问答题Even the most uninformed student of climate change could tell you that the solution to global warming is to alleviate global greenhouse gas emissions, and fast. But the problem is that the sheer amount of greenhouse gases we’ve already pumped into the

题目
问答题
Even the most uninformed student of climate change could tell you that the solution to global warming is to alleviate global greenhouse gas emissions, and fast. But the problem is that the sheer amount of greenhouse gases we’ve already pumped into the atmosphere has irreversibly bound us to a certain amount of warming over the next several decades. No matter what we do, we’ll have to adapt to it.  (1)_______________. Already precipitation patterns seem to be changing, making some drier areas—like the arid American southwest —even drier, and rainy regions even wetter. As warmer temperatures creep northward, so do insects and other pests that are adapted to the heat. The results can be distressing. The tiny mountain pine beetle, which infests pine trees in the Rocky Mountain region, used to be controlled by freezing winters. But as temperatures have warmed over the past decade, the mountain pine beetle’s territory has spread, destroying millions of acres of Canadian pines.  (2)_______________Generations of American conservationists have fought to preserve wild- life and to keep nature pristine in the face of a growing population and pollution. To a remarkable extent, they’ve succeeded—almost 16% of the entire landmass of the U.S. is protected, and the Endangered Species Acthas helped save countless animals from extinction.  (3)_______________. What good is a wildlife reserve if the protected animals can’t live there, because climate change pushes them out? What difference does it make to defend trees from logging, if global warming will allow a new pest to destroy whole forests?  (4)_______________. Last week the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy brought together conservation leaders from around the U.S. to discuss how to cope with warming, trying to work out a new framework for the biggest challenge facing conservation.  (5)_______________. So too is the scale required to properly adapt to climate change, which will almost certainly continue for decades into the future. “Climate change will affect agriculture, water resources, forestry, transportation, waste management, energy generation, national security, immigration patterns, fisheries, food security, you name it,” said Lara Hansen. “We need to change the way we allocate resources, plan economies and protect livelihoods.”  That means that the way we’ve been carrying out conservation—picking the right land spaces and playing goalie—won’t work anymore, as climate change keeps moving the target. Regardless of what we do, the changes will be coming fast. We need to begin cutting our carbon immediately, but we need to adapt now as well. The world is changing because of us; to save what’s left, we’ll have to change too.  [A] But global warming threatens to change all that, by altering the very foundation on which the conservation movement was built.  [B] Global warming was already having “profound effects” in the American West, and that the future would bring increased drought, heat waves, rainstorms, extinctions and more.  [C] That means climate change isn’t a problem for tomorrow; the effects are happening now.  [D] The conference was fruitful, if a bit depressing. What’s clear is that the sheer speed of the changes already taking place due to warming—like the mountain pine beetle infestation—are catching us off guard.  [E] Conservationists will have to work even harder, trying to minimize non climate-related threats to land and species.  [F] The pine beetle infestation is just one example of global warming’s present danger. It also represents the unique challenges that warming will pose for land conservation managers on the front lines of the battle against it.  [G] The answer is to adapt the way we practice wildlife and land conservation to climate change. There’s a term for this—adaptive management.(此文选自Time2008年刊)

相似考题

1.共用题干 Lakes,Too,Feel Global WarmingThere's no doubt:In the last few decades,the average temperature on Earth has been higher than it has been in hundreds of years.Around the world,people are starting to measure the effects of global warming一 and trying to figure out what to do about it.Scientists recently used satellites to study the temperatures of lakes around the world,and they found that lakes are heating up.Between 1985 and 2009,satellites recorded the nighttime temperatures of the sur- faces of 167 lakes.During those 24 years,the lakes got warmer by an average of about 0.045 degreeCelsius per year.In some places,lakes have been warming by as much as 0.10 degree Celsius per year. At that rate,a lake may warm by a full degree Celsius in just 10 years.That difference may seem small一you might not even notice it in your bath.But in a lake,slightly warmer temperatures could mean more algae(水藻),and algae can make the lake poisonous to fish.The study shows that in some regions,lakes are warming faster than the air around them.This is impor- tant because scientists often use measurements of air temperature to study how Earth is warming. By using lake temperatures as well,scientists can get a better picture of global warming. The scientists say data on lakes give scientists a new way to measure the impact of climate change around the world.That's going to be useful,since no country is too big or too small to ignore climate change.Scientists aren't the only ones concerned.Everyone who lives on Earth is going to be affected by the rapid warming of the planet. Many world leaders believe we might be able to do something about it,especially by reducing theamount of greenhouse(温室)gases we put into the air.That's why the United Nations started the Framework Convention on Climate Change,or UNFCCC. Every year the convention meets,and representatives from countries around the world gather to talk about climate change and discuss global solutions to the challenges of a warming world.Global warming is less threatening to small countries.A:RightB:WrongC:Not mentioned

2.Text 1 Giant corporations often claim to be"green,"pointing to programs they've undertaken aimed at being environmentally conscious.But sometimes these efforts don't really amount to much.They can be no more than'igrcenwashing,"a public relations effort that doesn't represent any fundamental shift in thinking.But such a change may actually be going on among several of the world's largest fossil fuel companies,namcs such as ExxonMobil,Shell,and BP.One of the biggest reasons:pressure from the companies'sharcholdcrs.Investors arc asking corporations to make more transparent the effects climate change will have on their businesses,as well as explain what they are doing to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.While sharcholdcr motivcs are cerlainly aimed at helping in the worldwide fight against global warming,they also represent a practical need to better understand a company's prospects.If the burning of oil and gas is grcaily curtailed as a result of the December 2015 intemational Paris climate agreement,for example,how might that affect the bottom line of a corporation whose chief source of revenue is extracting and selling carbon-emitting oil and gas?Or,conversely,how is a company planning to take advantage of the business opportunities that emerge from a shift away from fossil fuels?Climate Action 100+,for example,is a shareholder action group that is asking corporations to make stronger commitments to meeting the 80 percent cut in carbon emissions proposed by the Paris agreement signed two years ago by nearly 200 nations.Some 225 investment groups who manage more than S26.3 trillion have signed on in support.Last week,intemational energy giant ExxonMobil said it will step up its reporting to shareholders and the public about the impacts climate change will have on its business,including any expected increased risks.The new policy follows a vote by ExxonMobil investors at the company's annual meeting in May that called for a yearly assessment of the effects of climate change on the company.The new position represents a sea change for ExxonMobil,which until the early 2000s had disputed the need to take action on climate change.Around the world national govemments are shaping new policies in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will not allow global temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius.In the U,S.,individual states and cities are pursuing lawsuits against companies that fail to deal responsibly with greenhouse gas emissions,which they contend harm the public.22.Which of the following is right about shareholders?A.They explained their steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. B.They are reluctant to help fight against global warming. C.They have made some corporations'thought changed. D.They pointed out their understanding of companies'prospects.

3.Text 1 Giant corporations often claim to be"green,"pointing to programs they've undertaken aimed at being environmentally conscious.But sometimes these efforts don't really amount to much.They can be no more than'igrcenwashing,"a public relations effort that doesn't represent any fundamental shift in thinking.But such a change may actually be going on among several of the world's largest fossil fuel companies,namcs such as ExxonMobil,Shell,and BP.One of the biggest reasons:pressure from the companies'sharcholdcrs.Investors arc asking corporations to make more transparent the effects climate change will have on their businesses,as well as explain what they are doing to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.While sharcholdcr motivcs are cerlainly aimed at helping in the worldwide fight against global warming,they also represent a practical need to better understand a company's prospects.If the burning of oil and gas is grcaily curtailed as a result of the December 2015 intemational Paris climate agreement,for example,how might that affect the bottom line of a corporation whose chief source of revenue is extracting and selling carbon-emitting oil and gas?Or,conversely,how is a company planning to take advantage of the business opportunities that emerge from a shift away from fossil fuels?Climate Action 100+,for example,is a shareholder action group that is asking corporations to make stronger commitments to meeting the 80 percent cut in carbon emissions proposed by the Paris agreement signed two years ago by nearly 200 nations.Some 225 investment groups who manage more than S26.3 trillion have signed on in support.Last week,intemational energy giant ExxonMobil said it will step up its reporting to shareholders and the public about the impacts climate change will have on its business,including any expected increased risks.The new policy follows a vote by ExxonMobil investors at the company's annual meeting in May that called for a yearly assessment of the effects of climate change on the company.The new position represents a sea change for ExxonMobil,which until the early 2000s had disputed the need to take action on climate change.Around the world national govemments are shaping new policies in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will not allow global temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius.In the U,S.,individual states and cities are pursuing lawsuits against companies that fail to deal responsibly with greenhouse gas emissions,which they contend harm the public.24.What's ExxonMobil's attitude toward taking action on climate change?A.Biased. B.Objective. C.Indifferent. D.Supportive.

