更多“(b) Explain in the context of Flavours Fine Foods, what is meant by:(i) responsibility; (4 marks)”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    (b) Explain the advantages and the disadvantages of:

    (i) the face to face interview between two people; (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) The face to face interview is the most common form. of interview. In this situation the candidate is interviewed by a single representative of the employing organisation.
    The advantages of such interviews are that they establish an understanding between the participants, are cost effective for the organisation (only one member of the organisation’s staff is involved) and, because of the more personal nature, ensure that candidates feel comfortable.
    The disadvantages are that the selection interview relies on the views and impression of a single interviewer that can be both subjective and biased. In addition, the interviewer may be selective in questioning and it is easier for the candidate to hide weaknesses or lack of ability.

  • 第2题:

    (d) Explain to the management of Bailey’s why consideration should be given to resolving the problems through:

    (i) job rotation; (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    (d) (i) Job rotation is the planned rotation of staff between jobs and tasks to reduce monotony and boredom and provide fresh opportunities and challenges. This could be a useful way of encouraging employees at Bailey’s alongside enrichment and enlargement. Rotation would encourage better understanding between employees at Bailey’s. It takes two forms,the transfer to another job after some time in an existing job and the introduction of another individual to the job being vacated, or as a form. of training where individuals are moved through different jobs to learn new skills.

  • 第3题:

    (b) The CEO of Oceania National Airways (ONA) has already strongly rejected the re-positioning of ONA as a ‘no

    frills’ low-cost budget airline.

    (i) Explain the key features of a ‘no frills’ low-cost strategy. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) A ‘no frills’ strategy combines low price with low perceived benefits of the product or service. It is primarily associated
    with commodity goods and services where customers do not discern or value differences in the products or services
    offered by competing suppliers. In some circumstances the customer cannot afford the better quality product or service
    of a particular supplier. ‘No frills’ strategies are particularly attractive in price-sensitive markets. Within the airline sector,
    the term ‘no frills’ is associated with a low cost pricing strategy. In Europe, at the time of writing, easyJet and Ryanair
    are the two dominant ‘no frills’ low-cost budget airlines. In Asia, AirAsia and Tiger Airways are examples of ‘no frills’ lowcost
    budget carriers. ‘No frills’ strategies usually exist in markets where buyers have high power coupled with low
    switching costs and so there is little brand loyalty. It is also prevalent in markets where there are few providers with
    similar market shares. As a result of this the cost structure of each provider is similar and new product and service
    initiatives are quickly copied. Finally a ‘no frills’ strategy might be pursued by a company entering the market, using thisas a strategy to gain market share before progressing to alternative strategies.

  • 第4题:

    (b) Explain the meaning of Stephanie’s comment: ‘I would like to get risk awareness embedded in the culture

    at the Southland factory.’ (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    Embedded risk
    Risk awareness is the knowledge of the nature, hazards and probabilities of risk in given situations. Whilst management will
    typically be more aware than others in the organisation of many risks, it is important to embed awareness at all levels so as
    to reduce the costs of risk to an organisation and its members (which might be measured in financial or non-financial terms).
    In practical terms, embedding means introducing a taken-for-grantedness of risk awareness into the culture of an organisation
    and its internal systems. Culture, defined in Handy’s terms as ‘the way we do things round here’ underpins all risk
    management activity as it defines attitudes, actions and beliefs.
    The embedding of risk awareness into culture and systems involves introducing risk controls into the process of work and the
    environment in which it takes place. Risk awareness and risk mitigation become as much a part of a process as the process
    itself so that people assume such measures to be non-negotiable components of their work experience. In such organisational
    cultures, risk management is unquestioned, taken for granted, built into the corporate mission and culture and may be used
    as part of the reward system.
    Tutorial note: other meaningful definitions of culture in an organisational context are equally acceptable.

  • 第5题:

    (ii) Explain the ethical tensions between these roles that Anne is now experiencing. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Tensions in roles
    On one hand, Anne needs to cultivate and manage her relationship with her manager (Zachary) who seems convinced
    that Van Buren, and Frank in particular, are incapable of bad practice. He shows evidence of poor judgment and
    compromised independence. Anne must decide how to deal with Zachary’s poor judgment.
    On the other hand, Anne has a duty to both the public interest and the shareholders of Van Buren to ensure that the
    accounts do contain a ‘true and fair view’. Under a materiality test, she may ultimately decide that the payment in
    question need not hold up the audit signoff but the poor client explanation (from Frank) is also a matter of concern to
    Anne as a professional accountant.

