State, giving reasons, the tax reliefs in relation to inheritance tax (IHT) and capital gains tax (CGT) which

    would be available to Alasdair if he acquires the warehouse and leases it to Gallus & Co, rather than to

    an unconnected tenant. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Apart from the fact that Alasdair can keep an eye on his tenant, the main advantages are twofold:
    IHT: If the firm are the tenants, the property will be land and buildings used in a business carried on by a partnership
    in which the donor is a partner. Thus, Alasdair will be able to claim business property relief (BPR) at a rate of 50%
    so long as he remains a partner in the firm. However, this relief would not be available until Alasdair has owned
    the property for at least two years from his firm taking up the tenancy.
    CGT: As Alasdair is a partner in the firm using the building, it will also be a qualifying asset for the purposes of rollover
    relief on any gains arising from the disposal of the property. Assuming that Alasdair acquires a replacement asset
    which will be used in the trade, the gain on sale can be deferred against the tax base cost of the replacement asset.
    In the event that rollover relief cannot be used, any gains on disposal will be subject to business asset taper relief.

  • 第2题:

    (b) Identify the most appropriate approved share option scheme for Happy Home Ltd. Outline the scheme

    requirements and the tax benefits of using it compared to the current unapproved scheme. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Share option scheme
    The scheme that is best suited to Happy Home Limited is the enterprise management incentive (EMI) scheme. This share
    option scheme is aimed at small fast growing companies, and because the potential risks are considered to be higher, the
    available rewards are greater.
    To qualify, the company must be a trading company, carrying out a qualifying trade in the United Kingdom, with gross assets
    no more than £30m. The company must not be under the control of another company.
    A qualifying company can grant each employee unexercised options over shares worth up to £100,000 per employee subject
    to a total overall limit of unexercised options of £3 million. The options must be granted for commercial reasons to recruit and
    retain the employee(s).
    A qualifying employee is one who works on average 25 hours per week or 75% of their working time and who does not
    (together with his/her associates) have a material interest in the company.
    No income tax or national insurance is charged on either the grant or the exercise of the option provided that the option is
    exercised not more than 10 years from the date of the grant and the amount paid is not less than the market value of the
    shares at the time the option was granted.
    On the sale of the shares, capital gains tax will apply, but business asset taper relief is available. Also in this case, the taper
    relief starts from the date the option is granted and not from the date of exercise, as is the case with other option schemes.

  • 第3题:

    3 On 1 January 2007 Dovedale Ltd, a company with no subsidiaries, intends to purchase 65% of the ordinary share

    capital of Hira Ltd from Belgrove Ltd. Belgrove Ltd currently owns 100% of the share capital of Hira Ltd and has no

    other subsidiaries. All three companies have their head offices in the UK and are UK resident.

    Hira Ltd had trading losses brought forward, as at 1 April 2006, of £18,600 and no income or gains against which

    to offset losses in the year ended 31 March 2006. In the year ending 31 March 2007 the company expects to make

    further tax adjusted trading losses of £55,000 before deduction of capital allowances, and to have no other income

    or gains. The tax written down value of Hira Ltd’s plant and machinery as at 31 March 2006 was £96,000 and

    there will be no fixed asset additions or disposals in the year ending 31 March 2007. In the year ending 31 March

    2008 a small tax adjusted trading loss is anticipated. Hira Ltd will surrender the maximum possible trading losses

    to Belgrove Ltd and Dovedale Ltd.

    The tax adjusted trading profit of Dovedale Ltd for the year ending 31 March 2007 is expected to be £875,000 and

    to continue at this level in the future. The profits chargeable to corporation tax of Belgrove Ltd are expected to be

    £38,000 for the year ending 31 March 2007 and to increase in the future.

    On 1 February 2007 Dovedale Ltd will sell a small office building to Hira Ltd for its market value of £234,000.

    Dovedale Ltd purchased the building in March 2005 for £210,000. In October 2004 Dovedale Ltd sold a factory

    for £277,450 making a capital gain of £84,217. A claim was made to roll over the gain on the sale of the factory

    against the acquisition cost of the office building.

    On 1 April 2007 Dovedale Ltd intends to acquire the whole of the ordinary share capital of Atapo Inc, an unquoted

    company resident in the country of Morovia. Atapo Inc sells components to Dovedale Ltd as well as to other

    companies in Morovia and around the world.

    It is estimated that Atapo Inc will make a profit before tax of £160,000 in the year ending 31 March 2008 and will

    pay a dividend to Dovedale Ltd of £105,000. It can be assumed that Atapo Inc’s taxable profits are equal to its profit

    before tax. The rate of corporation tax in Morovia is 9%. There is a withholding tax of 3% on dividends paid to

    non-Morovian resident shareholders. There is no double tax agreement between the UK and Morovia.

    Required:

    (a) Advise Belgrove Ltd of any capital gains that may arise as a result of the sale of the shares in Hira Ltd. You

    are not required to calculate any capital gains in this part of the question. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (a) Capital gains that may arise on the sale by Belgrove Ltd of shares in Hira Ltd
    Belgrove Ltd will realise a capital gain on the sale of the shares unless the substantial shareholding exemption applies. The
    exemption will be given automatically provided all of the following conditions are satisfied.
    – Belgrove Ltd has owned at least 10% of Hira Ltd for a minimum of 12 months during the two years prior to the sale.
    – Belgrove Ltd is a trading company or a member of a trading group during that 12-month period and immediately after
    the sale.
    – Hira Ltd is a trading company or the holding company of a trading group during that 12-month period and immediately
    after the sale.
    Hira Ltd will no longer be in a capital gains group with Belgrove Ltd after the sale. Accordingly, a capital gain, known as a
    degrouping charge, may arise in Hira Ltd. A degrouping charge will arise if, at the time it leaves the Belgrove Ltd group, Hira
    Ltd owns any capital assets which were transferred to it at no gain, no loss within the previous six years by a member of the
    Belgrove Ltd capital gains group.

  • 第4题:

    (d) Explain how Gloria would be taxed in the UK on the dividends paid by Bubble Inc and the capital gains tax

    and inheritance tax implications of a future disposal of the shares. Clearly state, giving reasons, whether or

    not the payment made to Eric is allowable for capital gains tax purposes. (9 marks)

    You should assume that the rates and allowances for the tax year 2005/06 apply throughout this question.


    正确答案:
    (d) UK tax implications of shares in Bubble Inc
    Income tax
    Gloria is UK resident and is therefore subject to income tax on her worldwide income. However, because she is non-UK
    domiciled, she will only be taxed on the foreign dividends she brings into the UK.
    Dividends brought into the UK will be grossed up for any tax paid in Oceania. The gross amount is taxed at 10% if it falls
    into the starting or basic rate band and at 321/2% if it falls into the higher rate band. The tax suffered in Oceania is available
    for offset against the UK tax liability. The offset is restricted to a maximum of the UK tax on the dividend income.
    Capital gains tax
    Individuals are subject to capital gains tax on worldwide assets if they are resident or ordinarily resident in the UK. However,
    because Gloria is non-UK domiciled and the shares are situated abroad, the gain is only taxable to the extent that the sales
    proceeds are brought into the UK. Any tax suffered in Oceania in respect of the gain is available for offset against the UK
    capital gains tax liability arising on the shares.
    Any loss arising on the disposal of the shares would not be available for relief in the UK.
    In computing a capital gain or allowable loss, a deduction is available for the incidental costs of acquisition. However, to be
    allowable, such costs must be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of acquiring the asset. The fee paid to Eric
    related to general investment advice and not to the acquisition of the shares and therefore, would not be deductible in
    computing the gain.
    Taper relief will be at non-business asset rates as Bubble Inc is an investment company.
    Inheritance tax
    Assets situated abroad owned by non-UK domiciled individuals are excluded property for the purposes of inheritance tax.
    However, Gloria will be deemed to be UK domiciled (for the purposes of inheritance tax only) if she has been resident in the
    UK for 17 out of the 20 tax years ending with the year in which the disposal occurs.
    Gloria has been running a business in the UK since June 1992 and would therefore, appear to have been resident for at least
    15 tax years (1992/93 to 2006/07 inclusive).
    If Gloria is deemed to be UK domiciled such that the shares in Bubble Inc are not excluded property, business property relief
    will not be available because Bubble Inc is an investment company.

  • 第5题:

    (b) (i) State the condition that would need to be satisfied for the exercise of Paul’s share options in Memphis

    plc to be exempt from income tax and the tax implications if this condition is not satisfied.

    (2 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) Paul has options in an HMRC approved share scheme. Under such schemes, no tax liabilities arise either on the grant
    or exercise of the option. The excess of the proceeds over the price paid for the shares (the exercise price) is charged to
    capital gains tax on their disposal.
    However, in order to secure this treatment, one of the conditions to be satisfied is that the options cannot be exercised
    within three years of the date of grant. If Paul were to exercise his options now (i.e. before the third anniversary of the
    grant), the exercise would instead be treated as an unapproved exercise. At that date, income tax would be charged on
    the difference between the market value of the shares on exercise and the price paid to exercise the option.

  • 第6题:

    (b) For this part, assume today’s date is 1 May 2010.

    Bill and Ben decided not to sell their company, and instead expanded the business themselves. Ben, however,

    is now pursuing other interests, and is no longer involved with the day to day activities of Flower Limited. Bill

    believes that the company would be better off without Ben as a voting shareholder, and wishes to buy Ben’s

    shares. However, Bill does not have sufficient funds to buy the shares himself, and so is wondering if the

    company could acquire the shares instead.

    The proposed price for Ben’s shares would be £500,000. Both Bill and Ben pay income tax at the higher rate.