4.共用题干 Lakes,Too,Feel Global WarmingThere's no doubt:In the last few decades,the average temperature on Earth has been higher than it has been in hundreds of years.Around the world,people are starting to measure the effects of global warming一 and trying to figure out what to do about it.Scientists recently used satellites to study the temperatures of lakes around the world,and they found that lakes are heating up.Between 1985 and 2009,satellites recorded the nighttime temperatures of the sur- faces of 167 lakes.During those 24 years,the lakes got warmer by an average of about 0.045 degreeCelsius per year.In some places,lakes have been warming by as much as 0.10 degree Celsius per year. At that rate,a lake may warm by a full degree Celsius in just 10 years.That difference may seem small一you might not even notice it in your bath.But in a lake,slightly warmer temperatures could mean more algae(水藻),and algae can make the lake poisonous to fish.The study shows that in some regions,lakes are warming faster than the air around them.This is impor- tant because scientists often use measurements of air temperature to study how Earth is warming. By using lake temperatures as well,scientists can get a better picture of global warming. The scientists say data on lakes give scientists a new way to measure the impact of climate change around the world.That's going to be useful,since no country is too big or too small to ignore climate change.Scientists aren't the only ones concerned.Everyone who lives on Earth is going to be affected by the rapid warming of the planet. Many world leaders believe we might be able to do something about it,especially by reducing theamount of greenhouse(温室)gases we put into the air.That's why the United Nations started the Framework Convention on Climate Change,or UNFCCC. Every year the convention meets,and representatives from countries around the world gather to talk about climate change and discuss global solutions to the challenges of a warming world.Lakes seem to be warming faster in Asia.A:RightB:WrongC:Not mentioned

更多“问答题Even the most uninformed student of climate change could tell you that the solution to global warming is to alleviate global greenhouse gas emissions, and fast. But the problem is that the sheer amount of greenhouse gases we’ve already pumped into the ”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    Text 1 Giant corporations often claim to be"green,"pointing to programs they've undertaken aimed at being environmentally conscious.But sometimes these efforts don't really amount to much.They can be no more than'igrcenwashing,"a public relations effort that doesn't represent any fundamental shift in thinking.But such a change may actually be going on among several of the world's largest fossil fuel companies,namcs such as ExxonMobil,Shell,and BP.One of the biggest reasons:pressure from the companies'sharcholdcrs.Investors arc asking corporations to make more transparent the effects climate change will have on their businesses,as well as explain what they are doing to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.While sharcholdcr motivcs are cerlainly aimed at helping in the worldwide fight against global warming,they also represent a practical need to better understand a company's prospects.If the burning of oil and gas is grcaily curtailed as a result of the December 2015 intemational Paris climate agreement,for example,how might that affect the bottom line of a corporation whose chief source of revenue is extracting and selling carbon-emitting oil and gas?Or,conversely,how is a company planning to take advantage of the business opportunities that emerge from a shift away from fossil fuels?Climate Action 100+,for example,is a shareholder action group that is asking corporations to make stronger commitments to meeting the 80 percent cut in carbon emissions proposed by the Paris agreement signed two years ago by nearly 200 nations.Some 225 investment groups who manage more than S26.3 trillion have signed on in support.Last week,intemational energy giant ExxonMobil said it will step up its reporting to shareholders and the public about the impacts climate change will have on its business,including any expected increased risks.The new policy follows a vote by ExxonMobil investors at the company's annual meeting in May that called for a yearly assessment of the effects of climate change on the company.The new position represents a sea change for ExxonMobil,which until the early 2000s had disputed the need to take action on climate change.Around the world national govemments are shaping new policies in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will not allow global temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius.In the U,S.,individual states and cities are pursuing lawsuits against companies that fail to deal responsibly with greenhouse gas emissions,which they contend harm the public.23.The word"curtailed"(Para.3)most probably means

    A.limited.
    B.forbidden.
    C.improved.
    D.affected.

    答案:A
    解析:
    词汇理解题。根据定位词定位到文章第三段。根据2015年12月的巴黎国际气候协议,石油和天然气的燃烧量肯定是由于受到了限制而减少的,故A项为正确答案。【干扰排除】根据以上分析可知,B项“禁止”、C项“提高”和D项“影响”与原文不符,故排除。

  • 第2题:

    Text 1 Giant corporations often claim to be"green,"pointing to programs they've undertaken aimed at being environmentally conscious.But sometimes these efforts don't really amount to much.They can be no more than'igrcenwashing,"a public relations effort that doesn't represent any fundamental shift in thinking.But such a change may actually be going on among several of the world's largest fossil fuel companies,namcs such as ExxonMobil,Shell,and BP.One of the biggest reasons:pressure from the companies'sharcholdcrs.Investors arc asking corporations to make more transparent the effects climate change will have on their businesses,as well as explain what they are doing to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.While sharcholdcr motivcs are cerlainly aimed at helping in the worldwide fight against global warming,they also represent a practical need to better understand a company's prospects.If the burning of oil and gas is grcaily curtailed as a result of the December 2015 intemational Paris climate agreement,for example,how might that affect the bottom line of a corporation whose chief source of revenue is extracting and selling carbon-emitting oil and gas?Or,conversely,how is a company planning to take advantage of the business opportunities that emerge from a shift away from fossil fuels?Climate Action 100+,for example,is a shareholder action group that is asking corporations to make stronger commitments to meeting the 80 percent cut in carbon emissions proposed by the Paris agreement signed two years ago by nearly 200 nations.Some 225 investment groups who manage more than S26.3 trillion have signed on in support.Last week,intemational energy giant ExxonMobil said it will step up its reporting to shareholders and the public about the impacts climate change will have on its business,including any expected increased risks.The new policy follows a vote by ExxonMobil investors at the company's annual meeting in May that called for a yearly assessment of the effects of climate change on the company.The new position represents a sea change for ExxonMobil,which until the early 2000s had disputed the need to take action on climate change.Around the world national govemments are shaping new policies in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will not allow global temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius.In the U,S.,individual states and cities are pursuing lawsuits against companies that fail to deal responsibly with greenhouse gas emissions,which they contend harm the public.21.Big corporations are far away from"green"because

    A.they rarely do anything meaningful.
    B.they don't have any fundamental shift.
    C.they have poor public relations.
    D.they lack fundamental changes in thinking

    答案:D
    解析:
    事实细节题。根据定位词定位到文章第一段。第一段最后一句说明了大公司离“绿色”还很远的原因.即他们所做的努力只不过是“漂绿”,仅仅是为了公共关系,并不代表任何思维方面的根本转变.D项与此文义相符,故D项为正确答案。【干扰排除】原文说它们所开展的环保项目没有什么意义,但是并来说它们很少做有意义的事情,A项属于无中生有;原文说它们在思想上未做出根本转变.B项中“任何”一阋范围过大;C项原文未提及。故均排除。

  • 第3题:

    资料:Earlier this month, presidents Barack Obama of the US and Xi Jinping of China made an important symbolic gesture when they committed their countries, the two largest greenhouse gas emitters, to the Paris climate agreement. It was the clearest signal yet to investors worldwide that they need to think about the implications of global warming for their portfolios.
    On Friday afternoon there was an example of what that might mean Mr Obama’s administration issued an order temporarily blocking construction on a section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline. The move was a response to local concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe about potential damage to historic sites and the threats of oil spills. But it is the global issue of climate change that had raised the profile of Dakota Access, making it into a cause celebre for US environmental campaigners. Bill McKibben of 350.org, which played a key role in the successful effort to stop the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, has suggested that Mr Obama could block Dakota Access permanently, on the grounds that it would exacerbate the threat of climate change.
    Last month, the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality issued new guidance for federal agencies, making clear that their decisions should take into account “the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change”, and quantify their consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Dakota Access is intended to carry crude oil 1,172 miles from North Dakota, a centre of the US shale revolution, to Illinois, en route to refineries around America. The case that it would add to global greenhouse gas emission will be harder to make than for Keystone XL, which would have brought crude from the high-emitting oil sands of western Canada, but the campaigners are certain to try.
    If Dakota Access is stopped, it will have a significant impact not just on energy Transfer Partners, the company leading the project, but on all North Dakota oil producers and their customers, who will be forced to use more expensive rail transport.
    Climate change is now an unavoidable business issue. In an excellent paper last week, BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, set out some of the ways that investors can reduce their exposure to the risks and benefit from the opportunities that it creates. The paper is a landmark in the rising awareness of the issue among mainstream investors. It is one thing when a philanthropic fund with assets of a few hundred million takes a stand on climate issues, quite another when the warnings come from a company with about $4.9tn under management. As BlackRock points out, investors’ personal views on climate science are irrelevant. Enough governments and businesses are convinced by the scientific consensus that the threat is real, and are driving regulatory and technological changes that interested in you.
    六If the world is to reduce the risk of catastrophic global warming to acceptable levels, there will have to be a huge reallocation of capital away from fossil fuels and toward low-emission energy sources. That shift has begun, but it needs to go much further. The transition is not straightforward: for as long as oil is the lifeblood of the world’s transport, pipelines will be needed. But when investors and boards make decisions about projects like Dakota Access, they will have to consider their impact on greenhouse gas emissions. The financial consequences of climate change can no longer be ignored.

    Which one of the following is not the measure taken by US government to deal with climate change? ( ).

    A.Stop the Dakota Access permanently
    B.Join the Paris climate agreement.
    C.Require federal agencies to take climate change into consideration when making decisions.
    D.Suspend the construction of Dakota Access.

    答案:A
    解析:
    本题考查的是细节理解。
    【关键词】not; measure; US government; deal with climate change
    【主题句】第一段Earlier this month, presidents Barack Obama of the US and Xi Jinping of China made an important symbolic gesture when they committed their countries, the two largest greenhouse gas emitters, to the Paris climate agreement. 本月早些时候,美国总统奥巴马和中国习近平摆出了一个重要的象征性姿态,承诺全球最大的两个温室气体排放国将履行《巴黎协定》。
    第二段 Mr Obama’s administration issued an order temporarily blocking construction on a section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline.(奥巴马政府下令暂停达科他石油管道一个区段的建设。)
    第三段Last month, the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality issued new guidance for federal agencies, making clear that their decisions should take into account “the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change”... 上个月,白宫环境质量委员会向联邦机构发布了新的指导意见,明确他们的决定应考虑到“拟议行动对气候变化的潜在影响”。
    【解析】本题问“以下哪项不是美国政府采取的用于应对气候变化的措施?”。选项A意为“永久停止达科他管道建设”;选项B意为“加入巴黎气候协议”;选项C意为“要求联邦机构在作出决定时考虑到气候变化”;选项D意为“停止建设达科他管道建设”。根据主题句可知美国政府只是暂时禁止达科他石油管道一个区段的建设,不是永久禁止。故选项A错误。其他选项均涉及。

  • 第4题:

    资料:Earlier this month, presidents Barack Obama of the US and Xi Jinping of China made an important symbolic gesture when they committed their countries, the two largest greenhouse gas emitters, to the Paris climate agreement. It was the clearest signal yet to investors worldwide that they need to think about the implications of global warming for their portfolios.
    On Friday afternoon there was an example of what that might mean Mr Obama’s administration issued an order temporarily blocking construction on a section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline. The move was a response to local concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe about potential damage to historic sites and the threats of oil spills. But it is the global issue of climate change that had raised the profile of Dakota Access, making it into a cause celebre for US environmental campaigners. Bill McKibben of 350.org, which played a key role in the successful effort to stop the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, has suggested that Mr Obama could block Dakota Access permanently, on the grounds that it would exacerbate the threat of climate change.
    Last month, the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality issued new guidance for federal agencies, making clear that their decisions should take into account “the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change”, and quantify their consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Dakota Access is intended to carry crude oil 1,172 miles from North Dakota, a centre of the US shale revolution, to Illinois, en route to refineries around America. The case that it would add to global greenhouse gas emission will be harder to make than for Keystone XL, which would have brought crude from the high-emitting oil sands of western Canada, but the campaigners are certain to try.
    If Dakota Access is stopped, it will have a significant impact not just on energy Transfer Partners, the company leading the project, but on all North Dakota oil producers and their customers, who will be forced to use more expensive rail transport.
    Climate change is now an unavoidable business issue. In an excellent paper last week, BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, set out some of the ways that investors can reduce their exposure to the risks and benefit from the opportunities that it creates. The paper is a landmark in the rising awareness of the issue among mainstream investors. It is one thing when a philanthropic fund with assets of a few hundred million takes a stand on climate issues, quite another when the warnings come from a company with about $4.9tn under management. As BlackRock points out, investors’ personal views on climate science are irrelevant. Enough governments and businesses are convinced by the scientific consensus that the threat is real, and are driving regulatory and technological changes that interested in you.
    六If the world is to reduce the risk of catastrophic global warming to acceptable levels, there will have to be a huge reallocation of capital away from fossil fuels and toward low-emission energy sources. That shift has begun, but it needs to go much further. The transition is not straightforward: for as long as oil is the lifeblood of the world’s transport, pipelines will be needed. But when investors and boards make decisions about projects like Dakota Access, they will have to consider their impact on greenhouse gas emissions. The financial consequences of climate change can no longer be ignored.

    What can we learn from Paragragh 5? ( )

    A.BlackRock is philanthropic fund that cares about climate change.
    B.Investors can take the opportunities brought by climate change.
    C.The threat brought by climate change still needs scientific evidence.
    D.What investors think of the climate change is very important.

    答案:B
    解析:
    本题考查的是推理判断。
    【关键词】learn; Paragraph5
    【主题句】第五段Climate change is now an unavoidable business issue. In an excellent paper last week, BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, set out some of the ways that investors can reduce their exposure to the risks and benefit from the opportunities that it creates. The paper is a landmark in the rising awareness of the issue among mainstream investors. 气候变化现在是一个不可避免的商业问题。上周一份出色的报告中,全球最大的基金管理公司贝莱德(BlackRock)列举了一些投资者可以减少面临风险以及从创造的机会中受益的方法。 这份文件是主流投资者对这一问题意识提高的一个里程碑。 It is one thing when a philanthropic fund with assets of a few hundred million takes a stand on climate issues, quite another when the warnings come from a company with about $4.9tn under management. As BlackRock points out, investors’ personal views on climate science are irrelevant. Enough governments and businesses are convinced by the scientific consensus that the threat is real, and are driving regulatory and technological changes that interested in you. 一个拥有数亿资产的慈善基金对气候问题持有立场是一回事,而对一家管理着约4.9万美元的公司的警告又是另一回事了。 正如贝莱德指出的那样,投资者对气候科学的个人观点是无关紧要的。 许多政府和企业已经达成科学共识,即威胁是真实的,并且正在推动对您感兴趣的法规和技术变革。
    【解析】本题问“从第五段我们了解到什么?”。选项A意为“BlackRock是关心气候变化的慈善基金”;选项B意为“投资者可以把握气候变化带来的机遇”;选项C意为“气候变化带来的威胁仍然需要科学证据”;选项D意为“投资者对气候变化的看法非常重要”。
    根据主题句,选项A未提及,选项C已经达成共识,故错误,选项D与原文不符,选项B符合题意。

  • 第5题:

    共用题干
    Lakes,Too,Feel Global Warming

    There's no doubt;In the last few decades,the average temperature on Earth has been higher than it has
    been in hundreds of years,Around the world,people are starting to measure the effects of global warming一
    and trying to figure out what to do about it.
    Scientists recently used satellites to study the temperatures of lakes around the world,and they found
    that lakes are heating up.Between 1985 and 2009,satellites recorded the nighttime temperatures of the sur-
    faces of 167 lakes.During those 24 years,the lakes got warmer一by an average of about 0.045 degree
    Celsius per year.
    In some places,lakes have been warming by as much as 0.10 degree Celsius per year. At that rate,a
    lake may warm by a full degree Celsius in just 10 years?That difference may seem imull一you might not
    even notice it in your bath.But in a lake,slightly warmer temperatures could mean more algae(水藻),and
    algae can make the lake poisonous(有毒的)to fish.
    The study shows that in some regions,lakes are warming faster than the air around them.This is impor-
    tant because scientists often use measurements of air temperature to study how Earth is warming.By using
    lake temperatures as well,scientists can get a better picture of global warming.The scientists say data on
    lakes give scientists a new way to measure the impact of climate change around the world.
    That’s going to be useful,since no country is too big or too small to ignore climate change.Scientists
    aren't the only ones concerned、 Everyone who lives on Earth is going to be affected by the rapid warming of
    the planet.Many world leaders believe we might be able to do something about it,especially by reducing the
    amount of greenhouse(温室)gases we put into the air.
    That’s why the United Nations started the F'ramework Convention on Climate Change,or UNFCCC.
    Every year the convention meets,and representatives from countries around the world gather to talk about
    climate change and discuss global solutions to the challenges of a warming world.

    UNFCCC’s annual meeting will be held in Mexico this year.
    A:Right
    B:Wrong
    C:Not mentioned

    答案:C
    解析:
    由第二段可知,科学家从1985年开始记录湖水温度的:到现在还不到30年。
    由第二段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    湖水在亚洲温暖的快在文中没有信息依据。
    由第三段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    由第四段第二句话可知,科学家经常用空气温度来研究地球变暖的问题,说明他们关 注的主要焦点在于空气温度。
    由第五段的内容可知,地球上的任何人都应关心全球变暖的问题。
    在文中没有提及今年的UNFCCC在哪举行。第3部分:概括大意与完成句子

  • 第6题:

    共用题干
    New research from NASA scientists suggests emissions of black soot after the way sunlight re- flects off snow.According to a computer simulation,black soot may be responsible for 25 percent of observed global warming over the past century. Soot in the higher latitudes(维度)of the Earth,where ice is more common , absorbs more of the sun's energy and warmth than an icy,white background. Dark-colored black carbon,or soot, absorbs sunlight,while lighter colored ice reflects sunlight.
    Soot in areas with snow and ice may play an important role in climate change.Also,if snow and ice covered areas begin melting,the warming effect increase,as the soot becomes more con-centrated on the snow surface.“This provides a positive feedback,as glaciers and ice sheets melt, they tend to get even dirtier.”said Dr. James Hansen,a researcher at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies,New York.
    Hansen found soot's effect on snow albedo(反照率),which may be contributing to trends to-ward early springs in the Northern Hemisphere,such as thinning Arctic sea ice and melting glac-iers permafrost. Soot also is believed to play a role in changes in the atmosphere above the oceans and land.
    “Black carbon reduces the amount of energy reflected by snow back into space,thus heating the snow surface more than if there were no black carbon,”Hansen said. Soot's increased absorp-tion of solar energy is especially effective in warming the world's climate.“ This forcing is unusual-ly effective,causing twice as much global warming as a carbon-dioxide forcing of the same magni-tude.”Hansen noted.
    Hansen cautioned,although the role of soot in altering global climate is substantial,it does not alter the fact that greenhouse gases are the primary cause of climate warming during the past century .Such gases are expected to be the largest climate forcing for the rest of the century.
    The researchers found that observed warming in the Northern Hemisphere was large in the winter and spring at middle and high latitudes. These observations were coherent with the researchers' climate model situations,which showed some of the largest warming effects occurred when there were heavy snow cover and sufficient sunlight.

    What is the main cause of climate warming during the past century?
    A: Soot.
    B: Snow.
    C: Greenhouse gases.
    D:.Wind.

    答案:C
    解析:
    文章第二段最后一句“…while lighter colored ice reflects sunlight.”说浅色的冰反射太阳光,而黑色的煤烟灰并不反射。其他三项在文章一、二段都有提到,故本题选C。


    根据第五段首句“Black carbon reduces the amount of energy reflected by snow back in-to space, thus heating the snow surface more than if there were no black carbon,”可知,黑炭覆盖的地区有更强烈的加热效果。故本题选B。


    第五段中的“This forcing”指的是其前面所说的“Soot's increased absorption of solar energy”。因此本题选B。


    根据第六段“…it does not alter the fact that greenhouse gases are the primary cause of climate warming during the past century.”可知,温室气体是上世纪气候变暖的首要原因,故选C。


    由最后一段最后一句“…which showed some of the largest warming effects occurred when there were heavy snow cover and sufficient sunlight.”知,部分大规模的温室效应发生在有厚雪覆盖层和阳光强烈的地方。故本题选C。

  • 第7题:

    共用题干
    Lakes,Too,Feel Global Warming

    There's no doubt;In the last few decades,the average temperature on Earth has been higher than it has
    been in hundreds of years,Around the world,people are starting to measure the effects of global warming一
    and trying to figure out what to do about it.
    Scientists recently used satellites to study the temperatures of lakes around the world,and they found
    that lakes are heating up.Between 1985 and 2009,satellites recorded the nighttime temperatures of the sur-
    faces of 167 lakes.During those 24 years,the lakes got warmer一by an average of about 0.045 degree
    Celsius per year.
    In some places,lakes have been warming by as much as 0.10 degree Celsius per year. At that rate,a
    lake may warm by a full degree Celsius in just 10 years?That difference may seem imull一you might not
    even notice it in your bath.But in a lake,slightly warmer temperatures could mean more algae(水藻),and
    algae can make the lake poisonous(有毒的)to fish.
    The study shows that in some regions,lakes are warming faster than the air around them.This is impor-
    tant because scientists often use measurements of air temperature to study how Earth is warming.By using
    lake temperatures as well,scientists can get a better picture of global warming.The scientists say data on
    lakes give scientists a new way to measure the impact of climate change around the world.
    That’s going to be useful,since no country is too big or too small to ignore climate change.Scientists
    aren't the only ones concerned、 Everyone who lives on Earth is going to be affected by the rapid warming of
    the planet.Many world leaders believe we might be able to do something about it,especially by reducing the
    amount of greenhouse(温室)gases we put into the air.
    That’s why the United Nations started the F'ramework Convention on Climate Change,or UNFCCC.
    Every year the convention meets,and representatives from countries around the world gather to talk about
    climate change and discuss global solutions to the challenges of a warming world.