  • 第6题:

    (d) Explain the term ‘environmental management accounting’ and the benefits that may accrue to organisations

    which adopt it. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (d) Environmental management accounting (EMA) involves the generation and analysis of both financial and non-financial
    information in order to support internal environmental management processes. It is complementary to the conventional
    management accounting approach, with the aim to develop appropriate mechanisms that assist the management of
    organisations in the identification and allocation of environmentally related costs.
    Organisations that alter their management accounting practices to incorporate environmental concerns will have greater
    awareness of the impact of environment-related activities on their profit and loss accounts and balance sheets. This is because
    conventional management accounting systems tend to attribute many environmental costs to general overhead accounts with
    the result that they are ‘hidden’ from management. It follows that organisations which adopt EMA are more likely to identify
    and take advantage of cost reduction and other improvement opportunities. A concern with environmental costs will also
    reduce the chances of employing incorrect pricing of products and services and taking the wrong options in terms of mix and
    development decisions. This in turn may lead to enhanced customer value whilst reducing the risk profile attaching to
    investments and other decisions which have long term consequences.
    Reputational risk will also be reduced as a consequence of adopting (EMA) since management will be seen to be acting in
    an environmentally responsible manner. Organisations can learn from the Shell Oil Company whose experience in the much
    publicised Brent Spar incident cost the firm millions in terms of lost revenues as a result of a consumer boycott.

  • 第7题:

    (c) (i) Explain the capital gains tax (CGT) implications of a takeover where the consideration is in the form. of

    shares (a ‘paper for paper’ transaction) stating any conditions that need to be satisfied. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) (i) Paper for paper rules
    The proposed transaction broadly falls under the ‘paper for paper’ rules. Where this is the case, chargeable gains do not
    arise. Instead, the new holding stands in the shoes (and inherits the base cost) of the original holding.
    The company issuing the new shares must:
    (i) end up with more than 25% of the ordinary share capital (or a majority of the voting power) of the old company,
    OR
    (ii) make a general offer to shareholders in the other company with a condition that, if satisfied, would give the
    acquiring company control of the other company.
    The exchange must be for bona fide commercial reasons and must not have as its main purpose (or one of its main
    purposes) the avoidance of CGT or corporation tax. The acquiring company can obtain advance clearance from the
    Inland Revenue that the conditions will be met.
    If part of the offer consideration is in the form. of cash, a gain must be calculated using the part disposal rules. If the
    cash received is not more than the higher of £3,000 or 5% of the total value on takeover, then the amount received in
    cash can be deducted from the base cost of the securities under the small distribution rules.

  • 第8题:

    In relation to company law, explain:

    (a) the limitations on the use of company names; (4 marks)

    (b) the tort of ‘passing off’; (4 marks)

    (c) the role of the company names adjudicators under the Companies Act 2006. (2 marks)


    正确答案:

    (a) Except in relation to specifically exempted companies, such as those involved in charitable work, companies are required to indicate that they are operating on the basis of limited liability. Thus private companies are required to end their names, either with the word ‘limited’ or the abbreviation ‘ltd’, and public companies must end their names with the words ‘public limited company’ or the abbreviation ‘plc’. Welsh companies may use the Welsh language equivalents (Companies Act (CA)2006 ss.58, 59 & 60).
    Companies Registry maintains a register of business names, and will refuse to register any company with a name that is the same as one already on that index (CA 2006 s.66).
    Certain categories of names are, subject to the decision of the Secretary of State, unacceptable per se, as follows:
    (i) names which in the opinion of the Secretary of State constitute a criminal offence or are offensive (CA 2006 s.53)
    (ii) names which are likely to give the impression that the company is connected with either government or local government authorities (s.54).
    (iii) names which include a word or expression specified under the Company and Business Names Regulations 1981 (s.26(2)(b)). This category requires the express approval of the Secretary of State for the use of any of the names or expressions contained on the list, and relates to areas which raise a matter of public concern in relation to their use.
    Under s.67 of the Companies Act 2006 the Secretary of State has power to require a company to alter its name under the following circumstances:
    (i) where it is the same as a name already on the Registrar’s index of company names.
    (ii) where it is ‘too like’ a name that is on that index.
    The name of a company can always be changed by a special resolution of the company so long as it continues to comply with the above requirements (s.77).

