(d) Job rotation. (3 marks)
第1题:
(b) Briefly describe the way in which a ‘person specification’ differs from a ‘job description’. (3 marks)
第2题:
(iii) delegation. (3 marks)
第3题:
(c) Briefly describe three advantages to Bailey’s of counselling. (3 marks)
第4题:
(iii) job enrichment. (5 marks)
第5题:
(ii) Analyse why moving to a ‘no frills’ low-cost strategy would be inappropriate for ONA.
Note: requirement (b) (ii) includes 3 professional marks (16 marks)
第6题:
(b) (i) Discusses the principles involved in accounting for claims made under the above warranty provision.
(6 marks)
(ii) Shows the accounting treatment for the above warranty provision under IAS37 ‘Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets’ for the year ended 31 October 2007. (3 marks)
Appropriateness of the format and presentation of the report and communication of advice. (2 marks)
(b) Provisions – IAS37
An entity must recognise a provision under IAS37 if, and only if:
(a) a present obligation (legal or constructive) has arisen as a result of a past event (the obligating event)
(b) it is probable (‘more likely than not’), that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle
the obligation
(c) the amount can be estimated reliably
An obligating event is an event that creates a legal or constructive obligation and, therefore, results in an enterprise having
no realistic alternative but to settle the obligation. A constructive obligation arises if past practice creates a valid expectation
on the part of a third party. If it is more likely than not that no present obligation exists, the enterprise should disclose a
contingent liability, unless the possibility of an outflow of resources is remote.
The amount recognised as a provision should be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation
at the balance sheet date, that is, the amount that an enterprise would rationally pay to settle the obligation at the balance
sheet date or to transfer it to a third party. This means provisions for large populations of events such as warranties, are
measured at a probability weighted expected value. In reaching its best estimate, the entity should take into account the risks
and uncertainties that surround the underlying events.
Expected cash outflows should be discounted to their present values, where the effect of the time value of money is material
using a risk adjusted rate (it should not reflect risks for which future cash flows have been adjusted). If some or all of the
expenditure required to settle a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, the reimbursement should be
recognised as a separate asset when, and only when, it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received if the entity
settles the obligation. The amount recognised should not exceed the amount of the provision. In measuring a provision future
events should be considered. The provision for the warranty claim will be determined by using the expected value method.
The past event which causes the obligation is the initial sale of the product with the warranty given at that time. It would be
appropriate for the company to make a provision for the Year 1 warranty of $280,000 and Year 2 warranty of $350,000,
which represents the best estimate of the obligation (see Appendix 2). Only if the insurance company have validated the
counter claim will Macaljoy be able to recognise the asset and income. Recovery has to be virtually certain. If it is virtually
certain, then Macaljoy may be able to recognise the asset. Generally contingent assets are never recognised, but disclosed
where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
The company could discount the provision if it was considered that the time value of money was material. The majority of
provisions will reverse in the short term (within two years) and, therefore, the effects of discounting are likely to be immaterial.
In this case, using the risk adjusted rate (IAS37), the provision would be reduced to $269,000 in Year 1 and $323,000 in
Year 2. The company will have to determine whether this is material.
Appendix 1
The accounting for the defined benefit plan is as follows:
第7题:
6 (a) Explain the term ‘money laundering’. (3 marks)
第8题:
某单道批处理系统中有四个作 JOBl、JOB2、JOB3、JOB4,它们到达“输入井”的时刻和所需要的运行时间如下表所示。
作业 进入系统时间 估计运行时间(分钟)
JOB1 8:30 80
JOB2 8:50 20
JOB3 9:20 40
JOB4 9:30 35
假设9:30开始作业调度,按照最高响应比作业优先算法,首先被调度的作业是______。
A.JOB1
B.JOB2
C.JOB3
D.JOB4
第9题:
设有一组作业,它们提交时刻和估计运行时间如下所示: 作业名 提交时刻 估计运行时间(分钟) Job1 10:00 50 Job2 10:10 30 Job3 10:30 10 Job4 10:50 5 在10:50 时刻开始进行作业调度,调度采用最高响应比优先算法,第一个被选中执行的作业是
A.Job1
B.Job2
C.Job3
D.Job4
第10题:
Examine the description of the MARKS table: STD_ID NUMBER(4) STUDENT_NAME VARCHAR2(30) SUBJ1 NUMBER(3) SUBJ2 NUMBER(3) SUBJ3 NUMBER(3) SUBJ1, SUBJ2, and SUBJ3 indicate the marks (grades) obtained by a student in the three subjects. Which two statements are valid? ()
第11题:
The statement executes successfully and returns the student ID and sum of all marks for each student who obtained more than the average mark in each subject.
The statement returns an error at the SELECT clause.
The statement returns an error at the WHERE clause.
The statement returns an error at the ORDER BY clause.
第12题:
SELECT SUM(subj1, subj2, subj3) FROM marks;
SELECT SUM(subj1 + subj2 + subj3) FROM marks;
SELECT SUM(subj1), SUM(subj2), SUM(subj3) FROM marks;
SELECT MAX(subj1, subj2, subj3) FROM marks;
SELECT MINIMUM(subj1) FROM marks;
SELECT COUNT(std_id) FROM marks WHERE subj1 >= AVG(subj1);
第13题:
(ii) authority; (3 marks)
第14题:
(e) Job instruction. (3 marks)
第15题:
(d) Explain to the management of Bailey’s why consideration should be given to resolving the problems through:
(i) job rotation; (5 marks)
第16题:
(iii) Lateral or horizontal. (3 marks)
第17题:
(ii) the strategy of the business regarding its treasury policies. (3 marks)
(Marks will be awarded in part (b) for the identification and discussion of relevant points and for the style. of the
report.)