    A slight temperature increase in a lake could be harmful to fish.
    A:Right
    B:Wrong
    C:Not mentioned

    答案:A
    解析:
    由第二段可知,科学家从1985年开始记录湖水温度的:到现在还不到30年。
    由第二段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    湖水在亚洲温暖的快在文中没有信息依据。
    由第三段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    由第四段第二句话可知,科学家经常用空气温度来研究地球变暖的问题,说明他们关 注的主要焦点在于空气温度。
    由第五段的内容可知,地球上的任何人都应关心全球变暖的问题。
    在文中没有提及今年的UNFCCC在哪举行。第3部分:概括大意与完成句子

  • 第8题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    A Sunshade(遮阳伞)for the Planet

    Even with the best will in the world,reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming. It has become clear that even if we take the most strong measures to control emissions, the uncertainties in our climate models still leave open the possibility of extreme warming and rises in sea level. At the same time,resistance by governments and special interest groups makes it quite possible that the actions suggested by climate scientists might not be implemented soon enough.
    Fortunately,if the worst comes to the worst,scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves. For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem. Until now,that is a growing number of researchers are taking a fresh look at large-scale"geoengineering"projects that might be used to counteract global warming."I use the analogy of methadone,"says Stephen Schneider,a climate researcher at Stanford University in California who was among the first to draw attention to global warming."If you have a heroin addict,the correct treatment is hospitalization,and a long rehab. But if they absolutely refuse,methadone is better than heroin."
    Basically the idea is to apply"sunscreen"to the whole planet. One astronomer has come up with a radical plan to cool Earth:launch trillions of feather-light discs into space,where they would form a vast cloud that would block the sun's rays.It's controversial,but recent studies suggest there are ways to deflect just enough of the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface to counteract the warming produced by the greenhouse effect. Global climate models show that blocking just 1.8 percent of the incident energy in the sun's rays would cancel out the warming effects produced by a doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.That could be crucial,because even the most severe emissions control measures being proposed would leave us with a doubling of carbon dioxide by the end of this century,and that would last for at least a century more.

    What is Stephen Schneider's idea of preventing global warming?
    A:To ask governments to take stronger measures.
    B:To increase the sunlight reaching the Earth.
    C:To apply sunscreen to the Earth.
    D:To decrease greenhouse gases.

    答案:C
    解析:
    题干意思为:通过前两段,作者认为……第一段第一句:Even with the best will in the world , reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming.即使怀着世间最美好的愿望,减少碳排放也不会阻止全球变暖。第二段第一句:Fortunately , if the worst comes to the worst , scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves.幸运的是,如果情况越来越糟,科学家们还有一些应对措施。通过这两句可以明显地看出,作者对限制排放是持反对态度的,认为限排不能解决问题,所以选择B项。
    题干意思为:科学家们反对人们对他们的选择进行讨论,因为他们不想让人们知道……第二段第二句:For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem.他们反对人们讨论这些选择的主要原因是担心引起自满情绪,从而使得从根本上解决问题的努力受挫。经过分析,只有C选项正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider提到毒瘾和美沙酮疗法的用意何在?第二段最后一句:If you have a heroin addict , the correct treatment is hospitalization , and a long rehab.But if they absolutely refuse , methadone is better than heroin.如果你有毒瘾,那么最好的方法是住院治疗,进行长时间恢复,但是如果都不管用的话,美沙酮总比海洛因强。显然他是要说明 Methadone is an effective way to treat a hard heroin addict(美沙酮对毒瘾很深的人是有治疗效果的)。因此选项A正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider阻止全球变暖的方法是什么? 文中最后一段第一句:Basically the idea is to apply " sunscreen" to the whole planet.这种方法基本上是要为整个地球涂上一层“遮光剂”。经过分析,选项C正确。
    题干意思为:根据最后一段,对于遮光剂的有效性的表述,哪一句是错误的?D选项It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere(减少大气层温室气体排放)正好与该方法冲突,所以该项不正确。

  • 第9题:

    共用题干
    Lakes,Too,Feel Global Warming

    There's no doubt;In the last few decades,the average temperature on Earth has been higher than it has
    been in hundreds of years,Around the world,people are starting to measure the effects of global warming一
    and trying to figure out what to do about it.
    Scientists recently used satellites to study the temperatures of lakes around the world,and they found
    that lakes are heating up.Between 1985 and 2009,satellites recorded the nighttime temperatures of the sur-
    faces of 167 lakes.During those 24 years,the lakes got warmer一by an average of about 0.045 degree
    Celsius per year.
    In some places,lakes have been warming by as much as 0.10 degree Celsius per year. At that rate,a
    lake may warm by a full degree Celsius in just 10 years?That difference may seem imull一you might not
    even notice it in your bath.But in a lake,slightly warmer temperatures could mean more algae(水藻),and
    algae can make the lake poisonous(有毒的)to fish.
    The study shows that in some regions,lakes are warming faster than the air around them.This is impor-
    tant because scientists often use measurements of air temperature to study how Earth is warming.By using
    lake temperatures as well,scientists can get a better picture of global warming.The scientists say data on
    lakes give scientists a new way to measure the impact of climate change around the world.
    That’s going to be useful,since no country is too big or too small to ignore climate change.Scientists
    aren't the only ones concerned、 Everyone who lives on Earth is going to be affected by the rapid warming of
    the planet.Many world leaders believe we might be able to do something about it,especially by reducing the
    amount of greenhouse(温室)gases we put into the air.
    That’s why the United Nations started the F'ramework Convention on Climate Change,or UNFCCC.
    Every year the convention meets,and representatives from countries around the world gather to talk about
    climate change and discuss global solutions to the challenges of a warming world.

    Lakes seem to be warming faster in Asia.
    A:Right
    B:Wrong
    C:Not mentioned

    答案:C
    解析:
    由第二段可知,科学家从1985年开始记录湖水温度的:到现在还不到30年。
    由第二段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    湖水在亚洲温暖的快在文中没有信息依据。
    由第三段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    由第四段第二句话可知,科学家经常用空气温度来研究地球变暖的问题,说明他们关 注的主要焦点在于空气温度。
    由第五段的内容可知,地球上的任何人都应关心全球变暖的问题。
    在文中没有提及今年的UNFCCC在哪举行。第3部分:概括大意与完成句子

  • 第10题:

    共用题干
    Global Warming

    1 Smoke is clouding our view of global warming,protecting the planet from perhaps
    three-quarters of the greenhouse(温室)effect.That might sound like good news, but
    experts say that as the cover diminishes in coming decades,we are facing a dramatic
    increase of warming that could be two or even three times as great as official best
    guesses.
    2 This was the dramatic conclusion reached last week at a workshop in Dahlem,Berlin,
    where top atmospheric scientists got together,including Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen
    and Swedish scientist Bert Bolin,former chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on
    Climate Change(IPCC).
    3 IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols(浮质)of smoke and other
    particles from burning rainforest,crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and
    counteracting the warming effect of carbon dioxide(二氧化物)emissions.Until now,they
    reckoned that aerosols reduced greenhouse warming by perhaps a quarter,cutting
    increases by 0.2℃.So the 0.6℃of warming over the past century would have been 0.8℃
    without aerosols.
    4 But the Berlin workshop concluded that the real figure is even higher一aerosols may have
    reduced global warming by as much as three-quarters,cutting increases by 1.8℃.If so,
    the good news is that aerosols have prevented the world getting almost two degrees warmer
    than it is now.But the bad news is that the climate system is much more sensitive to
    greenhouse gases than previously guessed.
    5 As those gases are expected to continue accumulating in the atmosphere while aerosols
    stabilize or fall,that means"dramatic consequences for estimates of future climate
    change",the scientists agreed in a draft report from the workshop.

    The increase of greenhouse gases_________.
    A:will influence future climate change
    B:was somewhat surprising
    C:will rise rapidly
    D:was known to us all
    E:was much higher than had been expected
    F:will drop dramatically

    答案:A
    解析:

  • 第11题:

    共用题干
    Global Warming

    1.Smoke is clouding our view of global warming,protecting the planet from perhaps threequarters of the greenhouse(温室)effect. That might sound like good news,but experts say that as the cover diminishes in coming decades,we are facing a dramatic increase of warming that could be two or even three times as great as official best guesses.
    2.This was the dramatic conclusion reached last week at a workshop in Dahlem,Berlin,where top atmospheric scientists got together,including Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen and Swedish scientist Bert Bolin,former chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC).
    3. IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols(浮质)of smoke and other partidles from burning rainforest,crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and counteracting the warming effect of carbon dioxide(二氧化物)emissions. Until now,they reckoned that aerosols reduced greenhouse warming by perhaps a quarter,cutting increases by 0.2℃.So the 0.6℃of warming over the past century would have been 0.8℃without aerosols.
    4.But the Berlin workshop concluded that the real figure is even higher—aerosols may have reduced global warming by as much as three-quarters,cutting increases by 1.8℃.If so,the good news is that aerosols have prevented the world getting almost two degrees warmer than it is now. But the bad news is that the climate system is much more sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously guessed.
    5.As those gases are expected to continue accumulating in the atmosphere while aerosols stabilize or fall,that means"dramatic consequences for estimates of future climate change",the scientists agreed in a draft report from the workshop.

    Paragraph 4_______
    A:Atmospheric Scientists
    B:The Calculations Made at the Berlin Workshop
    C:The Previous Calculations of the Effect of Aerosols
    D:The Scientists' Agreement
    E:The Authoritative Conclusion
    F: Greenhouse Gases

    答案:B
    解析:
    文章第二段指出,结论是由杰出的大气科学家得出的。“杰出的科学家” 即权威科学家。
    文章第三段提到了对浮质所产生的影响进行的计算,这个计算先于第四段所提及的计算,因而,被称为“先前的”计算。
    柏林研讨会得出的结论是:真正的数字比这还要高——浮质可能已经把全球气候变暖的程度减少了四分之三。因此,本段讲的是柏林研讨会的佑算。
    第五段讲的是科学家们关于浮质对气候变化影响的一致性的看法。
    见文章第一段。
    本题翻译:“柏林讨论会的结论有点令人吃惊”。因为这个结论认为:“浮质可能已经把全球气候变暖的程度减少了四分之三。”
    文章第四段指出:然而,柏林研讨会得出的结论是,真正的数字比这还要高,“比这还要高”是说比第三段推测的数字要高,也就比人们预期的要高。
    文章的最后一段提到了这个问题:温室气体在大气里不断聚积对未来气候变化的预测产生惊人的后果。

  • 第12题:

    共用题干
    Global Warming

    1 Smoke is clouding our view of global warming,protecting the planet from perhaps
    three-quarters of the greenhouse(温室)effect.That might sound like good news, but
    experts say that as the cover diminishes in coming decades,we are facing a dramatic
    increase of warming that could be two or even three times as great as official best
    guesses.
    2 This was the dramatic conclusion reached last week at a workshop in Dahlem,Berlin,
    where top atmospheric scientists got together,including Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen
    and Swedish scientist Bert Bolin,former chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on
    Climate Change(IPCC).
    3 IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols(浮质)of smoke and other
    particles from burning rainforest,crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and
    counteracting the warming effect of carbon dioxide(二氧化物)emissions.Until now,they
    reckoned that aerosols reduced greenhouse warming by perhaps a quarter,cutting
    increases by 0.2℃.So the 0.6℃of warming over the past century would have been 0.8℃
    without aerosols.
    4 But the Berlin workshop concluded that the real figure is even higher一aerosols may have
    reduced global warming by as much as three-quarters,cutting increases by 1.8℃.If so,
    the good news is that aerosols have prevented the world getting almost two degrees warmer
    than it is now.But the bad news is that the climate system is much more sensitive to
    greenhouse gases than previously guessed.
    5 As those gases are expected to continue accumulating in the atmosphere while aerosols
    stabilize or fall,that means"dramatic consequences for estimates of future climate
    change",the scientists agreed in a draft report from the workshop.

    The conclusion reached at the Berlin workshop________.
    A:will influence future climate change
    B:was somewhat surprising
    C:will rise rapidly
    D:was known to us all
    E:was much higher than had been expected
    F:will drop dramatically

    答案:B
    解析:

  • 第13题:

    Text 1 Giant corporations often claim to be"green,"pointing to programs they've undertaken aimed at being environmentally conscious.But sometimes these efforts don't really amount to much.They can be no more than'igrcenwashing,"a public relations effort that doesn't represent any fundamental shift in thinking.But such a change may actually be going on among several of the world's largest fossil fuel companies,namcs such as ExxonMobil,Shell,and BP.One of the biggest reasons:pressure from the companies'sharcholdcrs.Investors arc asking corporations to make more transparent the effects climate change will have on their businesses,as well as explain what they are doing to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.While sharcholdcr motivcs are cerlainly aimed at helping in the worldwide fight against global warming,they also represent a practical need to better understand a company's prospects.If the burning of oil and gas is grcaily curtailed as a result of the December 2015 intemational Paris climate agreement,for example,how might that affect the bottom line of a corporation whose chief source of revenue is extracting and selling carbon-emitting oil and gas?Or,conversely,how is a company planning to take advantage of the business opportunities that emerge from a shift away from fossil fuels?Climate Action 100+,for example,is a shareholder action group that is asking corporations to make stronger commitments to meeting the 80 percent cut in carbon emissions proposed by the Paris agreement signed two years ago by nearly 200 nations.Some 225 investment groups who manage more than S26.3 trillion have signed on in support.Last week,intemational energy giant ExxonMobil said it will step up its reporting to shareholders and the public about the impacts climate change will have on its business,including any expected increased risks.The new policy follows a vote by ExxonMobil investors at the company's annual meeting in May that called for a yearly assessment of the effects of climate change on the company.The new position represents a sea change for ExxonMobil,which until the early 2000s had disputed the need to take action on climate change.Around the world national govemments are shaping new policies in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will not allow global temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius.In the U,S.,individual states and cities are pursuing lawsuits against companies that fail to deal responsibly with greenhouse gas emissions,which they contend harm the public.25.The U.S.is quoted to indicate

    A.its great achievement in dealing with climate change.
    B.greenhouse gas emissions have been under control.
    C.countries are striving to cope with climate change.
    D.it has rules and laws against greenhouse gas emissions

    答案:C
    解析:
    推理判断题。根据定位词定位到文章第七段,一般文中所列举的例子都是为了论证例子上下文提到的论点,由此可知,引用美国的例子是为了论证其上文所提出的论点:各国政府都在制定新政策,努力应对气候变化。故C项为正确选项。【干扰排除】文章最后一段说各国政府都在制定新的政策,努力应对气候变化,并以美国为例,表明各国对应对气候变化所做的努力。文中并没有说在应对气候变化上取得了巨大成就,也未说温室气体排放已得到控制以及有禁止温室气体排放的规定和法律.A、B、D项均属于无中生有,故均排除。

  • 第14题:

    资料:Earlier this month, presidents Barack Obama of the US and Xi Jinping of China made an important symbolic gesture when they committed their countries, the two largest greenhouse gas emitters, to the Paris climate agreement. It was the clearest signal yet to investors worldwide that they need to think about the implications of global warming for their portfolios.
    On Friday afternoon there was an example of what that might mean Mr Obama’s administration issued an order temporarily blocking construction on a section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline. The move was a response to local concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe about potential damage to historic sites and the threats of oil spills. But it is the global issue of climate change that had raised the profile of Dakota Access, making it into a cause celebre for US environmental campaigners. Bill McKibben of 350.org, which played a key role in the successful effort to stop the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, has suggested that Mr Obama could block Dakota Access permanently, on the grounds that it would exacerbate the threat of climate change.
    Last month, the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality issued new guidance for federal agencies, making clear that their decisions should take into account “the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change”, and quantify their consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Dakota Access is intended to carry crude oil 1,172 miles from North Dakota, a centre of the US shale revolution, to Illinois, en route to refineries around America. The case that it would add to global greenhouse gas emission will be harder to make than for Keystone XL, which would have brought crude from the high-emitting oil sands of western Canada, but the campaigners are certain to try.
    If Dakota Access is stopped, it will have a significant impact not just on energy Transfer Partners, the company leading the project, but on all North Dakota oil producers and their customers, who will be forced to use more expensive rail transport.
    Climate change is now an unavoidable business issue. In an excellent paper last week, BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, set out some of the ways that investors can reduce their exposure to the risks and benefit from the opportunities that it creates. The paper is a landmark in the rising awareness of the issue among mainstream investors. It is one thing when a philanthropic fund with assets of a few hundred million takes a stand on climate issues, quite another when the warnings come from a company with about $4.9tn under management. As BlackRock points out, investors’ personal views on climate science are irrelevant. Enough governments and businesses are convinced by the scientific consensus that the threat is real, and are driving regulatory and technological changes that interested in you.
    六If the world is to reduce the risk of catastrophic global warming to acceptable levels, there will have to be a huge reallocation of capital away from fossil fuels and toward low-emission energy sources. That shift has begun, but it needs to go much further. The transition is not straightforward: for as long as oil is the lifeblood of the world’s transport, pipelines will be needed. But when investors and boards make decisions about projects like Dakota Access, they will have to consider their impact on greenhouse gas emissions. The financial consequences of climate change can no longer be ignored.

    According to the article, which one of the following statements is false? ( )

    A.To reduce the risk of global warming, more should be invested on low-emissions energy sources.
    B.Climate change is not only a climate issue, but also a business issue.
    C.It’s more difficult to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions on the Dakota Access than Keystone XL.
    D.US and China will work together to cope with climate change.

    答案:D
    解析:
    本题考查的是细节理解。
    【关键词】following statement;false
    1、【主题句】第六段 If the world is to reduce the risk of catastrophic global warming to acceptable levels, there will have to be a huge reallocation of capital away from fossil fuels and toward low-emission energy sources.如果世界要将发生灾难性全球变暖的风险降至可接受的水平,那么肯定需要将大量投资从化石燃料转向低排放的能源。
    2、第五段Climate change is now an unavoidable business issue.气候变化现在是一个不可避免的商业问题。
    3、第三段Last month, the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality issued new guidance for federal agencies, making clear that their decisions should take into account “the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change”, and quantify their consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. 上月,白宫的环境质量委员会向各联邦政府机构下发新的指南,明确表示,各机构在决策中应考虑“拟议措施对气候变化的潜在影响”,并量化相关措施在温室气体排放方面的影响。The case that it would add to global greenhouse gas emissions will be harder to make than for Keystone XL, which would have brought crude from the high-emitting oil sands of western Canada, but the campaigners are certain to try.与原本计划在加拿大西部地区的油砂矿(温室气体排放强度大)开采石油并输送美国的Keystone XL项目相比,达科他项目会加剧全球温室气体排放的理由显得不那么有力,但环保活动人士肯定要试一试。
    4、第一段presidents Barack Obama of the US and Xi Jinping of China made an important symbolic gesture when they committed their countries, the two largest greenhouse gas emitters,to the Paris climate agreement.美国总统巴拉克?奥巴马(Barack Obama)和中国国家主席习近平摆出了一个重要的象征性姿态,承诺全球最大的两个温室气体排放国将履行《巴黎协定》。
    【解析】本题问“根据文章,哪项描述是错误的?”。选项A意为“为了减少全球变暖的风险,应该投入更多的低排放能源”;选项B意为“气候变化不仅是一个气候问题,也是一个商业问题”;选项C意为“对达科他州的温室气体排放量进行量化比Keystone XL更难以量化”;选项D意为“美国和中国将共同应对气候变化”。
    根据主题句1可知选项A正确,
    根据主题句2可知选项B正确,
    根据主题句3可知选项C正确,
    选项D,根据主题句4可知,中国和美国将履行《巴黎协定》,但这并不意味着两国将合作处理气候变化,文中也没有类似表述。

  • 第15题:

    资料:Earlier this month, presidents Barack Obama of the US and Xi Jinping of China made an important symbolic gesture when they committed their countries, the two largest greenhouse gas emitters, to the Paris climate agreement. It was the clearest signal yet to investors worldwide that they need to think about the implications of global warming for their portfolios.
    On Friday afternoon there was an example of what that might mean Mr Obama’s administration issued an order temporarily blocking construction on a section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline. The move was a response to local concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe about potential damage to historic sites and the threats of oil spills. But it is the global issue of climate change that had raised the profile of Dakota Access, making it into a cause celebre for US environmental campaigners. Bill McKibben of 350.org, which played a key role in the successful effort to stop the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, has suggested that Mr Obama could block Dakota Access permanently, on the grounds that it would exacerbate the threat of climate change.
    Last month, the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality issued new guidance for federal agencies, making clear that their decisions should take into account “the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change”, and quantify their consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Dakota Access is intended to carry crude oil 1,172 miles from North Dakota, a centre of the US shale revolution, to Illinois, en route to refineries around America. The case that it would add to global greenhouse gas emission will be harder to make than for Keystone XL, which would have brought crude from the high-emitting oil sands of western Canada, but the campaigners are certain to try.
    If Dakota Access is stopped, it will have a significant impact not just on energy Transfer Partners, the company leading the project, but on all North Dakota oil producers and their customers, who will be forced to use more expensive rail transport.
    Climate change is now an unavoidable business issue. In an excellent paper last week, BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, set out some of the ways that investors can reduce their exposure to the risks and benefit from the opportunities that it creates. The paper is a landmark in the rising awareness of the issue among mainstream investors. It is one thing when a philanthropic fund with assets of a few hundred million takes a stand on climate issues, quite another when the warnings come from a company with about $4.9tn under management. As BlackRock points out, investors’ personal views on climate science are irrelevant. Enough governments and businesses are convinced by the scientific consensus that the threat is real, and are driving regulatory and technological changes that interested in you.
    六If the world is to reduce the risk of catastrophic global warming to acceptable levels, there will have to be a huge reallocation of capital away from fossil fuels and toward low-emission energy sources. That shift has begun, but it needs to go much further. The transition is not straightforward: for as long as oil is the lifeblood of the world’s transport, pipelines will be needed. But when investors and boards make decisions about projects like Dakota Access, they will have to consider their impact on greenhouse gas emissions. The financial consequences of climate change can no longer be ignored.

    The best title to the article should be ( ).

    A.The catastrophic consequences of climate change.
    B.US efforts in controlling greenhouse gas emissions.
    C.Investment threats in a changing climate.
    D.The world is in danger.

    答案:C
    解析:
    本题考查的是主旨大意。
    【关键词】best title
    【主题句】第一段 It was the clearest signal yet to investors worldwide that they need to think about the implications of global warming for their portfolios.(这是迄今为止向全球投资者发出的最清晰的信号,他们需要考虑全球变暖对其投资组合的影响。)
    最后一段The financial consequences of climate change can no longer be ignored.(气候变化对金融的影响不能再被忽视。)
    【解析】本题问“本文的最佳标题是( )?”。选项A意为“气候变化的灾难性后果”;选项B意为“美国在控制温室气体排放方面的努力”;选项C意为“气候变化中的投资威胁”;选项D意为“世界处于危险之中”。根据主题句可知全篇文章就是在论述气候变化中的投资风险。

  • 第16题:

    共用题干
    Lakes,Too,Feel Global Warming

    There's no doubt;In the last few decades,the average temperature on Earth has been higher than it has
    been in hundreds of years,Around the world,people are starting to measure the effects of global warming一
    and trying to figure out what to do about it.
    Scientists recently used satellites to study the temperatures of lakes around the world,and they found
    that lakes are heating up.Between 1985 and 2009,satellites recorded the nighttime temperatures of the sur-
    faces of 167 lakes.During those 24 years,the lakes got warmer一by an average of about 0.045 degree
    Celsius per year.
    In some places,lakes have been warming by as much as 0.10 degree Celsius per year. At that rate,a
    lake may warm by a full degree Celsius in just 10 years?That difference may seem imull一you might not
    even notice it in your bath.But in a lake,slightly warmer temperatures could mean more algae(水藻),and
    algae can make the lake poisonous(有毒的)to fish.
    The study shows that in some regions,lakes are warming faster than the air around them.This is impor-
    tant because scientists often use measurements of air temperature to study how Earth is warming.By using
    lake temperatures as well,scientists can get a better picture of global warming.The scientists say data on
    lakes give scientists a new way to measure the impact of climate change around the world.
    That’s going to be useful,since no country is too big or too small to ignore climate change.Scientists
    aren't the only ones concerned、 Everyone who lives on Earth is going to be affected by the rapid warming of
    the planet.Many world leaders believe we might be able to do something about it,especially by reducing the
    amount of greenhouse(温室)gases we put into the air.
    That’s why the United Nations started the F'ramework Convention on Climate Change,or UNFCCC.
    Every year the convention meets,and representatives from countries around the world gather to talk about
    climate change and discuss global solutions to the challenges of a warming world.

    Scientists generally focus on air temperatures when studying global warming.
    A:Right
    B:Wrong
    C:Not mentioned

    答案:A
    解析:
    由第二段可知,科学家从1985年开始记录湖水温度的:到现在还不到30年。
    由第二段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    湖水在亚洲温暖的快在文中没有信息依据。
    由第三段最后一句话可知,此判断正确。
    由第四段第二句话可知,科学家经常用空气温度来研究地球变暖的问题,说明他们关 注的主要焦点在于空气温度。
    由第五段的内容可知,地球上的任何人都应关心全球变暖的问题。
    在文中没有提及今年的UNFCCC在哪举行。第3部分:概括大意与完成句子

  • 第17题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    A Sunshade(遮阳伞)for the Planet

    Even with the best will in the world,reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming. It has become clear that even if we take the most strong measures to control emissions, the uncertainties in our climate models still leave open the possibility of extreme warming and rises in sea level. At the same time,resistance by governments and special interest groups makes it quite possible that the actions suggested by climate scientists might not be implemented soon enough.
    Fortunately,if the worst comes to the worst,scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves. For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem. Until now,that is a growing number of researchers are taking a fresh look at large-scale"geoengineering"projects that might be used to counteract global warming."I use the analogy of methadone,"says Stephen Schneider,a climate researcher at Stanford University in California who was among the first to draw attention to global warming."If you have a heroin addict,the correct treatment is hospitalization,and a long rehab. But if they absolutely refuse,methadone is better than heroin."
    Basically the idea is to apply"sunscreen"to the whole planet. One astronomer has come up with a radical plan to cool Earth:launch trillions of feather-light discs into space,where they would form a vast cloud that would block the sun's rays.It's controversial,but recent studies suggest there are ways to deflect just enough of the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface to counteract the warming produced by the greenhouse effect. Global climate models show that blocking just 1.8 percent of the incident energy in the sun's rays would cancel out the warming effects produced by a doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.That could be crucial,because even the most severe emissions control measures being proposed would leave us with a doubling of carbon dioxide by the end of this century,and that would last for at least a century more.

    Scientists resist talking about their options because they don't want people to______.
    A:know what they are doing
    B:feel their efforts are useless
    C:think the problem has been solved
    D:see the real problem

    答案:C
    解析:
    题干意思为:通过前两段,作者认为……第一段第一句:Even with the best will in the world , reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming.即使怀着世间最美好的愿望,减少碳排放也不会阻止全球变暖。第二段第一句:Fortunately , if the worst comes to the worst , scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves.幸运的是,如果情况越来越糟,科学家们还有一些应对措施。通过这两句可以明显地看出,作者对限制排放是持反对态度的,认为限排不能解决问题,所以选择B项。
    题干意思为:科学家们反对人们对他们的选择进行讨论,因为他们不想让人们知道……第二段第二句:For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem.他们反对人们讨论这些选择的主要原因是担心引起自满情绪,从而使得从根本上解决问题的努力受挫。经过分析,只有C选项正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider提到毒瘾和美沙酮疗法的用意何在?第二段最后一句:If you have a heroin addict , the correct treatment is hospitalization , and a long rehab.But if they absolutely refuse , methadone is better than heroin.如果你有毒瘾,那么最好的方法是住院治疗,进行长时间恢复,但是如果都不管用的话,美沙酮总比海洛因强。显然他是要说明 Methadone is an effective way to treat a hard heroin addict(美沙酮对毒瘾很深的人是有治疗效果的)。因此选项A正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider阻止全球变暖的方法是什么? 文中最后一段第一句:Basically the idea is to apply " sunscreen" to the whole planet.这种方法基本上是要为整个地球涂上一层“遮光剂”。经过分析,选项C正确。
    题干意思为:根据最后一段,对于遮光剂的有效性的表述,哪一句是错误的?D选项It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere(减少大气层温室气体排放)正好与该方法冲突,所以该项不正确。

  • 第18题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    A Sunshade(遮阳伞)for the Planet

    Even with the best will in the world,reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming. It has become clear that even if we take the most strong measures to control emissions, the uncertainties in our climate models still leave open the possibility of extreme warming and rises in sea level. At the same time,resistance by governments and special interest groups makes it quite possible that the actions suggested by climate scientists might not be implemented soon enough.
    Fortunately,if the worst comes to the worst,scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves. For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem. Until now,that is a growing number of researchers are taking a fresh look at large-scale"geoengineering"projects that might be used to counteract global warming."I use the analogy of methadone,"says Stephen Schneider,a climate researcher at Stanford University in California who was among the first to draw attention to global warming."If you have a heroin addict,the correct treatment is hospitalization,and a long rehab. But if they absolutely refuse,methadone is better than heroin."
    Basically the idea is to apply"sunscreen"to the whole planet. One astronomer has come up with a radical plan to cool Earth:launch trillions of feather-light discs into space,where they would form a vast cloud that would block the sun's rays.It's controversial,but recent studies suggest there are ways to deflect just enough of the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface to counteract the warming produced by the greenhouse effect. Global climate models show that blocking just 1.8 percent of the incident energy in the sun's rays would cancel out the warming effects produced by a doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.That could be crucial,because even the most severe emissions control measures being proposed would leave us with a doubling of carbon dioxide by the end of this century,and that would last for at least a century more.

    What does Stephen Schneider say about a heroin addict and methadone?
    A:Methadone is an effective way to treat a hard heroin addict.
    B:Methadone is not a correct way to treat a heroin addict.
    C:Hospitalization together with methadone can work effectively with a heroin addict.
    D:Methadone and heroin are equally effective in treating a heroin addict.

    答案:A
    解析:
    题干意思为:通过前两段,作者认为……第一段第一句:Even with the best will in the world , reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming.即使怀着世间最美好的愿望,减少碳排放也不会阻止全球变暖。第二段第一句:Fortunately , if the worst comes to the worst , scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves.幸运的是,如果情况越来越糟,科学家们还有一些应对措施。通过这两句可以明显地看出,作者对限制排放是持反对态度的,认为限排不能解决问题,所以选择B项。
    题干意思为:科学家们反对人们对他们的选择进行讨论,因为他们不想让人们知道……第二段第二句:For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem.他们反对人们讨论这些选择的主要原因是担心引起自满情绪,从而使得从根本上解决问题的努力受挫。经过分析,只有C选项正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider提到毒瘾和美沙酮疗法的用意何在?第二段最后一句:If you have a heroin addict , the correct treatment is hospitalization , and a long rehab.But if they absolutely refuse , methadone is better than heroin.如果你有毒瘾,那么最好的方法是住院治疗,进行长时间恢复,但是如果都不管用的话,美沙酮总比海洛因强。显然他是要说明 Methadone is an effective way to treat a hard heroin addict(美沙酮对毒瘾很深的人是有治疗效果的)。因此选项A正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider阻止全球变暖的方法是什么? 文中最后一段第一句:Basically the idea is to apply " sunscreen" to the whole planet.这种方法基本上是要为整个地球涂上一层“遮光剂”。经过分析,选项C正确。
    题干意思为:根据最后一段,对于遮光剂的有效性的表述,哪一句是错误的?D选项It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere(减少大气层温室气体排放)正好与该方法冲突,所以该项不正确。

  • 第19题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    A Sunshade(遮阳伞)for the Planet

    Even with the best will in the world,reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming. It has become clear that even if we take the most strong measures to control emissions, the uncertainties in our climate models still leave open the possibility of extreme warming and rises in sea level. At the same time,resistance by governments and special interest groups makes it quite possible that the actions suggested by climate scientists might not be implemented soon enough.
    Fortunately,if the worst comes to the worst,scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves. For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem. Until now,that is a growing number of researchers are taking a fresh look at large-scale"geoengineering"projects that might be used to counteract global warming."I use the analogy of methadone,"says Stephen Schneider,a climate researcher at Stanford University in California who was among the first to draw attention to global warming."If you have a heroin addict,the correct treatment is hospitalization,and a long rehab. But if they absolutely refuse,methadone is better than heroin."
    Basically the idea is to apply"sunscreen"to the whole planet. One astronomer has come up with a radical plan to cool Earth:launch trillions of feather-light discs into space,where they would form a vast cloud that would block the sun's rays.It's controversial,but recent studies suggest there are ways to deflect just enough of the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface to counteract the warming produced by the greenhouse effect. Global climate models show that blocking just 1.8 percent of the incident energy in the sun's rays would cancel out the warming effects produced by a doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.That could be crucial,because even the most severe emissions control measures being proposed would leave us with a doubling of carbon dioxide by the end of this century,and that would last for at least a century more.

    According to the first two paragraphs,the author thinks that______.
    A:strong measures have been taken by the government to prevent global warming
    B:It is impossible to prevent global warming by reducing carbon emissions
    C:despite the difficulty,scientists have some options to prevent global warming
    D:actions suggested by scientists will never be realized

    答案:B
    解析:
    题干意思为:通过前两段,作者认为……第一段第一句:Even with the best will in the world , reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming.即使怀着世间最美好的愿望,减少碳排放也不会阻止全球变暖。第二段第一句:Fortunately , if the worst comes to the worst , scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves.幸运的是,如果情况越来越糟,科学家们还有一些应对措施。通过这两句可以明显地看出,作者对限制排放是持反对态度的,认为限排不能解决问题,所以选择B项。
    题干意思为:科学家们反对人们对他们的选择进行讨论,因为他们不想让人们知道……第二段第二句:For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem.他们反对人们讨论这些选择的主要原因是担心引起自满情绪,从而使得从根本上解决问题的努力受挫。经过分析,只有C选项正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider提到毒瘾和美沙酮疗法的用意何在?第二段最后一句:If you have a heroin addict , the correct treatment is hospitalization , and a long rehab.But if they absolutely refuse , methadone is better than heroin.如果你有毒瘾,那么最好的方法是住院治疗,进行长时间恢复,但是如果都不管用的话,美沙酮总比海洛因强。显然他是要说明 Methadone is an effective way to treat a hard heroin addict(美沙酮对毒瘾很深的人是有治疗效果的)。因此选项A正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider阻止全球变暖的方法是什么? 文中最后一段第一句:Basically the idea is to apply " sunscreen" to the whole planet.这种方法基本上是要为整个地球涂上一层“遮光剂”。经过分析,选项C正确。
    题干意思为:根据最后一段,对于遮光剂的有效性的表述,哪一句是错误的?D选项It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere(减少大气层温室气体排放)正好与该方法冲突,所以该项不正确。

  • 第20题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    A Sunshade(遮阳伞)for the Planet

    Even with the best will in the world,reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming. It has become clear that even if we take the most strong measures to control emissions, the uncertainties in our climate models still leave open the possibility of extreme warming and rises in sea level. At the same time,resistance by governments and special interest groups makes it quite possible that the actions suggested by climate scientists might not be implemented soon enough.
    Fortunately,if the worst comes to the worst,scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves. For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem. Until now,that is a growing number of researchers are taking a fresh look at large-scale"geoengineering"projects that might be used to counteract global warming."I use the analogy of methadone,"says Stephen Schneider,a climate researcher at Stanford University in California who was among the first to draw attention to global warming."If you have a heroin addict,the correct treatment is hospitalization,and a long rehab. But if they absolutely refuse,methadone is better than heroin."
    Basically the idea is to apply"sunscreen"to the whole planet. One astronomer has come up with a radical plan to cool Earth:launch trillions of feather-light discs into space,where they would form a vast cloud that would block the sun's rays.It's controversial,but recent studies suggest there are ways to deflect just enough of the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface to counteract the warming produced by the greenhouse effect. Global climate models show that blocking just 1.8 percent of the incident energy in the sun's rays would cancel out the warming effects produced by a doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.That could be crucial,because even the most severe emissions control measures being proposed would leave us with a doubling of carbon dioxide by the end of this century,and that would last for at least a century more.

    What is NOT true of the effectiveness of"sunscreen",according to the last paragraph?
    A:It deflects sunlight reaching the Earth to counteract the warming.
    B:It blocks the incident energy in the sun's rays.
    C:It is a controversial method.
    D:It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

    答案:D
    解析:
    题干意思为:通过前两段,作者认为……第一段第一句:Even with the best will in the world , reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming.即使怀着世间最美好的愿望,减少碳排放也不会阻止全球变暖。第二段第一句:Fortunately , if the worst comes to the worst , scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves.幸运的是,如果情况越来越糟,科学家们还有一些应对措施。通过这两句可以明显地看出,作者对限制排放是持反对态度的,认为限排不能解决问题,所以选择B项。
    题干意思为:科学家们反对人们对他们的选择进行讨论,因为他们不想让人们知道……第二段第二句:For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem.他们反对人们讨论这些选择的主要原因是担心引起自满情绪,从而使得从根本上解决问题的努力受挫。经过分析,只有C选项正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider提到毒瘾和美沙酮疗法的用意何在?第二段最后一句:If you have a heroin addict , the correct treatment is hospitalization , and a long rehab.But if they absolutely refuse , methadone is better than heroin.如果你有毒瘾,那么最好的方法是住院治疗,进行长时间恢复,但是如果都不管用的话,美沙酮总比海洛因强。显然他是要说明 Methadone is an effective way to treat a hard heroin addict(美沙酮对毒瘾很深的人是有治疗效果的)。因此选项A正确。
    题干意思为:Stephen Schneider阻止全球变暖的方法是什么? 文中最后一段第一句:Basically the idea is to apply " sunscreen" to the whole planet.这种方法基本上是要为整个地球涂上一层“遮光剂”。经过分析,选项C正确。
    题干意思为:根据最后一段,对于遮光剂的有效性的表述,哪一句是错误的?D选项It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere(减少大气层温室气体排放)正好与该方法冲突,所以该项不正确。

  • 第21题:

    共用题干
    Global Warming

    1 Smoke is clouding our view of global warming,protecting the planet from perhaps
    three-quarters of the greenhouse(温室)effect.That might sound like good news, but
    experts say that as the cover diminishes in coming decades,we are facing a dramatic
    increase of warming that could be two or even three times as great as official best
    guesses.
    2 This was the dramatic conclusion reached last week at a workshop in Dahlem,Berlin,
    where top atmospheric scientists got together,including Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen
    and Swedish scientist Bert Bolin,former chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on
    Climate Change(IPCC).
    3 IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols(浮质)of smoke and other
    particles from burning rainforest,crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and
    counteracting the warming effect of carbon dioxide(二氧化物)emissions.Until now,they
    reckoned that aerosols reduced greenhouse warming by perhaps a quarter,cutting
    increases by 0.2℃.So the 0.6℃of warming over the past century would have been 0.8℃
    without aerosols.
    4 But the Berlin workshop concluded that the real figure is even higher一aerosols may have
    reduced global warming by as much as three-quarters,cutting increases by 1.8℃.If so,
    the good news is that aerosols have prevented the world getting almost two degrees warmer
    than it is now.But the bad news is that the climate system is much more sensitive to
    greenhouse gases than previously guessed.
    5 As those gases are expected to continue accumulating in the atmosphere while aerosols
    stabilize or fall,that means"dramatic consequences for estimates of future climate
    change",the scientists agreed in a draft report from the workshop.