    (b) The tort of passing off was developed to prevent one person from using any name which is likely to divert business their way by suggesting that the business is actually that of some other person or is connected in any way with that other business. It thus enables people to protect the goodwill they have built up in relation to their business activity. In Ewing v Buttercup
    Margarine Co Ltd (1917) the plaintiff successfully prevented the defendants from using a name that suggested a link with
    his existing dairy company. It cannot be used, however, if there is no likelihood of the public being confused, where for example the companies are conducting different businesses (Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Dunlop Motor Co Ltd (1907)
    and Stringfellow v McCain Foods GB Ltd (1984). Nor can it be used where the name consists of a word in general use (Aerators Ltd v Tollitt (1902)).
    Part 41 of the Companies Act (CA) 2006, which repeals and replaces the Business Names Act 1985, still does not prevent one business from using the same, or a very similar, name as another business so the tort of passing off will still have an application in the wider business sector. However the Act introduced a new procedure to deal specifically with company names. As previously under the CA 1985, a company cannot register with a name that was the same as any already registered (s.665 Companies Act (CA) 2006) and under CA s.67 the Secretary of State may direct a company to change its name if it has been registered in a name that is the same as, or too like a name appearing on the registrar’s index of company names. In addition, however, a completely new system of complaint has been introduced.

    (c) Under ss.69–74 of CA 2006 a new procedure has been introduced to cover situations where a company has been registered with a name
    (i) that it is the same as a name associated with the applicant in which he has goodwill, or
    (ii) that it is sufficiently similar to such a name that its use in the United Kingdom would be likely to mislead by suggesting a connection between the company and the applicant (s.69).
    Section 69 can be used not just by other companies but by any person to object to a company names adjudicator if a company’s name is similar to a name in which the applicant has goodwill. There is list of circumstances raising a presumption that a name was adopted legitimately, however even then, if the objector can show that the name was registered either, to obtain money from them, or to prevent them from using the name, then they will be entitled to an order to require the company to change its name.
    Under s.70 the Secretary of State is given the power to appoint company names adjudicators and their staff and to finance their activities, with one person being appointed Chief Adjudicator.
    Section 71 provides the Secretary of State with power to make rules for the proceedings before a company names adjudicator.
    Section 72 provides that the decision of an adjudicator and the reasons for it, are to be published within 90 days of the decision.
    Section 73 provides that if an objection is upheld, then the adjudicator is to direct the company with the offending name to change its name to one that does not similarly offend. A deadline must be set for the change. If the offending name is not changed, then the adjudicator will decide a new name for the company.
    Under s.74 either party may appeal to a court against the decision of the company names adjudicator. The court can either uphold or reverse the adjudicator’s decision, and may make any order that the adjudicator might have made.

  • 第9题:

    (b) Explain what effect the acquisition of Di Rollo Co will have on the planning of your audit of the consolidated