第18题:
(iii) whether you agree or not with the statement of the production director. (3 marks)
第19题:
In relation to the law of contract, distinguish between and explain the effect of:
(a) a term and a mere representation; (3 marks)
(b) express and implied terms, paying particular regard to the circumstances under which terms may be implied in contracts. (7 marks)
This question requires candidates to consider the law relating to terms in contracts. It specifically requires the candidates to distinguish between terms and mere representations and then to establish the difference between express and implied terms in contracts.
(a) As the parties to a contract will be bound to perform. any promise they have contracted to undertake, it is important to distinguish between such statements that will be considered part of the contract, i.e. terms, and those other pre-contractual statements which are not considered to be part of the contract, i.e. mere representations. The reason for distinguishing between them is that there are different legal remedies available if either statement turns out to be incorrect.
A representation is a statement that induces a contract but does not become a term of the contract. In practice it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the two, but in attempting to do so the courts will focus on when the statement was made in relation to the eventual contract, the importance of the statement in relation to the contract and whether or not the party making the statement had specialist knowledge on which the other party relied (Oscar Chess v Williams (1957) and Dick
Bentley v Arnold Smith Motors (1965)).
(b) Express terms are statements actually made by one of the parties with the intention that they become part of the contract and
thus binding and enforceable through court action if necessary. It is this intention that distinguishes the contractual term from
the mere representation, which, although it may induce the contractual agreement, does not become a term of the contract.
Failure to comply with the former gives rise to an action for breach of contract, whilst failure to comply with the latter only gives rise to an action for misrepresentation.
Such express statements may be made by word of mouth or in writing as long as they are sufficiently clear for them to be enforceable. Thus in Scammel v Ouston (1941) Ouston had ordered a van from the claimant on the understanding that the balance of the purchase price was to be paid ‘on hire purchase terms over two years’. When Scammel failed to deliver the van Ouston sued for breach of contract without success, the court holding that the supposed terms of the contract were too
uncertain to be enforceable. There was no doubt that Ouston wanted the van on hire purchase but his difficulty was that
Scammel operated a range of hire purchase terms and the precise conditions of his proposed hire purchase agreement were
never sufficiently determined.
Implied terms, however, are not actually stated or expressly included in the contract, but are introduced into the contract by implication. In other words the exact meaning and thus the terms of the contract are inferred from its context. Implied terms can be divided into three types.
Terms implied by statute
In this instance a particular piece of legislation states that certain terms have to be taken as constituting part of an agreement, even where the contractual agreement between the parties is itself silent as to that particular provision. For example, under s.5 of the Partnership Act 1890, every member of an ordinary partnership has the implied power to bind the partnership in a contract within its usual sphere of business. That particular implied power can be removed or reduced by the partnership agreement and any such removal or reduction of authority would be effective as long as the other party was aware of it. Some implied terms, however, are completely prescriptive and cannot be removed.
Terms implied by custom or usage
An agreement may be subject to terms that are customarily found in such contracts within a particular market, trade or locality. Once again this is the case even where it is not actually specified by the parties. For example, in Hutton v Warren (1836), it was held that customary usage permitted a farm tenant to claim an allowance for seed and labour on quitting his tenancy. It should be noted, however, that custom cannot override the express terms of an agreement (Les Affreteurs Reunnis SA v Walford (1919)).
Terms implied by the courts Generally, it is a matter for the parties concerned to decide the terms of a contract, but on occasion the court will presume that the parties intended to include a term which is not expressly stated. They will do so where it is necessary to give business efficacy to the contract.
Whether a term may be implied can be decided on the basis of the officious bystander test. Imagine two parties, A and B, negotiating a contract, when a third party, C, interrupts to suggest a particular provision. A and B reply that that particular term is understood. In just such a way, the court will decide that a term should be implied into a contract.
In The Moorcock (1889), the appellants, owners of a wharf, contracted with the respondents to permit them to discharge their ship at the wharf. It was apparent to both parties that when the tide was out the ship would rest on the riverbed. When the tide was out, the ship sustained damage by settling on a ridge. It was held that there was an implied warranty in the contract that the place of anchorage should be safe for the ship. As a consequence, the ship owner was entitled to damages for breach of that term.
Alternatively the courts will imply certain terms into unspecific contracts where the parties have not reduced the general agreement into specific details. Thus in contracts of employment the courts have asserted the existence of implied terms to impose duties on both employers and employees, although such implied terms can be overridden by express contractual provision to the contrary.
第20题:
某单道批处理系统中有四个作业JOB1、JOB2、JOB3和JOB4,它们到达“输入井”的时刻和需要的运行时间如下表
假设9:30开始进行作业调度,按照最高响应比作业优先算法,首先被调度的作业是
A.JOB1
B.JOB2
C.JOB3
D.JOB4
第21题:
设有一组作业,它们的作业提交时刻及估计运行时间如下所示: 作业号 提交时刻 估计运行时间(分钟) Job1 8:30 70 Job2 9:10 30 Job3 9:30 15 Job4 9:50 5 在单道批处理方式下,采用短作业优先调度算法,作业的执行顺序为
A.Job1,Job4,Job3,Job2
B.Job1,Job3,Job4,Job2
C.Job4,Job3,Job2,Job1
D.Job4,Job1,Job2,Job3
第22题:
第23题: