单选题What does President Bush think of tapping oil in ANWR?A It will increase America’s energy consumption.B It will exhaust the nation’s oil reserves.C It will help reduce the nation’s oil imports.D It will help secure the future of ANWR.

题目
单选题
What does President Bush think of tapping oil in ANWR?
A

It will increase America’s energy consumption.

B

It will exhaust the nation’s oil reserves.

C

It will help reduce the nation’s oil imports.

D

It will help secure the future of ANWR.


相似考题

3.共用题干 第三篇Oil and EconomyCould the bad old days of economic decline be about to return?Since OPEC agreed to supplycuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock,when prices quadrupled,and 1979一1980,when they also almost tripled.Both previous shocks resulted in double一digit inflation and global economic decline.So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports.Strengthening economic growth,at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere,could push the price higher still in the short term.Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s.In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s.In Europe,taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were,and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price.Energy conservation,a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption.Software,consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production.For each dollar of GDP(in constant prices)rich economies now use nearly 50%less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.S%of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980.On the other hand,oil-importing emerging economies一to which heavy industry has shifted一have become more energy一intensive,and so could be more seriously squeezed.One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that,unlike the rises in the 1970s,it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand.A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline.The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%,and in 1979 by almost 30%.The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries______.A:heavy industry becomes more energy-intensiveB:income loss mainly results from fluctuating crude oil pricesC:manufacturing industry has been seriously squeezedD:oil price changes have no significant impact on GDP

参考答案和解析
正确答案: B
解析:
观点题。C项同义替换了文章第一段第三句内容。题干中的“think of”替换原文中的“argue”,“reduce”近义替换原文中的“ease”;boost推动,激励,增长,energy independence能源独立,暗指不从其他国家进口能源,故选C。
更多“单选题What does President Bush think of tapping oil in ANWR?A It will increase America’s energy consumption.B It will exhaust the nation’s oil reserves.C It will help reduce the nation’s oil imports.D It will help secure the future of ANWR.”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    共用题干
    第三篇

    Oil and Economy

    Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return?Since OPEC agreed to supplycuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock,when prices quadrupled,and 1979一1980,when they also almost tripled.Both previous shocks resulted in double一digit inflation and global economic decline.So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
    The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports.Strengthening economic growth,at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere,could push the price higher still in the short term.
    Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s.In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s.In Europe,taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
    Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were,and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price.Energy conservation,a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption.Software,consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production.For each dollar of GDP(in constant prices)rich economies now use nearly 50%less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.S%of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980.On the other hand,oil-importing emerging economies一to which heavy industry has shifted一have become more energy一intensive,and so could be more seriously squeezed.
    One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that,unlike the rises in the 1970s,it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand.A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline.The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%,and in 1979 by almost 30%.

    We can draw a conclusion from the text that______.
    A:oil-price shocks are less shocking now
    B:inflation seems irrelevant to oil-price shocks
    C:energy conservation can keep down the oil prices
    D:the price rise of crude oil leads to the shrinking of heavy industry

    答案:A
    解析:
    根据题干可以定位到第一段的第二句话“Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December",说明由于石油输出国决定降低供给量,使得油价上升。所以本题的答案是B选项。D选项不是该现象的主要原因,因为OPEC的相关决定才是能够影响石油价格的走势的主要原因。
    根据题干可以定位到第三段的第三句话“In Europe , taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past",意思是说“在欧洲,税占汽油的零售价的4/5,因此相比以往,原油的价格变化对汽油零售价的影响不会很明显”。也就是说,税的增加会导致汽油价格的猛涨,而原油价格的变化带来的影响不会很大。本题的一个理解难点是“muted effect ",另外一个是“pump price "。 " mute”表示“哑巴的,无声的,沉默的”,和“effect”连用,表示 “影响不明显”;而“pump price”是一个很形象的说法," pump”指的是“泵”,这里很形象地用 " pump”指代“汽油零售”。根据上述分析,可以得出答案是D选项。
    根据本题的关键词“《经济展望》的估计”可以定位到“The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0 .25%一 0.5% of GDP",也就是说,油价的上涨对GDP的影响很小,只有“0.25%—0.5%”。因此我们可以得出答案为D选项。
    本题的几个选项需要通篇理解。文章第三段指出“油价的经济影响不会那么严重”,作者指出其原因是原油价格占汽油价格的比例不高,发达国家对石油的依赖减弱,此次涨价的背景不一样了。文章最后一段说这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的上涨不同,对各国的影响也基本没有反映出来,连物价都基本没有变动,也就是说,油价冲击已经不是那么可怕。所以答案是A选项。
    本文作者主要讲的就是这次油价上涨的影响不大。尤其是第三段和最后一段的第一句话,强调人们不必担心此次油价上涨,因为这一次的情况与“20世纪70年代” 不同。由此可见作者的态度是“乐观的”。

  • 第2题:

    共用题干
    第三篇

    Oil and Economy

    Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return?Since OPEC agreed to supplycuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock,when prices quadrupled,and 1979一1980,when they also almost tripled.Both previous shocks resulted in double一digit inflation and global economic decline.So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
    The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports.Strengthening economic growth,at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere,could push the price higher still in the short term.
    Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s.In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s.In Europe,taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
    Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were,and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price.Energy conservation,a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption.Software,consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production.For each dollar of GDP(in constant prices)rich economies now use nearly 50%less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.S%of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980.On the other hand,oil-importing emerging economies一to which heavy industry has shifted一have become more energy一intensive,and so could be more seriously squeezed.
    One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that,unlike the rises in the 1970s,it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand.A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline.The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%,and in 1979 by almost 30%.

    It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically in Europe if______.
    A:price of crude rises
    B:commodity prices rise
    C:consumption rises
    D:oil taxes rise

    答案:D
    解析:
    根据题干可以定位到第一段的第二句话“Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December",说明由于石油输出国决定降低供给量,使得油价上升。所以本题的答案是B选项。D选项不是该现象的主要原因,因为OPEC的相关决定才是能够影响石油价格的走势的主要原因。
    根据题干可以定位到第三段的第三句话“In Europe , taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past",意思是说“在欧洲,税占汽油的零售价的4/5,因此相比以往,原油的价格变化对汽油零售价的影响不会很明显”。也就是说,税的增加会导致汽油价格的猛涨,而原油价格的变化带来的影响不会很大。本题的一个理解难点是“muted effect ",另外一个是“pump price "。 " mute”表示“哑巴的,无声的,沉默的”,和“effect”连用,表示 “影响不明显”;而“pump price”是一个很形象的说法," pump”指的是“泵”,这里很形象地用 " pump”指代“汽油零售”。根据上述分析,可以得出答案是D选项。
    根据本题的关键词“《经济展望》的估计”可以定位到“The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0 .25%一 0.5% of GDP",也就是说,油价的上涨对GDP的影响很小,只有“0.25%—0.5%”。因此我们可以得出答案为D选项。
    本题的几个选项需要通篇理解。文章第三段指出“油价的经济影响不会那么严重”,作者指出其原因是原油价格占汽油价格的比例不高,发达国家对石油的依赖减弱,此次涨价的背景不一样了。文章最后一段说这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的上涨不同,对各国的影响也基本没有反映出来,连物价都基本没有变动,也就是说,油价冲击已经不是那么可怕。所以答案是A选项。
    本文作者主要讲的就是这次油价上涨的影响不大。尤其是第三段和最后一段的第一句话,强调人们不必担心此次油价上涨,因为这一次的情况与“20世纪70年代” 不同。由此可见作者的态度是“乐观的”。

  • 第3题:

    共用题干
    Thirst for Oil
    Worldwide every day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil.
    Most of the energy on Earth comes from the Sun.In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's surface each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it. So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle,this will change,and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.
    Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice.Coal is still used,mostly in power stations,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we started pumping up oil.
    Coal is the least efficient,unhealthiest and most environmentally damaging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.
    Today petroleum,a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to pro- duce petrol,diesel oil and various other chemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling automobiles.The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.
    The majority of oil comes from the Middle East,which has half of known reserves.But other significant sources include Russia,North America,Norway,Venezuela and the North Sea.
    Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge could be a major new US source,to reduce reliance on foreign imports.
    Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years,though opinions and estimates vary.We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades,when demand exceeds supply.As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,others such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead.Petrol could also be obtained from coal.
    Since we started using fossil fuels,we have released 400 billion tonnes of carbon,and burn- ing the entire reserves could eventually raise world temperatures by 13℃.Among other horrors, this would result in the destruction of all rainforests and the melting of all Arctic ice.

    What is NOT the result of consuming fossil fuels according to the last paragraph?
    A: The sea level will go up.
    B: The earth's temperature will be raised.
    C: Arctic ice will be melted.
    D: Rainforests will be destroyed.

    答案:A
    解析:
    答案在第一段最后一句中。这里的supplies指oil supplies。


    短文第二段告诉我们,木材曾经是主要燃料来源,然后被煤所替代;自人们开始采油后,对煤的需求下降了,但因为煤的储量远大于石油,它可能又会成为主要燃料,尽管它对环境最具破坏力。所以A、B、D均是作者的意思,而C不是。next to oil除石油以外。


    文章的第三段说,美国消耗全世界1/4的石油。


    答案在第五段第二句中。该段第一句说,地球上的燃料储量将在50年内耗尽,所以A不是正确选项;第三句的意思是,常规燃料的获取将变得困难,而不是不可获得,所以C也不是正确选项;D明显不是作者的意思。


    选项B、C、D都是最后一段中所表达的意思,所以A是正确选项。

  • 第4题:

    共用题干
    Thirst for Oil
    Worldwide every day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil.
    Most of the energy on Earth comes from the Sun.In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's surface each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it. So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle,this will change,and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.
    Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice.Coal is still used,mostly in power stations,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we started pumping up oil.
    Coal is the least efficient,unhealthiest and most environmentally damaging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.
    Today petroleum,a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to pro- duce petrol,diesel oil and various other chemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling automobiles.The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.
    The majority of oil comes from the Middle East,which has half of known reserves.But other significant sources include Russia,North America,Norway,Venezuela and the North Sea.
    Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge could be a major new US source,to reduce reliance on foreign imports.
    Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years,though opinions and estimates vary.We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades,when demand exceeds supply.As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,others such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead.Petrol could also be obtained from coal.
    Since we started using fossil fuels,we have released 400 billion tonnes of carbon,and burn- ing the entire reserves could eventually raise world temperatures by 13℃.Among other horrors, this would result in the destruction of all rainforests and the melting of all Arctic ice.

    What do experts say about the earth's fuel reserves?
    A: The earth's fuel reserves will be accessible for the next 50 years.
    B: There will soon be an energy crisis.
    C: Conventional reserves will soon become inaccessible.
    D: Fuel demand will decline.

    答案:B
    解析:
    答案在第一段最后一句中。这里的supplies指oil supplies。


    短文第二段告诉我们,木材曾经是主要燃料来源,然后被煤所替代;自人们开始采油后,对煤的需求下降了,但因为煤的储量远大于石油,它可能又会成为主要燃料,尽管它对环境最具破坏力。所以A、B、D均是作者的意思,而C不是。next to oil除石油以外。


    文章的第三段说,美国消耗全世界1/4的石油。


    答案在第五段第二句中。该段第一句说,地球上的燃料储量将在50年内耗尽,所以A不是正确选项;第三句的意思是,常规燃料的获取将变得困难,而不是不可获得,所以C也不是正确选项;D明显不是作者的意思。


    选项B、C、D都是最后一段中所表达的意思,所以A是正确选项。

  • 第5题:

    共用题干
    Thirst for Oil
    Worldwide every day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil. Most of the energy on Earth comes from the Sun. In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's surface each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it. So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle,this will change,and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.
    Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice. Coal is still used,mostly in power sta-tions,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we star-ted pumping up oil. Coal is the least efficient,unhealthiest and most environmentally dama-ging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.
    Today petroleum,a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to produce petrol,diesel oil and various other chemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling automobiles. The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.
    The majority of oil comes from the Middle East,which has half of known reserves. But other significant sources include Russia,North America,Norway,Venezuela and the North Sea. Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge could be a major new US source,to reduce reliance on foreign imports.
    Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years,though opinions and estimates vary. We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades, when demand exceeds supply. As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,oth-ers such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead. Petrol could also be obtained from coal.
    Since we started using fossil fuels,we have released 400 billion tonnes of carbon,and burning the entire reserves could eventually raise world temperatures by 13℃ .Among other horrors,this would result in the destruction of all rainforests and the melting of all
    Arctic ice.

    “…we will need to cure our addiction to oil.”Why does the author say so?
    A:Most of the energy on Earth comes from the Sun.
    B: Oil supply is increasing all the time.
    C: Demand for oil is increasing all the time.
    D: Oil supply is decreasing.

    答案:D
    解析:
    题干意为“为什么作者说‘……我们需要改变我们对石油的依赖性’?”该题考查考生对短文中某个句子意思的理解,首先找到该句在短文中所在的语境:Worldwide ev-ery day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil. Most of the en-ergy on Earth comes from the Sun. In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's sur-face each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it.So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle, this will change, and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.第一段最后一句意为“但是当供应缩减时,情况就会改变,我们需要改变我们对石油的依赖性”。由此可知“我们需要改变我们对石油的依赖性”的原因是石油供应缩减,因此D项“石油供应在缩减”是答案。
    题干意为“依据第二段内容来看,下面哪项内容不是短文中的作者想要表达的意思?”利用备选项中的细节信息词/短语wood , fuel of choice , coal , use of coal , most envi-ronmentally unfriendly fuel,oil, coal reserves作为定位线索,在第二段中快速识别与选项分别对应的句子:Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice.Coal is still used,mostly in power stations,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we started pumping up oil. Coal is the least efficient, unhealthiest and most environmentally damaging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.定位线索词分散在整个段落中,因此需要理解整个段落的意思。第一句提到“在蒸汽工业革命时代,高能煤成为首选燃料之前,燃木能满足大部分能源需求”。这与A项“燃木是煤作为燃料之前的首选燃料”意义一致;第二句提到“自从我们开始大量开采石油后,煤的使用就已经在逐渐减少”,这与B项“煤的使用在减少”意义一致;第三句提到“煤是使用效率最低,最不卫生,最不环保的化石燃料”,这与C项“煤对环境的危害性仅次于石油”不一致:依据短文内容来看煤对环境的危害排在第一位。因此该题答案为C。
    题干意为“哪个国家是最大的石油消耗国?”利用题干及备选项中的细节信息词/短语country , the biggest consumer of petroleum , the United States , Russia , Norway,Venezuela作为定位线索,在第三段找到相关句:Today petroleum, a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to produce petrol,diesel oil and various otherchemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling au-tomobiles. The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of green-house gas emissions.相关句(第三段最后一句)提到“美国消耗了世界上1/4的石油”,而除此以外短文中没有再提到其他的石油消耗国了。虽然选项C涉及到的挪威,选项D涉及到的委内瑞拉,选项B涉及到的俄罗斯在短文中也出现了,但它们都是作为石油产地国出现的,因此这三个选项都不是答案。所以答案为A。
    题干意为“关于地球上的燃料储备,专家们是怎么说的?”利用题干及备选项中的细节信息词/短语experts,earth's fuel reserves,next 50 years, energy crisis,convention-al reserves, fuel demand作为定位线索,在第五段中找到相关句:Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years, though opinions and estimates vary. We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades,when demand exceeds supply. As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,others such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead. Petrol could also be obtained from coal.定位线索词集中出现在第五段中。该段第一句提到“大多数专家预测人类将轻而易举地在50年内消耗掉现在所有的石油储备”。这与A项“地球的石油储备在下一个50年间仍然还将够用”不一致;第二句“未来的几十年间,当能源供不应求时我们会很快陷入能源危机”,这与B项“将很快出现能源危机”意思一致,因此选项B是答案,同时该句意思与D项“燃料需求将下降”不一致:短文提及“供不应求”,这意味着对能源的需求将会增加,而不是下降;第四句提到“当常规能源不容易获得时,代之使用的可能是诸如油页岩和沥青砂等能源”,短文提到“常规能源不容易获得”,不是说“不能获得”,因此C项“很快将不能获得常规能源”与短文内容不一致。

  • 第6题:

    单选题
    Advertisement: The most flavorful olives in the world are kalamata olives. The more kalamata olives used to make a bottle of olive oil, the more flavorful the oil, and no company buys more kalamata olives than Zorba’s Olive Oil. Therefore, when you buy Zorba’s Olive Oil, you’re buying the most flavorful olive oil available today.  The reasoning presented in the advertisement is flawed because it overlooks the possibility that:
    A

    Not all of Zorba’s competitors use kalamata olives in their oil.

    B

    Zorba’s sells more olive oil than any other company.

    C

    The most flavorful olive oil is not necessarily the best olive oil.

    D

    Because of bulk discounts, Zorba’s pays less per kilogram of kalamata olives than does its competitors.

    E

    The number of kalamata olives harvested every year is far less than the number of Spanish olives harvested every year.


    正确答案: B
    解析:
    推理过程中只强调Zorba公司购买卡拉马塔橄榄油的总量多,但是不能确定其每瓶油中橄榄油的量,故本题应选B项。

  • 第7题:

    单选题
    What’s the advantage of oily water separator that meets the requirement of MEPC 60(33) over MEPC 107(49)?()
    A

    more economic

    B

    larger capacity on oil treatment

    C

    less costive

    D

    more capable of separating emulsified oil


    正确答案: D
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第8题:

    问答题
    Passage 5  In the eyes of Edmund Daukoru, Nigeria’s oil minister and the current president of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), the price of oil is “ very low “. Compared with July, when it peaked at $ 78.40 a barrel, he is right. Since then, it has fallen by almost a quarter. On September 25th, it briefly slipped below $ 60 a barrel, its lowest level in six months. The same analysts who just a few short months ago were wondering about the effect of expensive oil on the world economy are now pondering the consequences of a slump.  That might prove premature. For one thing, Mr. Daukoru insists that OPEC will do something to stem the slide. At its last meeting, in mid-September, the group threatened to cut its output without notice if the price fell further. Saudi Arabia, for one, has been selling less oil of late. Ministers from different OPEC countries have been making different noises about whether a cut is desirable or likely, but all would be loath to see their revenues eroded by lower prices.  The world is still consuming almost as much oil as it can pump, so any reduction in supply could send prices skywards again. Both the relative calm of this year’s hurricane season and the diminishing threat of an interruption to Iran’s oil exports seem to have contributed to the recent fall. But should clouds gather over the Atlantic, or tempers rise in the Middle East, the price could jump again.  Moreover, the price of oil usually falls in the autumn, after the summer surge in petrol consumption has abated but before winter brings higher demand for heating oil. According to Sabine Schels, a commodity strategist at Merrill Lynch, seasonal swings in fuel prices are becoming more pronounced, thanks to a shortage of refining and storage capacity. At times of peak demand, she argues, the petrol price must rise high enough to prompt the reopening of old and inefficient refineries that would not normally be profitable. Those refineries, in turn, use up a lot more oil, pushing up its price too.  Oil markets will not escape this cycle, Miss Schels believes, until more refineries and storage tanks are built, and more fields developed—a process that can take years. Traders in the futures market also seem to believe that the oil price will rise again. Oil for delivery- in December 2007, for example, cost $ 68 on September 27th. The price is more than $ 60 for all months until December 2011.  Those bets could sour, however, if the American economy slows, as many suspect it is already doing. That would dent demand for oil, both from America itself and from countries that supply it with imports, such as China. Economists at HSBC, who expect a sharp American slowdown in 2007, now think Asian GDP growth will be 5.8% in 2007, against the consensus forecast of 6.3 %.  On the other hand, cheaper oil might help to mitigate any slowdown, in several ways. It would boost firms hit by higher energy prices, such as the struggling manufacturers of gas-guzzling cars. And it will relieve the pressure on consumers, at a time when many are worried that a stalling housing market may weigh on their spending. Economists at Morgan Stanley estimate that the fall in petrol prices from over $ 3 to $ 2.50 a gallon (the average is now $ 2.42) will alone have added some $ 78 billion to American purchasing power. Consumer confidence numbers, released on September 26th, were unexpectedly strong.  Above all, cheaper oil would ease concerns about inflation, and so reduce the need for central bankers to increase interest rates. American inflation slowed in August, thanks in part to smaller increases in the cost of energy and transport. That’s good news, except that it might simply prompt Americans to drive more.  1. What does the author mean by “that might prove premature”? (Para. 2) Why does he say so?  2. Paraphrase the sentence “those bets could sour, however, if the American economy slows” (Para. 6)  3. Why cheaper oil might help to “mitigate any slowdown”?

    正确答案: 【参考答案】
    1. The Oil price has fallen by almost a quarter. Lots of economic analysts start to ponder the consequences of a “slump” in the oil price. According to the author, this pondering might prove premature. OPEC will take measures, like cutting its output or selling less oil, to control the slide in oil price. The world’s consumption of oil is very large, if America suffers another natural disaster or the Middle East is inflicted by another turmoil, the price could jump again. Moreover, the price of oil usually falls in the autumn, but the winter would bring higher demand for heating oil. The reopening of old and inefficient refineries prompted by peak demand would push up the oil price too.
    2. Traders in the futures market believe that the oil price will rise again. Based on this prediction, a lot of money was invested in the building of more refineries and storage tanks. Those are what the author refers to as “bets”. But these bets may not earn money for the traders and investors. The U. S. economy may slow down, as it is already doing. That would reduce demand for oil, both from America and from countries that supply it with imports. And the cheap oil price will be the best help to mitigate any slowdown.
    3. The lower oil price will help to alleviate the economic slowdown in several ways. It could boost firms hit by higher energy prices, such as the struggling manufacturers of high gas- consumption cars. And it will relieve the pressure on consumers, and add a lot more money to American purchasing power. Above all, cheaper oil would ease concerns about inflation, and reduce the need for central bankers to increase interest rates.
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第9题:

    单选题
    Oil Pollution Regulations require any transfer or discharge of oil or oily mixtures to be recorded in the ()
    A

    bridge log

    B

    Master’s log

    C

    engine room log

    D

    oil record book


    正确答案: A
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第10题:

    单选题
    The Alaska Governor has taken the following steps in response to the Prudhoe Bay oil field shutdown EXCEPT ______.
    A

    initiating investigation into BP’s liability for the state’s losses caused

    B

    calling hearings into BP’s maintenance practices

    C

    imposing a state hiring freeze

    D

    taking measures to reduce oil consumption in the state


    正确答案: D
    解析:
    事实细节的找寻和判断。关于阿拉斯加州长对Pmdhoe Bay油田关闭所采取的措施,录音首句指出其imposed a state hiring freeze,对应选项A。而该州长同时表示他将会support hearings into BP’s maintenance practices,与选项B表达内容相一致。接着录音中提到该州长会让阿拉斯加州的检察总长investigate whether the state could hold the oil giant fully accountable for the state’s losses,即调查该石油巨头是否应对本州损失负所有的责任,因此选项A也正确。可见,唯有D项的内容在文中未被提及。

  • 第11题:

    单选题
    Those against oil drilling ANWR argue that _____.
    A

    it will drain the oil reserves in the Alaskan region

    B

    it can do little to solve U.S. energy problem

    C

    it can cause serious damage to the environment

    D

    it will not have much commercial value


    正确答案: A
    解析:
    细节题。选项B同义替换了尾段首句。“do little to solve”替换“do virtually nothing to ease”;a drop in the bucket意为“沧海一粟”。A、C项未在文中提及:D项为根据文中“consumers would wait up to a decade to gain any profit”设置的干扰项。

  • 第12题:

    单选题
    We learn from the second paragraph that the American oil industry _____.
    A

    shows little interest in tapping oil in ANWR

    B

    expects to stop oil imports from Saudi Arabia

    C

    tends to exaggerate America’s reliance on foreign oil

    D

    believes that drilling for ANWR will produce high yields


    正确答案: B
    解析:
    细节题。D项同义替换了根据第二段前两句内容。“believes”替换原文中的“goes with”。首句中的“the range”指上文的“from 3 billion to 16 billion barrels”,“the high end”指“16 billion barrels”。选项A与第二段意思相反;B项中的“stop”与第二段第二句中的“cutback on”不符;C项与第二段第二句的后半句意思相反。

  • 第13题:

    共用题干
    第三篇

    Oil and Economy

    Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return?Since OPEC agreed to supplycuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock,when prices quadrupled,and 1979一1980,when they also almost tripled.Both previous shocks resulted in double一digit inflation and global economic decline.So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
    The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports.Strengthening economic growth,at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere,could push the price higher still in the short term.
    Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s.In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s.In Europe,taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
    Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were,and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price.Energy conservation,a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption.Software,consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production.For each dollar of GDP(in constant prices)rich economies now use nearly 50%less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.S%of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980.On the other hand,oil-importing emerging economies一to which heavy industry has shifted一have become more energy一intensive,and so could be more seriously squeezed.
    One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that,unlike the rises in the 1970s,it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand.A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline.The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%,and in 1979 by almost 30%.

    The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is______.
    A:global inflation
    B:reduction in supply
    C:fast growth in economy
    D:Iraq's suspension of exports

    答案:B
    解析:
    根据题干可以定位到第一段的第二句话“Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December",说明由于石油输出国决定降低供给量,使得油价上升。所以本题的答案是B选项。D选项不是该现象的主要原因,因为OPEC的相关决定才是能够影响石油价格的走势的主要原因。
    根据题干可以定位到第三段的第三句话“In Europe , taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past",意思是说“在欧洲,税占汽油的零售价的4/5,因此相比以往,原油的价格变化对汽油零售价的影响不会很明显”。也就是说,税的增加会导致汽油价格的猛涨,而原油价格的变化带来的影响不会很大。本题的一个理解难点是“muted effect ",另外一个是“pump price "。 " mute”表示“哑巴的,无声的,沉默的”,和“effect”连用,表示 “影响不明显”;而“pump price”是一个很形象的说法," pump”指的是“泵”,这里很形象地用 " pump”指代“汽油零售”。根据上述分析,可以得出答案是D选项。
    根据本题的关键词“《经济展望》的估计”可以定位到“The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0 .25%一 0.5% of GDP",也就是说,油价的上涨对GDP的影响很小,只有“0.25%—0.5%”。因此我们可以得出答案为D选项。
    本题的几个选项需要通篇理解。文章第三段指出“油价的经济影响不会那么严重”,作者指出其原因是原油价格占汽油价格的比例不高,发达国家对石油的依赖减弱,此次涨价的背景不一样了。文章最后一段说这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的上涨不同,对各国的影响也基本没有反映出来,连物价都基本没有变动,也就是说,油价冲击已经不是那么可怕。所以答案是A选项。
    本文作者主要讲的就是这次油价上涨的影响不大。尤其是第三段和最后一段的第一句话,强调人们不必担心此次油价上涨,因为这一次的情况与“20世纪70年代” 不同。由此可见作者的态度是“乐观的”。

  • 第14题:

    The Norwegian Government has tried to ______.

    A. encourage the oil companies to discover new oil sources
    B. prevent oil companies employing people from northern Norway
    C. help the oil companies solve many of their problems
    D. keep the oil industry to something near its present size

    答案:D
    解析:
    通过文章第一段容易排除A、B、C项,本题正确答案为D。

  • 第15题:

    共用题干
    Thirst for Oil
    Worldwide every day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil.
    Most of the energy on Earth comes from the Sun.In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's surface each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it. So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle,this will change,and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.
    Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice.Coal is still used,mostly in power stations,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we started pumping up oil.
    Coal is the least efficient,unhealthiest and most environmentally damaging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.
    Today petroleum,a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to pro- duce petrol,diesel oil and various other chemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling automobiles.The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.
    The majority of oil comes from the Middle East,which has half of known reserves.But other significant sources include Russia,North America,Norway,Venezuela and the North Sea.
    Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge could be a major new US source,to reduce reliance on foreign imports.
    Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years,though opinions and estimates vary.We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades,when demand exceeds supply.As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,others such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead.Petrol could also be obtained from coal.
    Since we started using fossil fuels,we have released 400 billion tonnes of carbon,and burn- ing the entire reserves could eventually raise world temperatures by 13℃.Among other horrors, this would result in the destruction of all rainforests and the melting of all Arctic ice.

    Which country is the biggest consumer of petroleum?
    A: The United States.
    B: Russia.
    C: Norway.
    D: Venezuela.

    答案:A
    解析:
    答案在第一段最后一句中。这里的supplies指oil supplies。


    短文第二段告诉我们,木材曾经是主要燃料来源,然后被煤所替代;自人们开始采油后,对煤的需求下降了,但因为煤的储量远大于石油,它可能又会成为主要燃料,尽管它对环境最具破坏力。所以A、B、D均是作者的意思,而C不是。next to oil除石油以外。


    文章的第三段说,美国消耗全世界1/4的石油。


    答案在第五段第二句中。该段第一句说,地球上的燃料储量将在50年内耗尽,所以A不是正确选项;第三句的意思是,常规燃料的获取将变得困难,而不是不可获得,所以C也不是正确选项;D明显不是作者的意思。


    选项B、C、D都是最后一段中所表达的意思,所以A是正确选项。

  • 第16题:

    共用题干
    Thirst for Oil
    Worldwide every day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil. Most of the energy on Earth comes from the Sun. In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's surface each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it. So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle,this will change,and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.
    Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice. Coal is still used,mostly in power sta-tions,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we star-ted pumping up oil. Coal is the least efficient,unhealthiest and most environmentally dama-ging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.
    Today petroleum,a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to produce petrol,diesel oil and various other chemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling automobiles. The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.
    The majority of oil comes from the Middle East,which has half of known reserves. But other significant sources include Russia,North America,Norway,Venezuela and the North Sea. Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge could be a major new US source,to reduce reliance on foreign imports.
    Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years,though opinions and estimates vary. We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades, when demand exceeds supply. As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,oth-ers such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead. Petrol could also be obtained from coal.
    Since we started using fossil fuels,we have released 400 billion tonnes of carbon,and burning the entire reserves could eventually raise world temperatures by 13℃ .Among other horrors,this would result in the destruction of all rainforests and the melting of all
    Arctic ice.

    Which of the following statements is NOT meant by the author,according to the second paragraph?
    A:Wood was the fuel of choice before coal.
    B: The use of coal is declining.
    C: Coal is the most environmentally unfriendly fuel next to oil.
    D: Coal reserves are plentiful and will be likely to become the major fuel of choice.

    答案:C
    解析:
    题干意为“为什么作者说‘……我们需要改变我们对石油的依赖性’?”该题考查考生对短文中某个句子意思的理解,首先找到该句在短文中所在的语境:Worldwide ev-ery day,we devour the energy equivalent of about 200 million barrels of oil. Most of the en-ergy on Earth comes from the Sun. In fact enough energy from the Sun hits the planet's sur-face each minute to cover our needs for an entire year,we just need to find an efficient way to use it.So far the energy in oil has been cheaper and easier to get at. But as supplies dwindle, this will change, and we will need to cure our addiction to oil.第一段最后一句意为“但是当供应缩减时,情况就会改变,我们需要改变我们对石油的依赖性”。由此可知“我们需要改变我们对石油的依赖性”的原因是石油供应缩减,因此D项“石油供应在缩减”是答案。
    题干意为“依据第二段内容来看,下面哪项内容不是短文中的作者想要表达的意思?”利用备选项中的细节信息词/短语wood , fuel of choice , coal , use of coal , most envi-ronmentally unfriendly fuel,oil, coal reserves作为定位线索,在第二段中快速识别与选项分别对应的句子:Burning wood satisfied most energy needs until the steam-driven industrial revolution,when energy-dense coal became the fuel of choice.Coal is still used,mostly in power stations,to cover one quarter of our energy needs,but its use has been declining since we started pumping up oil. Coal is the least efficient, unhealthiest and most environmentally damaging fossil fuel,but could make a comeback,as supplies are still plentiful:its reserves are five times larger than oil's.定位线索词分散在整个段落中,因此需要理解整个段落的意思。第一句提到“在蒸汽工业革命时代,高能煤成为首选燃料之前,燃木能满足大部分能源需求”。这与A项“燃木是煤作为燃料之前的首选燃料”意义一致;第二句提到“自从我们开始大量开采石油后,煤的使用就已经在逐渐减少”,这与B项“煤的使用在减少”意义一致;第三句提到“煤是使用效率最低,最不卫生,最不环保的化石燃料”,这与C项“煤对环境的危害性仅次于石油”不一致:依据短文内容来看煤对环境的危害排在第一位。因此该题答案为C。
    题干意为“哪个国家是最大的石油消耗国?”利用题干及备选项中的细节信息词/短语country , the biggest consumer of petroleum , the United States , Russia , Norway,Venezuela作为定位线索,在第三段找到相关句:Today petroleum, a mineral oil obtained from below the surface of the Earth and used to produce petrol,diesel oil and various otherchemical substances,provides around 40% of the world's energy needs,mostly fuelling au-tomobiles. The US consumes a quarter of all oil,and generates a similar proportion of green-house gas emissions.相关句(第三段最后一句)提到“美国消耗了世界上1/4的石油”,而除此以外短文中没有再提到其他的石油消耗国了。虽然选项C涉及到的挪威,选项D涉及到的委内瑞拉,选项B涉及到的俄罗斯在短文中也出现了,但它们都是作为石油产地国出现的,因此这三个选项都不是答案。所以答案为A。
    题干意为“关于地球上的燃料储备,专家们是怎么说的?”利用题干及备选项中的细节信息词/短语experts,earth's fuel reserves,next 50 years, energy crisis,convention-al reserves, fuel demand作为定位线索,在第五段中找到相关句:Most experts predict we will exhaust easily accessible reserves within 50 years, though opinions and estimates vary. We could fast reach an energy crisis in the next few decades,when demand exceeds supply. As conventional reserves become more difficult to access,others such as oil shales and tar sands may be used instead. Petrol could also be obtained from coal.定位线索词集中出现在第五段中。该段第一句提到“大多数专家预测人类将轻而易举地在50年内消耗掉现在所有的石油储备”。这与A项“地球的石油储备在下一个50年间仍然还将够用”不一致;第二句“未来的几十年间,当能源供不应求时我们会很快陷入能源危机”,这与B项“将很快出现能源危机”意思一致,因此选项B是答案,同时该句意思与D项“燃料需求将下降”不一致:短文提及“供不应求”,这意味着对能源的需求将会增加,而不是下降;第四句提到“当常规能源不容易获得时,代之使用的可能是诸如油页岩和沥青砂等能源”,短文提到“常规能源不容易获得”,不是说“不能获得”,因此C项“很快将不能获得常规能源”与短文内容不一致。

  • 第17题:

    共用题干
    第三篇

    Oil and Economy

    Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return?Since OPEC agreed to supplycuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than$10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock,when prices quadrupled,and 1979一1980,when they also almost tripled.Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline.So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
    The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports.Strengthening economic growth,at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere,could push the price higher still in the short term.
    Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the l970s.In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the l970s.In Europe,taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
    Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were,and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price.Energy conservation,a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption.Software,consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production.For each dollar of GDP(inconstant prices)in rich economies now use nearly 50%less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with$13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25%~0.5%of GDP.That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand,oil-importing emerging economies一to which heavy industry has shifted一have become more energy-intensive,and so could be more seriously squeezed.
    One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that,unlike the rises in the 1970s,it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand.A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline.The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago.In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%,and in 1979 by almost 30%.

    The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is_______.
    A:global inflation
    B:reduction in supply
    C:fast growth in economy
    D:Iraq's suspension of exports

    答案:B
    解析:
    根据题干可以定位到第一段的第二句话“Since OPEC agreed to supplycuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost$26 a barrel,up from less than $10 last December",说明由于石油输出国决定降低供给量,使得油价上升,所以本题的答案是B选项。D选项不是该现象的主要原因,因为OPEC的相关决定才是能够影响石油价格走势的主要原因。
    根据题干可以定位到第三段的第三句话“In Europe , taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price,so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past",意思是说“在欧洲,税占汽油零售价的4/5,因此相比以往,原油的价格变化对汽油的影响不会很明显‘”。也就是说税的增加会导致汽油价格的猛涨,而原油价格的变化所带来的影响不会很大。本题一个理解的难度是muted effect,另外一个是 pump p rice0 mute表示“哑巴的、无声的、沉默的”,和effect连用表示“影响不明显”;而pump price是一个很形象的说法,pump指的是“泵”,这里很形象地用pump指代汽油。根据上述分析,可以得出答案是D选项。
    根据本题的关键词The estimates in Economic Outlook可以定位到第四段 "The OECD estimates in its latest Economic outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25%~0.5% of GDP"。也就是说,油价的上涨对GDP的影响很小,只占0.25%~0.5%。因此我们可以得出答案是D选项。
    通观全文,文章第三段指出“油价的经济影响不会那么严重”,作者指出其原因是“原油价格占汽油价格的比例不高,发达国家对石油的依赖减弱,此次涨价的背景不一样了”。文章最后一段说到这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的上涨不同,对各国的影响也基本没有反映出来,连物价都基本没有变动,也就是说,油价冲击已经不是那么可怕,所以答案是A选项。
    本文作者主要讲的就是这次油价上涨的影响不大。尤其是第三段和最后一段的第一句话,强调人们不必担心此次油价上涨,因为这一次的情况与20世纪70年代不同。由此可见作者的态度是乐观的。