    financial statements of Murray Co for the year ending 31 March 2008. (10 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Effect of acquisition on planning the audit of Murray’s consolidated financial statements for the year ending 31 March
    2008
    Group structure
    The new group structure must be ascertained to identify all entities that should be consolidated into the Murray group’s
    financial statements for the year ending 31 March 2008.
    Materiality assessment
    Preliminary materiality for the group will be much higher, in monetary terms, than in the prior year. For example, if a % of
    total assets is a determinant of the preliminary materiality, it may be increased by 10% (as the fair value of assets acquired,
    including goodwill, is $2,373,000 compared with $21·5m in Murray’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended
    31 March 2007).
    The materiality of each subsidiary should be re-assessed, in terms of the enlarged group as at the planning stage. For
    example, any subsidiary that was just material for the year ended 31 March 2007 may no longer be material to the group.
    This assessment will identify, for example:
    – those entities requiring an audit visit; and
    – those entities for which substantive analytical procedures may suffice.
    As Di Rollo’s assets are material to the group Ross should plan to inspect the South American operations. The visit may
    include a meeting with Di Rollo’s previous auditors to discuss any problems that might affect the balances at acquisition and
    a review of the prior year audit working papers, with their permission.
    Di Rollo was acquired two months into the financial year therefore its post-acquisition results should be expected to be
    material to the consolidated income statement.
    Goodwill acquired
    The assets and liabilities of Di Rollo at 31 March 2008 will be combined on a line-by-line basis into the consolidated financial
    statements of Murray and goodwill arising on acquisition recognised.
    Audit work on the fair value of the Di Rollo brand name at acquisition, $600,000, may include a review of a brand valuation
    specialist’s working papers and an assessment of the reasonableness of assumptions made.
    Significant items of plant are likely to have been independently valued prior to the acquisition. It may be appropriate to plan
    to place reliance on the work of expert valuers. The fair value adjustment on plant and equipment is very high (441% of
    carrying amount at the date of acquisition). This may suggest that Di Rollo’s depreciation policies are over-prudent (e.g. if
    accelerated depreciation allowed for tax purposes is accounted for under local GAAP).
    As the amount of goodwill is very material (approximately 50% of the cash consideration) it may be overstated if Murray has
    failed to recognise any assets acquired in the purchase of Di Rollo in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations. For
    example, Murray may have acquired intangible assets such as customer lists or franchises that should be recognised
    separately from goodwill and amortised (rather than tested for impairment).
    Subsequent impairment
    The audit plan should draw attention to the need to consider whether the Di Rollo brand name and goodwill arising have
    suffered impairment as a result of the allegations against Di Rollo’s former chief executive.
    Liabilities
    Proceedings in the legal claim made by Di Rollo’s former chief executive will need to be reviewed. If the case is not resolved
    at 31 March 2008, a contingent liability may require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements, depending on the
    materiality of amounts involved. Legal opinion on the likelihood of Di Rollo successfully defending the claim may be sought.
    Provision should be made for any actual liabilities, such as legal fees.
    Group (related party) transactions and balances
    A list of all the companies in the group (including any associates) should be included in group audit instructions to ensure
    that intra-group transactions and balances (and any unrealised profits and losses on transactions with associates) are
    identified for elimination on consolidation. Any transfer pricing policies (e.g. for clothes manufactured by Di Rollo for Murray
    and sales of Di Rollo’s accessories to Murray’s retail stores) must be ascertained and any provisions for unrealised profit
    eliminated on consolidation.
    It should be confirmed at the planning stage that inter-company transactions are identified as such in the accounting systems
    of all companies and that inter-company balances are regularly reconciled. (Problems are likely to arise if new inter-company
    balances are not identified/reconciled. In particular, exchange differences are to be expected.)
    Other auditors
    If Ross plans to use the work of other auditors in South America (rather than send its own staff to undertake the audit of Di
    Rollo), group instructions will need to be sent containing:
    – proforma statements;
    – a list of group and associated companies;
    – a statement of group accounting policies (see below);
    – the timetable for the preparation of the group accounts (see below);
    – a request for copies of management letters;
    – an audit work summary questionnaire or checklist;
    – contact details (of senior members of Ross’s audit team).
    Accounting policies
    Di Rollo may have material accounting policies which do not comply with the rest of the Murray group. As auditor to Di Rollo,
    Ross will be able to recalculate the effect of any non-compliance with a group accounting policy (that Murray’s management
    would be adjusting on consolidation).
    Timetable
    The timetable for the preparation of Murray’s consolidated financial statements should be agreed with management as soon
    as possible. Key dates should be planned for:
    – agreement of inter-company balances and transactions;
    – submission of proforma statements;
    – completion of the consolidation package;
    – tax review of group accounts;
    – completion of audit fieldwork by other auditors;
    – subsequent events review;
    – final clearance on accounts of subsidiaries;
    – Ross’s final clearance of consolidated financial statements.
    Tutorial note: The order of dates is illustrative rather than prescriptive.

  • 第10题:

    (b) (i) Explain the matters you should consider, and the evidence you would expect to find in respect of the

    carrying value of the cost of investment of Dylan Co in the financial statements of Rosie Co; and

    (7 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) Cost of investment on acquisition of Dylan Co
    Matters to consider
    According to the schedule provided by the client, the cost of investment comprises three elements. One matter to
    consider is whether the cost of investment is complete.
    It appears that no legal or professional fees have been included in the cost of investment (unless included within the
    heading ‘cash consideration’). Directly attributable costs should be included per IFRS 3 Business Combinations, and
    there is a risk that these costs may be expensed in error, leading to understatement of the investment.
    The cash consideration of $2·5 million is the least problematical component. The only matter to consider is whether the
    cash has actually been paid. Given that Dylan Co was acquired in the last month of the financial year it is possible that
    the amount had not been paid before the year end, in which case the amount should be recognised as a current liability
    on the statement of financial position (balance sheet). However, this seems unlikely given that normally control of an
    acquired company only passes to the acquirer on cash payment.
    IFRS 3 states that the cost of investment should be recognised at fair value, which means that deferred consideration
    should be discounted to present value at the date of acquisition. If the consideration payable on 31 January 2009 has
    not been discounted, the cost of investment, and the corresponding liability, will be overstated. It is possible that the
    impact of discounting the $1·5 million payable one year after acquisition would be immaterial to the financial
    statements, in which case it would be acceptable to leave the consideration at face value within the cost of investment.
    Contingent consideration should be accrued if it is probable to be paid. Here the amount is payable if revenue growth
    targets are achieved over the next four years. The auditor must therefore assess the probability of the targets being
    achieved, using forecasts and projections of Maxwell Co’s revenue. Such information is inherently subjective, and could
    have been manipulated, if prepared by the vendor of Maxwell Co, in order to secure the deal and maximise
    consideration. Here it will be crucial to be sceptical when reviewing the forecasts, and the assumptions underlying the
    data. The management of Rosie Co should have reached their own opinion on the probability of paying the contingent
    consideration, but they may have relied heavily on information provided at the time of the acquisition.
    Audit evidence
    – Agreement of the monetary value and payment dates of the consideration per the client schedule to legal
    documentation signed by vendor and acquirer.
    – Agreement of $2·5 million paid to Rosie Co’s bank statement and cash book prior to year end. If payment occurs
    after year end confirm that a current liability is recognised on the individual company and consolidated statement
    of financial position (balance sheet).
    – Board minutes approving the payment.
    – Recomputation of discounting calculations applied to deferred and contingent consideration.
    – Agreement that the discount rate used is pre-tax, and reflects current market assessment of the time value of money
    (e.g. by comparison to Rosie Co’s weighted average cost of capital).
    – Revenue and profit projections for the period until January 2012, checked for arithmetic accuracy.
    – A review of assumptions used in the projections, and agreement that the assumptions are comparable with the
    auditor’s understanding of Dylan Co’s business.
    Tutorial note: As the scenario states that Chien & Co has audited Dylan Co for several years, it is reasonable to rely on
    their cumulative knowledge and understanding of the business in auditing the revenue projections.

  • 第11题:

    哪些句子回答How’s it going? /What’s up?/What’s happening? ()

    A、I'm fine, thank you.

    B、Nothing much.

    C、I've been fine, thank you.

    D、Same as usual.


    参考答案:BD

  • 第12题:

    I have reviewed the fine print on the contract, and I can see that pet damage is not covered. However, this is not what Maureen told me when I bought the sofa. I feel I was ( ) about the terms of the warranty. I accept responsibility for not reading the full contract, but I trusted that I was being given all the facts.
    I would like Arcish Furniture to fix my couch. I await your response.
    Sincerely,
    Marcel Boule

    A. misrepresented

    B. misspelled

    C. misled

    D. mistaken

    答案:C
    解析:

  • 第13题:

    4 All organisations require trained employees. However, training can take many forms, some of which are internal to the organisation.

    Required:

    Explain what is meant by the terms:

    (a) Computer based training. (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    4 All organisations need appropriately trained employees. Due to the nature of modern business, especially the professions, much of this training is internal and often on a one to one basis. Accountants as managers should therefore be able to understand the different approaches to training and which of them is the most appropriate and cost effective for the training requirements of the organisation.
    (a) Computer based training can be inexpensive and is based upon user friendly interactive computer programs designed to enable trainees to train on their own and at their own pace.

  • 第14题:

    (b) Explain what is meant by McGregor’s

    (i) Theory X; (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Douglas McGregor has suggested that the managers’ view of the individuals’ attitude to work can be divided into two categories, which he called Theory X and Theory Y. The style. of management adopted will stem from the view taken as to how subordinates behave. However, these two typologies are not distinct; they do in fact represent the two ends of a continuum.
    (i) Theory X is based on traditional organisational thinking. It assumes that the average person is basically indolent and has an inherent dislike of work which should be avoided at all costs. The individual lacks ambition, shuns responsibility, has no ambition and is resistant to change. This theory holds that the individual seeks only security and is driven solely by self-interest. It follows that because of this dislike of work, most have to be directed, controlled, organised or coerced. Management is based on fear and punishment and will have an exploitative or authoritarian style. This reflects the thinking of the classical school of management, based on a scientific approach, specialisation, standardisation and obedience to superiors.

  • 第15题:

    4 (a) Explain the meaning of the term ‘working capital cycle’ for a trading company. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (a) The working capital cycle illustrates the changing make-up of working capital in the course of the trading operations of a
    business:
    1 Purchases are made on credit and the goods go into inventory.
    2 Inventory is sold and converted into receivables
    3 Credit customers pay their accounts
    4 Cash is used to pay suppliers.