    Required:

    Write a letter to Ben:

    (1) stating the income tax (IT) and/or capital gains tax (CGT) implications for Ben if Flower Limited were to

    repurchase his 50% holding of ordinary shares, immediately in May 2010; and

    (2) advising him of any available planning options that might improve this tax position. Clearly explain any

    conditions which must be satisfied and quantify the tax savings which may result.

    (13 marks)

    Assume that the corporation tax rates for the financial year 2005 and the income tax rates and allowances

    for the tax year 2005/06 apply throughout this question.


    正确答案:

    (b) [Ben’s address]                                                                                                     [Firm’s address]
    Dear Ben                                                                                                                              [Date]
    A company purchase of own shares can be subject to capital gains treatment if certain conditions are satisfied. However, one
    of these conditions is that the shares in question must have been held for a minimum period of five years. As at 1 May 2010,
    your shares in Flower Limited have only been held for four years and ten months. As a result, the capital gains treatment will
    not apply.
    In the absence of capital gains treatment, the position on a company repurchase of its own shares is that the payment will
    be treated as an income distribution (i.e. a dividend) in the hands of the recipient. The distribution element is calculated as
    the proceeds received for the shares less the price paid for them. On the basis that the purchase price is £500,000, then the
    element of distribution will be £499,500 (500,000 – 500). This would be taxed as follows:

  • 第7题:

    (b) (i) Advise Andrew of the income tax (IT) and capital gains tax (CGT) reliefs available on his investment in

    the ordinary share capital of Scalar Limited, together with any conditions which need to be satisfied.

    Your answer should clearly identify any steps that should be taken by Andrew and the other investors

    to obtain the maximum relief. (13 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) Andrew may be able to take advantage of tax reliefs under the enterprise investment scheme (EIS) provided the
    necessary conditions are met. The conditions that have to be satisfied before full relief is available fall into three areas,
    and broadly require that a ‘qualifying individual’ subscribes for ‘eligible shares’ in a ‘qualifying company’.
    ‘Qualifying Individual’
    To be a qualifying individual, Andrew must not be connected with the EIS company. This means that he should not be
    an employee (or, at the time the shares are issued, a director) or have an interest in (i.e. control) 30% or more of the
    capital of the company. These conditions need to be satisfied throughout the period beginning two years before the share
    issue and three years after the ‘relevant date’. Where the relevant date is defined as the later of the date the shares were
    issued and the date on which the company commenced trading.
    Andrew does not intend to become an employee (or director) of Scalar Limited, but he needs to exercise caution as to
    how many shares he subscribes for. If only three investors subscribe for 100% of the shares, each will hold 33% of the
    share capital. This exceeds the 30% limit and will mean that EIS relief (other than deferral relief) will not be available.
    Therefore, Andrew and the other two investors should ensure not only that the potential fourth investor is recruited, but
    that s/he subscribes for sufficient shares, such that none of them will hold 30% or more of the issued share capital, as
    only then will they all attain qualifying individual status.
    ‘Eligible shares’
    Qualifying shares need to be new ordinary shares which are subscribed for in cash and fully paid up at the time of issue.
    The shares must not be redeemable for at least three years from the relevant date, and not carry any preferential rights
    to dividends. On the basis of the information provided, the shares of Scalar Limited would qualify as eligible shares.
    ‘Qualifying Company’
    The company must be unquoted, not controlled by another company, and engaged in qualifying business activities. The
    latter requires that the company engage in a trading activity, which is carried on wholly or mainly in the UK, throughout
    the three years following the relevant date. While certain trading activities, such as dealing in shares or trading in land,
    are excluded, the manufacturing trade Scalar Limited proposes to carry on will qualify.
    However, it is also necessary for at least 80% of the money raised to be used for the qualifying business activity within
    12 months of the relevant date and the remaining 20% to be so used within the following 12 months. Andrew and the
    other investors will thus have to ensure that Scalar Limited has not raised more funds than it is able to employ in the
    business within the appropriate time periods.
    Reliefs available:
    Andrew can claim income tax relief at 20% income tax relief on the amount invested up to a maximum of £200,000
    in any one tax year. The relief is given in the form. of a tax reducing allowance, which can reduce the investor’s income
    tax liability to nil, but cannot be used to generate a tax refund. If the investment is made prior to 6 October in the tax
    year, then 50% of the amount invested (up to a maximum of £25,000) can be treated as having been made in the
    previous tax year.
    Any capital gains arising on the sale of EIS shares will be fully exempt from capital gains tax provided that income tax
    relief was given on the investment when made and has not been withdrawn. If the EIS shares are disposed of at a loss,
    capital losses are still allowable, but reduced by the amount of any EIS relief attributable to the shares disposed of.
    In addition, gains from the disposal of other assets can be deferred against the base cost of EIS shares acquired within
    one year before and three years after their disposal. Such gains will, thus, not normally become chargeable until the EIS
    shares themselves are disposed of. Further, for deferral relief to be available, it is not necessary for the investment to
    qualify for EIS income tax relief, i.e. deferral is available even where the investor is not a qualifying individual. Thus,
    Andrew could still defer the gain arising on the disposal of the residential property lease made in order to raise part of
    the funds for his EIS investment, even if no fourth investor were to be found and his shareholding were to exceed 30%
    of the issued share capital of Scalar Limited. Does not require the existence of income tax relief in order to be claimed.
    Withdrawal of relief:
    Any EIS relief claimed by Andrew will be withdrawn (partially or fully) if, within three year of the relevant date:
    (1) he disposes of the shares;
    (2) he receives value from the company;
    (3) he ceases to be a qualifying individual; or
    (4) Scalar Limited ceases to be a qualifying company.
    With regard to receiving value from the company, the definition excludes dividends which do not exceed a normal rate
    of return, but does include the repayment of any loans made to the company before the shares were issued, the provision
    of benefits and the purchase of assets from the company at an undervalue. In this regard, Andrew and the other
    subscribers should ensure that the £50,000 they are to invest in Scalar Limited as loan capital is appropriately timed
    and structured relative to the issue of the EIS shares.

  • 第8题:

    (ii) Analyse the effect of delaying the sale of the business of the Stiletto Partnership to Razor Ltd until

    30 April 2007 on Clint’s income tax and national insurance position.

    You are not required to prepare detailed calculations of his income tax or national insurance liabilities.

    (4 marks)


    正确答案:

    (ii) The implications of delaying the sale of the business
    The implications of delaying the sale of the business until 30 April would have been as follows:
    – Clint would have received an additional two months of profits amounting to £6,920 (£20,760 x 1/3).
    – Clint’s trading income in 2006/07 would have been reduced by £13,015 (£43,723 – £30,708), much of which
    would have been subject to income tax at 40%. His additional trading income in 2007/08 of £19,935 would all
    have been taxed at 10% and 22%.
    – Clint is entitled to the personal age allowance of £7,280 in both years. However, it is abated by £1 for every £2
    by which his total income exceeds £20,100. Once Clint’s total income exceeds £24,590 (£20,100 + ((£7,280
    – £5,035) x 2)), his personal allowance will be reduced to the standard amount of £5,035. Accordingly, the
    increased personal allowance would not be available in 2006/07 regardless of the year in which the business was
    sold. It is available in 2007/08 (although part of it is wasted) but would not have been if the sale of the business
    had been delayed.
    – Clint’s class 4 national insurance contributions in 2006/07 would have been reduced due to the fall in the level
    of his trading income. However, much of the saving would be at 1% only. Clint is not liable to class 4 national
    insurance contributions in 2007/08 as he is 65 at the start of the year.
    – Changing the date on which the business was sold would have had no effect on Clint’s class 2 liability as he is
    not required to make class 2 contributions once he is 65 years old.

  • 第9题:

    (b) Explain the corporation tax and value added tax (VAT) implications of the following aspects of the proposed

    restructuring of the Rapier Ltd group.

    (i) The immediate tax implications of the restructuring. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) The tax implications of the proposed restructuring of the Rapier Ltd group
    (i) Immediate implications
    Corporation tax
    Rapier Ltd and its subsidiaries are in a capital gains group as Rapier Ltd owns at least 75% of the ordinary share capital
    of each of the subsidiary companies. Any non-exempt items of plant and machinery owned by the subsidiaries will
    therefore be transferred to Rapier Ltd at no gain, no loss.
    No taxable credit or allowable debit will arise on the transfer of the subsidiaries’ goodwill to Rapier Ltd because the
    companies are in a capital gains group.
    The trading losses brought forward in Dirk Ltd will be transferred with the trade to Rapier Ltd as the effective ownership
    of the three trades will not change (Rapier Ltd owns the subsidiaries which own the trades and, following the
    restructuring, will own the three trades directly). The losses will be restricted to being offset against the future trading
    profits of the Dirk trade only.
    There will be no balancing adjustments in respect of the plant and machinery transferred to Rapier Ltd. Writing down
    allowances will be claimed by the subsidiaries in respect of the year ending 30 June 2007 and by Rapier Ltd in respect
    of future periods.
    Value added tax (VAT)
    No VAT should be charged on the sales of the businesses to Rapier Ltd as they are outside the scope of VAT. This is
    because the trades are to be transferred as going concerns to a VAT registered person with no significant break in trading.
    Switch Ltd must notify HM Revenue and Customs by 30 July 2007 that it has ceased to make taxable supplies.

  • 第10题:

    (b) (i) Explain, by reference to Coral’s residence, ordinary residence and domicile position, how the rental

    income arising in respect of the property in the country of Kalania will be taxed in the UK in the tax year

    2007/08. State the strategy that Coral should adopt in order to minimise the total income tax suffered

    on the rental income. (7 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) UK tax on the rental income
    Coral is UK resident in 2007/08 because she is present in the UK for more than 182 days. Accordingly, she will be
    subject to UK income tax on her Kalanian rental income.
    Coral is ordinarily resident in the UK in 2007/08 as she is habitually resident in the UK.
    Coral will have acquired a domicile of origin in Kalania from her father. She has not acquired a domicile of choice in the
    UK as she has not severed her ties with Kalania and does not intend to make her permanent home in the UK.
    Accordingly, the rental income will be taxed in the UK on the remittance basis.
    Any rental income remitted to the UK will fall into the basic rate band and will be subject to income tax at 22% on the
    gross amount (before deduction of Kalanian tax). Unilateral double tax relief will be available in respect of the 8% tax
    suffered in Kalania such that the effective rate of tax suffered by Coral in the UK on the grossed up amount of income
    remitted will be 14%.
    In order to minimise the total income tax suffered on the rental income Coral should ensure that it is not brought into or
    used in the UK such that it will not be subject to income tax in the UK.
    Coral should retain evidence, for example bank statements, to show that the rental income has not been removed from
    Kalania. Coral can use the money whilst she is on holiday in Kalania with no UK tax implications.

  • 第11题:

    3 Spica, one of the director shareholders of Acrux Ltd, has been in dispute with the other shareholders over plans to

    expand the company’s activities overseas. In order to resolve the position it has been agreed that Spica will sell her

    shares back to the company. Once the purchase of her shares has taken place, the company intends to establish a

    number of branches overseas and acquire a shareholding in a number of companies that are resident and trade in

    overseas countries.

    The following information has been obtained from client files and meetings with the parties involved.

    Acrux Ltd:

    – An unquoted UK resident company.

    – Share capital consists of 50,000 ordinary shares issued at £1·90 per share in July 2000.

    – None of the other shareholders has any connection with Spica.

    The purchase of own shares:

    – The company will purchase all of Spica’s shares for £8 per share.

    – The transaction will take place by the end of 2008.

    Spica:

    – Purchased 8,000 shares in Acrux Ltd for £2 per share on 30 September 2003.

    – Has no income in the tax year 2008/09.

    – Has chargeable capital gains in the tax year 2008/09 of £3,800.

    – Has houses in the UK and the country of Solaris and divides her time between them.

    Investment in non-UK resident companies:

    – Acrux Ltd will acquire between 15% and 20% of each of the non-UK resident companies.

    – The companies will not be controlled foreign companies as the rates of tax in the overseas countries will be

    between 23% and 42%.

    – There may or may not be a double tax treaty between the UK and the overseas countries in which the companies

    are resident. Where there is a treaty, it will be based on the OECD model treaty.

    – None of the countries concerned levy withholding tax on dividends paid to UK companies.

    – The directors of Acrux Ltd are concerned that the rate of tax suffered on the profits of the overseas companies

    will be very high as they will be taxed in both the overseas country and in the UK.

    Required:

    (a) (i) Prepare detailed calculations to determine the most beneficial tax treatment of the payment Spica will

    receive for her shares; (7 marks)


    正确答案:

     

  • 第12题:

    (a) The following figures have been calculated from the financial statements (including comparatives) of Barstead for

    the year ended 30 September 2009:

    increase in profit after taxation 80%

    increase in (basic) earnings per share 5%

    increase in diluted earnings per share 2%

    Required:

    Explain why the three measures of earnings (profit) growth for the same company over the same period can

    give apparently differing impressions. (4 marks)

    (b) The profit after tax for Barstead for the year ended 30 September 2009 was $15 million. At 1 October 2008 the company had in issue 36 million equity shares and a $10 million 8% convertible loan note. The loan note will mature in 2010 and will be redeemed at par or converted to equity shares on the basis of 25 shares for each $100 of loan note at the loan-note holders’ option. On 1 January 2009 Barstead made a fully subscribed rights issue of one new share for every four shares held at a price of $2·80 each. The market price of the equity shares of Barstead immediately before the issue was $3·80. The earnings per share (EPS) reported for the year ended 30 September 2008 was 35 cents.

    Barstead’s income tax rate is 25%.

    Required:

    Calculate the (basic) EPS figure for Barstead (including comparatives) and the diluted EPS (comparatives not required) that would be disclosed for the year ended 30 September 2009. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (a)Whilstprofitaftertax(anditsgrowth)isausefulmeasure,itmaynotgiveafairrepresentationofthetrueunderlyingearningsperformance.Inthisexample,userscouldinterpretthelargeannualincreaseinprofitaftertaxof80%asbeingindicativeofanunderlyingimprovementinprofitability(ratherthanwhatitreallyis:anincreaseinabsoluteprofit).Itispossible,evenprobable,that(someof)theprofitgrowthhasbeenachievedthroughtheacquisitionofothercompanies(acquisitivegrowth).Wherecompaniesareacquiredfromtheproceedsofanewissueofshares,orwheretheyhavebeenacquiredthroughshareexchanges,thiswillresultinagreaternumberofequitysharesoftheacquiringcompanybeinginissue.ThisiswhatappearstohavehappenedinthecaseofBarsteadastheimprovementindicatedbyitsearningspershare(EPS)isonly5%perannum.ThisexplainswhytheEPS(andthetrendofEPS)isconsideredamorereliableindicatorofperformancebecausetheadditionalprofitswhichcouldbeexpectedfromthegreaterresources(proceedsfromthesharesissued)ismatchedwiththeincreaseinthenumberofshares.Simplylookingatthegrowthinacompany’sprofitaftertaxdoesnottakeintoaccountanyincreasesintheresourcesusedtoearnthem.Anyincreaseingrowthfinancedbyborrowings(debt)wouldnothavethesameimpactonprofit(asbeingfinancedbyequityshares)becausethefinancecostsofthedebtwouldacttoreduceprofit.ThecalculationofadilutedEPStakesintoaccountanypotentialequitysharesinissue.Potentialordinarysharesarisefromfinancialinstruments(e.g.convertibleloannotesandoptions)thatmayentitletheirholderstoequitysharesinthefuture.ThedilutedEPSisusefulasitalertsexistingshareholderstothefactthatfutureEPSmaybereducedasaresultofsharecapitalchanges;inasenseitisawarningsign.InthiscasethelowerincreaseinthedilutedEPSisevidencethatthe(higher)increaseinthebasicEPShas,inpart,beenachievedthroughtheincreaseduseofdilutingfinancialinstruments.Thefinancecostoftheseinstrumentsislessthantheearningstheirproceedshavegeneratedleadingtoanincreaseincurrentprofits(andbasicEPS);however,inthefuturetheywillcausemoresharestobeissued.ThiscausesadilutionwherethefinancecostperpotentialnewshareislessthanthebasicEPS.

  • 第13题:

    (c) (i) Explain the capital gains tax (CGT) implications of a takeover where the consideration is in the form. of

    shares (a ‘paper for paper’ transaction) stating any conditions that need to be satisfied. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) (i) Paper for paper rules
    The proposed transaction broadly falls under the ‘paper for paper’ rules. Where this is the case, chargeable gains do not
    arise. Instead, the new holding stands in the shoes (and inherits the base cost) of the original holding.
    The company issuing the new shares must:
    (i) end up with more than 25% of the ordinary share capital (or a majority of the voting power) of the old company,
    OR
    (ii) make a general offer to shareholders in the other company with a condition that, if satisfied, would give the
    acquiring company control of the other company.
    The exchange must be for bona fide commercial reasons and must not have as its main purpose (or one of its main
    purposes) the avoidance of CGT or corporation tax. The acquiring company can obtain advance clearance from the
    Inland Revenue that the conditions will be met.
    If part of the offer consideration is in the form. of cash, a gain must be calculated using the part disposal rules. If the
    cash received is not more than the higher of £3,000 or 5% of the total value on takeover, then the amount received in
    cash can be deducted from the base cost of the securities under the small distribution rules.

  • 第14题:

    (b) (i) Advise Benny of the income tax implications of the grant and exercise of the share options in Summer

    Glow plc on the assumption that the share price on 1 September 2007 and on the day he exercises the

    options is £3·35 per share. Explain why the share option scheme is not free from risk by reference to

    the rules of the scheme and the circumstances surrounding the company. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) The share options
    There are no income tax implications on the grant of the share options.
    In the tax year in which Benny exercises the options and acquires the shares, the excess of the market value of the
    shares over the price paid, i.e. £11,500 ((£3·35 – £2·20) x 10,000) will be subject to income tax.
    Benny’s financial exposure is caused by the rule within the share option scheme obliging him to hold the shares for a
    year before he can sell them. If the company’s expansion into Eastern Europe fails, such that its share price
    subsequently falls to less than £2·20 before Benny has the chance to sell the shares, Benny’s financial position may be
    summarised as follows:
    – Benny will have paid £22,000 (£2·20 x 10,000) for shares which are now worth less than that.
    – He will also have paid income tax of £4,600 (£11,500 x 40%).

  • 第15题:

    (b) Compute Gloria’s total income tax and national insurance liability for 2006/07. (7 marks)


    正确答案:

     

  • 第16题:

    (ii) Assuming the relief in (i) is available, advise Sharon on the maximum amount of cash she could receive

    on incorporation, without triggering a capital gains tax (CGT) liability. (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) As Sharon is entitled to the full rate of business asset taper relief, any gain will be reduced by 75%. The position is
    maximised where the chargeable gain equals Sharon’s unused capital gains tax annual exemption of £8,500. Thus,
    before taper relief, the gain she requires is £34,000 (1/0·25 x £8,500).
    The amount to be held over is therefore £46,000 (80,000 – 34,000). Where part of the consideration is in the form
    of cash, the gain eligible for incorporation relief is calculated using the formula:
    Gain deferred           =                    Gain x value of shares issued/total consideration
    The formula is        manipulated on the following basis:
    £46,000                    =                     £80,000 x (shares/120,000)
    Shares/120,000     =                     £46,000/80,000
    Shares                     =                     £46,000 x 120,000/80,000
    i.e. £69,000.
    As the total consideration is £120,000, this means that Sharon can take £51,000 (£120,000 – £69,000) in cash
    without any CGT consequences.

  • 第17题:

    (c) Explain the capital gains tax (CGT) and income tax (IT) issues Paul and Sharon should consider in deciding

    which form. of trust to set up for Gisella and Gavin. You are not required to consider inheritance tax (IHT) or

    stamp duty land tax (SDLT) issues. (10 marks)

    You should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2005/06 apply throughout this question.


    正确答案:
    (c) As the trust is created in the settlors’ (Paul and Sharon’s) lifetime its creation will constitute a chargeable disposal for capital
    gains tax. Also, as the settlors and trustees are connected persons, the disposal will be deemed to be at market value, resulting
    in a chargeable gain of £80,000 (160,000 – 80,000). No taper relief will be available as the property is a non-business
    asset, and has been held for less than three years, but annual exemptions of £17,000 (2 x £8,500) will be available.
    However, in the case of a discretionary trust, gift hold over relief will be available. This is because the gift will constitute a
    chargeable lifetime transfer and because there is an immediate charge to inheritance tax (even though no tax is payable due
    to the nil rate band) relief is available if a specific accumulation and maintenance trust is used, as in this case the gift will
    qualify as a potentially exempt transfer and so gift relief would only be available in respect of business assets. The use of a
    basic discretionary trust will thus facilitate the deferral of an immediate capital gains tax charge of £25,200 (63,000 x 40%).
    If/when the property is disposed of, however, the trustees will pay capital gains tax on the deferred gain at the trust income
    tax rate of 40%, and have an annual exemption of only £4,250 (50% of the normal individual rate) available to them. The
    40% rate of tax and lower annual exemption rate also apply to chargeable gains arising in a specific accumulation and
    maintenance trust, as well as a basic discretionary trust.
    A chargeable disposal between connected persons will also arise for the purposes of capital gains tax if/when the property
    vests in a beneficiary, i.e. one or more of the beneficiaries becomes absolutely entitled to all or part of the income or capital
    of the trust. Gift hold over relief will again be available on all assets in the case of a discretionary trust, but only on business
    assets in the case of an accumulation and maintenance trust, except where a beneficiary becomes entitled to both income
    and capital at the same time.
    The trust will have taxable property income in the form. of net rents from its creation and in future years is also likely to have
    other investment income, probably in the form. of interest, to the extent that monies are retained in the trust. Whichever form
    of trust is used, the trustees will pay tax at the standard trust rate of 40% on income other than dividend income (32·5%),
    except to the extent of (1) the first £500 of taxable income, which is taxed at the rate that would otherwise apply to such
    income (i.e. 22% for non-savings (rental) income, 20% for savings income (interest) and 10% for dividends) but, only to the
    extent that it is not distributed; and (2) the legitimate trust management expenses, which are offsettable for the purposes of
    the higher trust tax rates against the income with the lowest rate(s) of normal tax and so bear tax only at that rate. The higher
    trust tax rate always applies to income that is distributed, other than to the extent that it has been treated as the settlor’s
    income, and taxed at that settlor’s marginal tax rate.
    As Paul and Sharon intend to create a trust for their unmarried minor (under 18) children, then even if the trust specifically
    excludes them from any benefit under the trust, the trust income will be treated as theirs for income tax purposes to the extent
    that it constitutes income paid for on behalf (including maintenance payments) of Gisella and Gavin; except where (1) the
    total income arising does not exceed £100 gross per annum, and (2) income is held for the benefit of a child under an
    accumulation and maintenance settlement, to the extent that it is not paid out.

  • 第18题:

    (ii) Advise Andrew of the tax implications arising from the disposal of the 7% Government Stock, clearly

    identifying the tax year in which any liability will arise and how it will be paid. (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Government stock is an exempt asset for the purposes of capital gains tax, however, as Andrew’s holding has a nominal
    value in excess of £5,000, a charge to income tax will arise under the accrued income scheme. This charge to income
    tax will arise in 2005/06, being the tax year in which the next interest payment following disposal falls due (20 April
    2005) and it will relate to the income accrued for the period 21 October 2004 to 14 March 2005 of £279 (145/182
    x £350). As interest on Government Stock is paid gross (unless the holder applies to receive it net), the tax due of £112
    (£279 x 40%) will be collected via the self-assessment system and as the interest was an ongoing source of income
    will be included within Andrew’s half yearly payments on account payable on 31 January and 31 July 2006.

  • 第19题:

    (ii) Advise Clifford of the capital gains tax implications of the alternative of selling the Oxford house and

    garden by means of two separate disposals as proposed. Calculations are not required for this part of

    the question. (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) The implications of selling the Oxford house and garden in two separate disposals
    The additional sales proceeds would result in an increase in Clifford’s capital gains and consequently his tax liability.
    When computing the gain on the sale of the house together with a small part of the garden, the allowable cost would
    be a proportion of the original cost. That proportion would be A/A + B where A is the value of the house and garden
    that has been sold and B is the value of the part of the garden that has been retained. Principal private residence relief
    and taper relief would be available in the same way as that set out in (i) above.
    When computing the gain on the sale of the remainder of the garden, the cost would be the original cost of the property
    less the amount used in computing the gain on the earlier disposal. Principal private residence relief would not be
    available as the land sold is not a dwelling house or part of one.

  • 第20题:

    (ii) Advise Mr Fencer of the income tax implications of the proposed financing arrangements. (2 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) The income tax implications of the proposed financing arrangements
    Mr Fencer has borrowed money from a UK bank in order to make a loan to Rapier Ltd, a close company. The interest
    paid by Mr Fencer to the bank will be an allowable charge on income as long as he continues to hold more than 5% of
    Rapier Ltd. Charges on income are deductible in arriving at an individual’s statutory total income.
    Mr Fencer will receive interest from Rapier Ltd net of 20% income tax. The gross amount of interest will be subject to
    income tax at either 10%, 20% or 40% depending on whether the income falls into Mr Fencer’s starting rate, basic rate
    or higher rate tax band. Mr Fencer will obtain a tax credit for the 20% income tax suffered at source.

  • 第21题:

    (b) The directors of Carver Ltd are aware that some of the company’s shareholders want to realise the value in their

    shares immediately. Accordingly, instead of investing in the office building or the share portfolio they are

    considering two alternative strategies whereby, following the sale of the company’s business, a payment will be

    made to the company’s shareholders.

    (i) Liquidate the company. The payment by the liquidator would be £126 per share.

    (ii) The payment of a dividend of £125 per share following which a liquidator will be appointed. The payment

    by the liquidator to the shareholders would then be £1 per share.

    The company originally issued 20,000 £1 ordinary shares at par value to 19 members of the Cutler family.

    Following a number of gifts and inheritances there are now 41 shareholders, all of whom are family members.

    The directors have asked you to attend a meeting to set out the tax implications of these two alternative strategies

    for each of the two main groups of shareholders: adults with shareholdings of more than 500 shares and children

    with shareholdings of 200 shares or less.

    Required:

    Prepare notes explaining:

    – the amount chargeable to tax; and

    – the rates of tax that will apply

    in respect of each of the two strategies for each of the two groups of shareholders ready for your meeting

    with the directors of Carver Ltd. You should assume that none of the shareholders will have any capital

    losses either in the tax year 2007/08 or brought forward as at 5 April 2007. (10 marks)

    Note:

    You should assume that the rates and allowances for the tax year 2006/07 will continue to apply for the

    foreseeable future.


    正确答案:

     

  • 第22题:

    (ii) Explain how the inclusion of rental income in Coral’s UK income tax computation could affect the

    income tax due on her dividend income. (2 marks)

    You are not required to prepare calculations for part (b) of this question.

    Note: you should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2006/07 and for the financial year to

    31 March 2007 will continue to apply for the foreseeable future.


    正确答案:
    (ii) The effect of taxable rental income on the tax due on Coral’s dividend income
    Remitting rental income to the UK may cause some of Coral’s dividend income currently falling within the basic rate
    band to fall within the higher rate band. The effect of this would be to increase the tax on the gross dividend income
    from 0% (10% less the 10% tax credit) to 221/2% (321/2% less 10%).
    Tutorial note
    It would be equally acceptable to state that the effective rate of tax on the dividend income would increase from 0%
    to 25%.

  • 第23题:

    (b) Prepare a reasoned explanation of how any capital gains tax arising in the UK on the sale of the paintings

    can be minimised. (2 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Minimising capital gains tax on the sale of the paintings
    Galileo will become resident and ordinarily resident from the date he arrives in the UK as he intends to stay for more than
    three years. Prior to that date he will be neither resident nor ordinarily resident such that he will not be subject to UK capital
    gains tax.
    Galileo should sell the paintings before he leaves Astronomeria; this will avoid UK capital gains tax completely.
    Tutorial note
    The gains would be taxable on the remittance basis if the paintings were sold after Galileo’s arrival in the UK. However, this
    would not help Galileo to minimise the capital gains tax due as he needs to bring the sales proceeds into the UK in order
    to purchase a house.