  • 第18题:

    单选题
    If oil density were greater than water’s, the oil separator ().
    A

    did work

    B

    would work well

    C

    didnt work

    D

    wouldnt work


    正确答案: A
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第19题:

    问答题
    Directions:In this section, there is one passage followed by 5 questions. Read the passage carefully, then answer the questions in a maximum of 10 words. Remember to write the answers on the Answer Sheet.  Questions 1-5 are based on the following passage.  Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-1980, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?  The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.  Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.  Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (in constant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies—to which heavy industry has shifted—have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.  One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The economist’s commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.  Questions:  1.What is the main reason for the latest rise of oil price?  2.What are the results of the 1970s’ oil shock?  3.It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if ________.  4.According to the passage, reduction in oil consumption is due to ________, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries.  5.According to the passage, compared with those in the 1970s, oil-price shocks are ________ now.

    正确答案:
    1.Reduction in supply. / Supply-cuts 依据文章第一段第二句话:“Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December”,可知答案为Reduction in supply或Supply-cuts。
    2.Double-digit inflation and global economic decline 文章第一段第四句话提到“Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline”,其中both previous shocks指前文提到的1973年和1979到1980年间的oil shock,可知答案为Double-digit inflation and global economic decline。
    3.oil taxes rise 文章第三段第三句话提到“In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past”,意为:在欧洲,汽油的零售价中税占到五分之四,因此税的增加会导致汽油价格(成比例地)猛涨,而原油价格的变化带来的影响不会很大。由此可知如果油税上调,汽油零售价格将急剧上涨。因此答案为oil taxes rise。
    4.energy conservation 文章第四段第二句提到“Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption”,由此可知答案为energy conservation。
    5.less shocking 文章最后一段强调这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的油价上涨不同,它并不是在普遍日用品价格上涨和全球需求过剩的背景下发生的,也就没有70年代那一次那么可怕,因此答案为less shocking。
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第20题:

    问答题
    Practice 3  Energy-saving vehicles were part of the Green Transportation Festival in the US in 2003. The vehicles shown were designed to reduce America’s dependence on oil and help the environment.  There are exhibits of cars and buses at the festivals. Most of them use little gas or use another kind of fuel such as natural gas. People are also urged to consider simpler ways of getting around, such as walking, biking and using public transportation systems.  The United States has less than five per cent of the world’s population, but uses about twenty-five per cent of the world’s oil. More than half of the nation’s oil is imported. Most of it goes to transportation.  Festival organizers said progress in technology was making it possible for Americans to reduce their dependence on oil. That is because the kinds of energy-saving vehicles are increasing. Efforts to reduce oil imports in the United States would also have important environmental benefits. The burning of oil as fuel is responsible for gases blamed for climate change. When gasoline is burned in cars, it also pollutes the air. This leads to many health problems.

    正确答案: 【参考译文】
    2003年在美国举行的“绿色交通节”上展出了节能车,这类车辆的设计目的是减少美国对石油的依赖及改善环境。
    交通节期间展出了轿车和公交车,它们大多使用少量汽油或其他燃料一如天然气。展会同时呼吁人们考虑更为简单的出行方式,如步行、骑自行车或使用公共交通系统。
    美国人12不足世界总人口的5%,却使用了约25%的世界石油产量,其中一半以上是进口的;大部分进口石油用于交通运输。
    交通节的组织者说,科技的进步可以使美国人减少对石油的依赖,因为这类节能型汽车的产量在不断增加。减少石油进口对美国将会产生重要的环保效益。燃油产生了导致气候变暖的温室气体,饱受指责。燃烧的汽油还会污染空气,这导致了很多健康问题。
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第21题:

    单选题
    When preparing a ship for heavy weather,fuel oil day tanks should be().
    A

    pumped overboard to calm the seas

    B

    drained to the lower hull to reduce free surfaces

    C

    filled to ensure that sufficient fuel oil is available during a lengthy emergency

    D

    partially drained to increase free surfaces in order to reduce motions


    正确答案: D
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第22题:

    单选题
    What does President Bush think of tapping oil in ANWR?
    A

    It will increase America’s energy consumption.

    B

    It will exhaust the nation’s oil reserves.

    C

    It will help reduce the nation’s oil imports.

    D

    It will help secure the future of ANWR.


    正确答案: D
    解析:
    观点题。C项同义替换了文章第一段第三句内容。题干中的“think of”替换原文中的“argue”,“reduce”近义替换原文中的“ease”;boost推动,激励,增长,energy independence能源独立,暗指不从其他国家进口能源,故选C。

  • 第23题:

    单选题
    It can be learned from the passage that oil exploitation beneath ANWR’s frozen each _____.
    A

    involves a lot of technological problems

    B

    remains a controversial issue

    C

    is expected to get under way soon

    D

    will enable the U.S. to be oil independent


    正确答案: B
    解析:
    细节题。在开采ANWR的石油问题上,美国石油业和环保主义者各持己见。文中采用一般现在时,并且使用了大量表示可能性的情态动词,表明是否开采ANWR的地下石油还没有定论,故选B。由于“much bargaining over leases”和“environmental permits and regulatory review”并非技术问题,故排除A项。C项缺乏依据。D项对布什的看法过于绝对化,故排除。

  • 第24题:

    单选题
    Lube oil filters remove contaminants more efficiently if the oil being filtered is ().
    A

    under high pressure

    B

    under low pressure

    C

    heated to reduce viscosity

    D

    cooled to increase viscosity


    正确答案: C
    解析: 暂无解析