  • 第16题:

    (c) Explain what ‘fiduciary responsibility’ means and construct the case for broadening the football club board’s

    fiduciary responsibility in this case. (7 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) Fiduciary responsibility
    Definition of ‘fiduciary responsibility’
    A fiduciary responsibility is a duty of trust and care towards one or more constituencies. It describes direction of accountability
    in that one party has a fiduciary duty to another. In terms of the case, the question refers to whose interests the directors of
    the football club should act in. Traditionally, the fiduciary duty of directors in public companies is to act in the economic
    interests of shareholders who invest in the company but are unable to manage the company directly. The case raises a number
    of issues concerning broadening the fiduciary duties of the directors of the football club with regard to the building of the new
    stadium, to other stakeholder groups.
    The case for extending fiduciary responsibility
    Although the primary fiduciary duty of directors in large public companies will be to shareholders, directors in businesses such
    as the football club described in the case may have good reason to broaden their views on fiduciary responsibility. This would
    involve taking into account, and acting in the interests of, the local wildlife centre, the residents, the school, the local
    government authority and the fans. The stakeholders in the case are not in agreement on the outcome for the new stadium
    and the club will need to privilege some stakeholders over others, which is a common situation whenever a proposal involving
    multiple impacts is considered. The specific arguments for broadening the fiduciary duties in this case include the following:
    Such an acceptance of claims made on the football club would clearly demonstrate that the club values the community of
    which it considers itself a part.
    It would help to maintain and manage its local reputation, which is important in progressing the stadium project.
    To broaden the fiduciary responsibility in this case would be to an important part of the risk management strategy, especially
    with regard to risks that could arise from the actions of local stakeholders.
    It could be argued that there is a moral case for all organisations to include other stakeholders’ claims in their strategies as it
    enfranchises and captures the views of those affected by an organisation’s policies and actions.

  • 第17题:

    (c) Define ‘retirement by rotation’ and explain its importance in the context of Rosh and Company.

    (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) Retirement by rotation.
    Definition
    Retirement by rotation is an arrangement in a director’s contract that specifies his or her contract to be limited to a specific
    period (typically three years) after which he or she must retire from the board or offer himself (being eligible) for re-election.
    The director must be actively re-elected back onto the board to serve another term. The default is that the director retires
    unless re-elected.
    Importance of
    Retirement by rotation reduces the cost of contract termination for underperforming directors. They can simply not be
    re-elected after their term of office expires and they will be required to leave the service of the board as a retiree (depending
    on contract terms).
    It encourages directors’ performance (they know they are assessed by shareholders and reconsidered every three years) and
    focuses their minds upon the importance of meeting objectives in line with shareholders’ aims.
    It is an opportunity, over time, to replace the board membership whilst maintaining medium term stability of membership
    (one or two at a time).
    Applied to Rosh
    Retirement by rotation would enable the board of Rosh to be changed over time. There is evidence that some directors may
    have stayed longer than is ideal because of links with other board members going back many years.

  • 第18题:

    (b) Explain the major benefits of pursuing a policy of internal development. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) The major benefits of pursuing a policy of internal development that may accrue to Taliesin Ltd are as follows:
    – By confining their activities to its internal environment the company avoids the need to manage the integration of
    businesses which is necessitated by an acquisition. Management teams, when considering the acquisition of another
    organisation, very often underestimate the costs of integration.
    – There is no need for the board of directors of Taliesin Ltd to familiarise itself with different organisational and national
    cultures, values etc, thereby avoiding many potential problems.
    – The board of directors of Taliesin Ltd is better able to control the activities of the business and the need for more complex
    supply chains and strategic alliances with foreign organisations is rendered unnecessary.
    – All investments are made at market price whereas if the board of directors was to attempt to grow the business
    acquisition then significant outlays would probably be made in respect of purchased goodwill.
    – As the organisation develops and expands, staff are provided with development and learning activities that may
    precipitate an increase in the level of their commitment to the organisation.

  • 第19题:

    (b) Explain the corporation tax and value added tax (VAT) implications of the following aspects of the proposed

    restructuring of the Rapier Ltd group.

    (i) The immediate tax implications of the restructuring. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) The tax implications of the proposed restructuring of the Rapier Ltd group
    (i) Immediate implications
    Corporation tax
    Rapier Ltd and its subsidiaries are in a capital gains group as Rapier Ltd owns at least 75% of the ordinary share capital
    of each of the subsidiary companies. Any non-exempt items of plant and machinery owned by the subsidiaries will
    therefore be transferred to Rapier Ltd at no gain, no loss.
    No taxable credit or allowable debit will arise on the transfer of the subsidiaries’ goodwill to Rapier Ltd because the
    companies are in a capital gains group.
    The trading losses brought forward in Dirk Ltd will be transferred with the trade to Rapier Ltd as the effective ownership
    of the three trades will not change (Rapier Ltd owns the subsidiaries which own the trades and, following the
    restructuring, will own the three trades directly). The losses will be restricted to being offset against the future trading
    profits of the Dirk trade only.
    There will be no balancing adjustments in respect of the plant and machinery transferred to Rapier Ltd. Writing down
    allowances will be claimed by the subsidiaries in respect of the year ending 30 June 2007 and by Rapier Ltd in respect
    of future periods.
    Value added tax (VAT)
    No VAT should be charged on the sales of the businesses to Rapier Ltd as they are outside the scope of VAT. This is
    because the trades are to be transferred as going concerns to a VAT registered person with no significant break in trading.
    Switch Ltd must notify HM Revenue and Customs by 30 July 2007 that it has ceased to make taxable supplies.

  • 第20题:

    4 (a) The purpose of ISA 250 Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements is to

    establish standards and provide guidance on the auditor’s responsibility to consider laws and regulations in an

    audit of financial statements.

    Explain the auditor’s responsibilities for reporting non-compliance that comes to the auditor’s attention

    during the conduct of an audit. (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    4 CLEEVES CO
    (a) Reporting non-compliance
    Non-compliance refers to acts of omission or commission by the entity being audited, either intentional or unintentional, that
    are contrary to the prevailing laws or regulations.
    To management
    Regarding non-compliance that comes to the auditor’s attention the auditor should, as soon as practicable, either:
    ■ communicate with those charged with governance; or
    ■ obtain audit evidence that they are appropriately informed.
    However, the auditor need not do so for matters that are clearly inconsequential or trivial and may reach agreement1 in
    advance on the nature of such matters to be communicated.
    If in the auditor’s judgment the non-compliance is believed to be intentional and material, the auditor should communicate
    the finding without delay.
    If the auditor suspects that members of senior management are involved in non-compliance, the auditor should report the
    matter to the next higher level of authority at the entity, if it exists (e.g. an audit committee or a supervisory board). Where
    no higher authority exists, or if the auditor believes that the report may not be acted upon or is unsure as to the person to
    whom to report, the auditor would consider seeking legal advice.
    To the users of the auditor’s report on the financial statements
    If the auditor concludes that the non-compliance has a material effect on the financial statements, and has not been properly
    reflected in the financial statements, the auditor expresses a qualified (i.e. ‘except for disagreement’) or an adverse opinion.
    If the auditor is precluded by the entity from obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence to evaluate whether or not noncompliance
    that may be material to the financial statements has (or is likely to have) occurred, the auditor should express a
    qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion on the financial statements on the basis of a limitation on the scope of the audit.
    Tutorial note: For example, if management denies the auditor access to information from which he would be able to assess
    whether or not illegal dumping had taken place (and, if so, the extent of it).
    If the auditor is unable to determine whether non-compliance has occurred because of limitations imposed by circumstances
    rather than by the entity, the auditor should consider the effect on the auditor’s report.
    Tutorial note: For example, if new legal requirements have been announced as effective but the detailed regulations are not
    yet published.
    To regulatory and enforcement authorities
    The auditor’s duty of confidentiality ordinarily precludes reporting non-compliance to a third party. However, in certain
    circumstances, that duty of confidentiality is overridden by statute, law or by courts of law (e.g. in some countries the auditor
    is required to report non-compliance by financial institutions to the supervisory authorities). The auditor may need to seek
    legal advice in such circumstances, giving due consideration to the auditor’s responsibility to the public interest.

  • 第21题:

    (b) (i) Explain the matters you should consider to determine whether capitalised development costs are

    appropriately recognised; and (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) Materiality
    The net book value of capitalised development costs represent 7% of total assets in 2007 (2006 – 7·7%), and is
    therefore material. The net book value has increased by 13%, a significant trend.
    The costs capitalised during the year amount to $750,000. If it was found that the development cost had been
    inappropriately capitalised, the cost should instead have been expensed. This would reduce profit before tax by
    $750,000, representing 42% of the year’s profit. This is highly material. It is therefore essential to gather sufficient
    evidence to support the assertion that development costs should be recognised as an asset.
    In 2007, $750,000 capitalised development costs have been incurred, when added to $160,000 research costs
    expensed, total research and development costs are $910,000 which represents 20·2% of total revenue, again
    indicating a high level of materiality for this class of transaction.
    Relevant accounting standard
    Development costs should only be capitalised as an intangible asset if the recognition criteria of IAS 38 Intangible Assets
    have been demonstrated in full:
    – Intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it
    – Technical feasibility and ability to use or sell
    – Ability to generate future economic benefit
    – Availability of technical, financial and other resources to complete
    – Ability to measure the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset.
    Research costs must be expensed, as should development costs which do not comply with the above criteria. The
    auditors must consider how Sci-Tech Co differentiates between research and development costs.
    There is risk that not all of the criteria have been demonstrated, especially due to the subjective nature of the
    development itself:
    – Pharmaceutical development is highly regulated. If the government does not license the product then the product
    cannot be sold, and economic benefits will therefore not be received.
    – Market research should justify the commercial viability of the product. The launch of a rival product to Flortex
    means that market share is likely to be much lower than anticipated, and the ability to sell Flortex is reduced. This
    could mean that Flortex will not generate an overall economic benefit if future sales will not recover the research
    and development costs already suffered, and yet to be suffered, prior to launch. The existence of the rival product
    could indicate that Flortex is no longer commercially viable, in which case the capitalised development costs
    relating to Flortex should be immediately expensed.
    – The funding on which development is dependent may be withdrawn, indicating that there are not adequate
    resources to complete the development of the products. Sci-Tech has failed to meet one of its required key
    performance indicators (KPI) in the year ended 30 November 2007, as products valued at 0·8% revenue have
    been donated to charity, whereas the required KPI is 1% revenue.
    Given that there is currently a breach of the target KPIs, this is likely to result in funding equivalent to 25% of
    research and development expenditure being withdrawn. If Sci-Tech Co is unable to source alternative means of
    finance, then it would seem that adequate resources may not be available to complete the development of new
    products.

  • 第22题:

    - It’s nice to meet you in my office. -()

    A、I am here today to discuss the trademark transfer with you.

    B、I want to tell you it is fine today.

    C、I only meant to help you.


    参考答案:A

  • 第23题:

    (a) List and explain FOUR methods of selecting a sample of items to test from a population in accordance with ISA 530 (Redrafted) Audit Sampling and Other Means of Testing. (4 marks)

    (b) List and explain FOUR assertions from ISA 500 Audit Evidence that relate to the recording of classes of

    transactions. (4 marks)

    (c) In terms of audit reports, explain the term ‘modified’. (2 marks)


    正确答案:
    (a)SamplingmethodsMethodsofsamplinginaccordancewithISA530AuditSamplingandOtherMeansofTesting:Randomselection.Ensureseachiteminapopulationhasanequalchanceofselection,forexamplebyusingrandomnumbertables.Systematicselection.Inwhichanumberofsamplingunitsinthepopulationisdividedbythesamplesizetogiveasamplinginterval.Haphazardselection.Theauditorselectsthesamplewithoutfollowingastructuredtechnique–theauditorwouldavoidanyconsciousbiasorpredictability.Sequenceorblock.Involvesselectingablock(s)ofcontinguousitemsfromwithinapopulation.Tutorialnote:Othermethodsofsamplingareasfollows:MonetaryUnitSampling.Thisselectionmethodensuresthateachindividual$1inthepopulationhasanequalchanceofbeingselected.Judgementalsampling.Selectingitemsbasedontheskillandjudgementoftheauditor.(b)Assertions–classesoftransactionsOccurrence.Thetransactionsandeventsthathavebeenrecordedhaveactuallyoccurredandpertaintotheentity.Completeness.Alltransactionsandeventsthatshouldhavebeenrecordedhavebeenrecorded.Accuracy.Theamountsandotherdatarelatingtorecordedtransactionsandeventshavebeenrecordedappropriately.Cut-off.Transactionsandeventshavebeenrecordedinthecorrectaccountingperiod.Classification.Transactionsandeventshavebeenrecordedintheproperaccounts.(c)AuditreporttermModified.Anauditormodifiesanauditreportinanysituationwhereitisinappropriatetoprovideanunmodifiedreport.Forexample,theauditormayprovideadditionalinformationinanemphasisofmatter(whichdoesnotaffecttheauditor’sopinion)orqualifytheauditreportforlimitationofscopeordisagreement.