    Paragraph 5________
    A:Atmospheric Scientists
    B:The Calculations Made at the Berlin Workshop
    C:The Previous Calculations of the Effect of Aerosols
    D:The Scientists' Agreement
    E:The Authoritative Conclusion
    F:Greenhouse Gases

    答案:D
    解析:

  • 第22题:

    共用题干
    Global Warming

    1.Smoke is clouding our view of global warming,protecting the planet from perhaps threequarters of the greenhouse(温室)effect. That might sound like good news,but experts say that as the cover diminishes in coming decades,we are facing a dramatic increase of warming that could be two or even three times as great as official best guesses.
    2.This was the dramatic conclusion reached last week at a workshop in Dahlem,Berlin,where top atmospheric scientists got together,including Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen and Swedish scientist Bert Bolin,former chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC).
    3. IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols(浮质)of smoke and other partidles from burning rainforest,crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and counteracting the warming effect of carbon dioxide(二氧化物)emissions. Until now,they reckoned that aerosols reduced greenhouse warming by perhaps a quarter,cutting increases by 0.2℃.So the 0.6℃of warming over the past century would have been 0.8℃without aerosols.
    4.But the Berlin workshop concluded that the real figure is even higher—aerosols may have reduced global warming by as much as three-quarters,cutting increases by 1.8℃.If so,the good news is that aerosols have prevented the world getting almost two degrees warmer than it is now. But the bad news is that the climate system is much more sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously guessed.
    5.As those gases are expected to continue accumulating in the atmosphere while aerosols stabilize or fall,that means"dramatic consequences for estimates of future climate change",the scientists agreed in a draft report from the workshop.

    The increase of greenhouse gases_______.
    A: will influence future climate change
    B:was somewhat surprising
    C:will rise rapidly
    D:was known to US all
    E:was much higher than had been expected
    F:will drop dramatically

    答案:A
    解析:
    文章第二段指出,结论是由杰出的大气科学家得出的。“杰出的科学家” 即权威科学家。
    文章第三段提到了对浮质所产生的影响进行的计算,这个计算先于第四段所提及的计算,因而,被称为“先前的”计算。
    柏林研讨会得出的结论是:真正的数字比这还要高——浮质可能已经把全球气候变暖的程度减少了四分之三。因此,本段讲的是柏林研讨会的佑算。
    第五段讲的是科学家们关于浮质对气候变化影响的一致性的看法。
    见文章第一段。
    本题翻译:“柏林讨论会的结论有点令人吃惊”。因为这个结论认为:“浮质可能已经把全球气候变暖的程度减少了四分之三。”
    文章第四段指出:然而,柏林研讨会得出的结论是,真正的数字比这还要高,“比这还要高”是说比第三段推测的数字要高,也就比人们预期的要高。
    文章的最后一段提到了这个问题:温室气体在大气里不断聚积对未来气候变化的预测产生惊人的后果。

  • 第23题:

    共用题干
    Global Warming

    1.Smoke is clouding our view of global warming,protecting the planet from perhaps threequarters of the greenhouse(温室)effect. That might sound like good news,but experts say that as the cover diminishes in coming decades,we are facing a dramatic increase of warming that could be two or even three times as great as official best guesses.
    2.This was the dramatic conclusion reached last week at a workshop in Dahlem,Berlin,where top atmospheric scientists got together,including Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen and Swedish scientist Bert Bolin,former chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC).
    3. IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols(浮质)of smoke and other partidles from burning rainforest,crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and counteracting the warming effect of carbon dioxide(二氧化物)emissions. Until now,they reckoned that aerosols reduced greenhouse warming by perhaps a quarter,cutting increases by 0.2℃.So the 0.6℃of warming over the past century would have been 0.8℃without aerosols.
    4.But the Berlin workshop concluded that the real figure is even higher—aerosols may have reduced global warming by as much as three-quarters,cutting increases by 1.8℃.If so,the good news is that aerosols have prevented the world getting almost two degrees warmer than it is now. But the bad news is that the climate system is much more sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously guessed.
    5.As those gases are expected to continue accumulating in the atmosphere while aerosols stabilize or fall,that means"dramatic consequences for estimates of future climate change",the scientists agreed in a draft report from the workshop.

    When the cover diminishes in the coming decades,temperature_______.
    A: will influence future climate change
    B:was somewhat surprising
    C:will rise rapidly
    D:was known to US all
    E:was much higher than had been expected
    F:will drop dramatically

    答案:C
    解析:
    文章第二段指出,结论是由杰出的大气科学家得出的。“杰出的科学家” 即权威科学家。
    文章第三段提到了对浮质所产生的影响进行的计算,这个计算先于第四段所提及的计算,因而,被称为“先前的”计算。
    柏林研讨会得出的结论是:真正的数字比这还要高——浮质可能已经把全球气候变暖的程度减少了四分之三。因此,本段讲的是柏林研讨会的佑算。
    第五段讲的是科学家们关于浮质对气候变化影响的一致性的看法。
    见文章第一段。
    本题翻译:“柏林讨论会的结论有点令人吃惊”。因为这个结论认为:“浮质可能已经把全球气候变暖的程度减少了四分之三。”
    文章第四段指出:然而,柏林研讨会得出的结论是,真正的数字比这还要高,“比这还要高”是说比第三段推测的数字要高,也就比人们预期的要高。
    文章的最后一段提到了这个问题:温室气体在大气里不断聚积对未来气候变化的预测产生惊人的后果。

  • 第24题:

    问答题
    Even the most uninformed student of climate change could tell you that the solution to global warming is to alleviate global greenhouse gas emissions, and fast. But the problem is that the sheer amount of greenhouse gases we’ve already pumped into the atmosphere has irreversibly bound us to a certain amount of warming over the next several decades. No matter what we do, we’ll have to adapt to it.  (1)_______________. Already precipitation patterns seem to be changing, making some drier areas—like the arid American southwest —even drier, and rainy regions even wetter. As warmer temperatures creep northward, so do insects and other pests that are adapted to the heat. The results can be distressing. The tiny mountain pine beetle, which infests pine trees in the Rocky Mountain region, used to be controlled by freezing winters. But as temperatures have warmed over the past decade, the mountain pine beetle’s territory has spread, destroying millions of acres of Canadian pines.  (2)_______________Generations of American conservationists have fought to preserve wild- life and to keep nature pristine in the face of a growing population and pollution. To a remarkable extent, they’ve succeeded—almost 16% of the entire landmass of the U.S. is protected, and the Endangered Species Acthas helped save countless animals from extinction.  (3)_______________. What good is a wildlife reserve if the protected animals can’t live there, because climate change pushes them out? What difference does it make to defend trees from logging, if global warming will allow a new pest to destroy whole forests?  (4)_______________. Last week the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy brought together conservation leaders from around the U.S. to discuss how to cope with warming, trying to work out a new framework for the biggest challenge facing conservation.  (5)_______________. So too is the scale required to properly adapt to climate change, which will almost certainly continue for decades into the future. “Climate change will affect agriculture, water resources, forestry, transportation, waste management, energy generation, national security, immigration patterns, fisheries, food security, you name it,” said Lara Hansen. “We need to change the way we allocate resources, plan economies and protect livelihoods.”  That means that the way we’ve been carrying out conservation—picking the right land spaces and playing goalie—won’t work anymore, as climate change keeps moving the target. Regardless of what we do, the changes will be coming fast. We need to begin cutting our carbon immediately, but we need to adapt now as well. The world is changing because of us; to save what’s left, we’ll have to change too.  [A] But global warming threatens to change all that, by altering the very foundation on which the conservation movement was built.  [B] Global warming was already having “profound effects” in the American West, and that the future would bring increased drought, heat waves, rainstorms, extinctions and more.  [C] That means climate change isn’t a problem for tomorrow; the effects are happening now.  [D] The conference was fruitful, if a bit depressing. What’s clear is that the sheer speed of the changes already taking place due to warming—like the mountain pine beetle infestation—are catching us off guard.  [E] Conservationists will have to work even harder, trying to minimize non climate-related threats to land and species.  [F] The pine beetle infestation is just one example of global warming’s present danger. It also represents the unique challenges that warming will pose for land conservation managers on the front lines of the battle against it.  [G] The answer is to adapt the way we practice wildlife and land conservation to climate change. There’s a term for this—adaptive management.(此文选自Time2008年刊)

    正确答案:
    1. C 本文首段提出全球气候变暖已是事实,我们在今后不得不面对而且还必须适应此问题。空格后接着用Already一词引出当下气候的变化,并以山松甲虫为例对目前气候变化的影响进行了具体说明。C指出气候变化不仅会对未来产生影响,而且对当今世界也发生着影响,承上启下,因此C是正确答案。对此空干扰较大的是B 选项,B主要讲气候变暖已对美国西部产生了深刻影响,且在将来会引发更多的不良现象。而下文主要讲目前状况,所以排除此选项。
    2. F 上段已详细讲述了山松甲虫的的事例。空格下文对土地保护管理者一直以来的努力进行了说明。F中的The pine beetle … danger.是续讲上文山松甲虫的事例,同时指出气候变暖对土地保护管理者来说是独特挑战,符合文章逻辑,故F为正确答案。
    3. A 上文介绍了自然资源保护管理人员所做的努力和取得的成效,A中的but语锋一转,指出虽然conservationists取得了很大成功,但是随着全球气候不断变暖,他们的所有努力都可能白费,开始持怀疑态度。作者在空格后提出的一系列问题 “What good… forests?”更进一步表明了自己的疑虑。 A表示转折意义符合上下文语境。此处E选项干扰较大,E项讲“资源保护者… …力图降低与气候无关的对土地和物种的威胁。”文中讲气候变暖对conservationists提出的巨大挑战,但未提及non climate-related threats,且与下文诸多问题缺少联系,不合文意,故排除。
    4. G 上文中作者提到气候变暖所产生的影响,并提出一系列问题。G中的The answer is…正是回答上文的问题,故为正确答案。
    5. D 上文段末提到资源保护领导人召开了会议,D中的“The conference....”承接上文,同时也提到了气候变暖的速度,又很好地引出下文 “So too is the scale…”,及后文气候变化对人们生活个方面的影响。故D符合语境。
    解析: 暂无解析