(c) Describe the purposes for which a person specification might be used. (4 marks)
第1题:
(b) Describe the content of a reference. (5 marks)
第2题:
(iv) how these problems might be overcome. (4 marks)
第3题:
(c) Briefly describe three advantages to Bailey’s of counselling. (3 marks)
第4题:
4 A properly conducted appraisal interview is fundamental in ensuring the success of an organisation’s performance
appraisal system.
Required:
(a) Describe three approaches to conducting the appraisal interview. (5 marks)
第5题:
(ii) Describe the basis for the calculation of the provision for deferred taxation on first time adoption of IFRS
including the provision in the opening IFRS balance sheet. (4 marks)
第6题:
(ii) Describe the claim of each of the four identified stakeholders. (4 marks)
第7题:
(e) Briefly discuss FOUR initiatives that management might consider in order to further enhance profitability.
(4 marks)
第8题:
(ii) Suggest THREE other performance measures (not applied in (i)) which might be used to assess the
customer perspective of the balanced scorecard of GER. (3 marks)
第9题:
(b) Advise Maureen on deregistration for the purposes of value added tax (VAT) and any possible alternative
strategy. (8 marks)
An additional mark will be awarded for the effectiveness with which the information is communicated.
(1 mark)
第10题:
(c) The OECD’s Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) recommends preventative measures to be
taken by independent legal professionals and accountants (including sole practitioners, partners and employed
professionals within professional firms).
Required:
Describe FOUR measures that assist in preventing professional accountants from being used for money
laundering purposes. (8 marks)
第11题:
(b) Describe the potential benefits for Hugh Co in choosing to have a financial statement audit. (4 marks)
第12题:
Dynamic
Dialogue-driven
Philosophical
第13题:
(b) Describe five major barriers to good communication. (10 marks)
第14题:
(b) Describe the skills that a counsellor should possess. (14 marks)
第15题:
(b) Describe the advantages of external recruitment. (5 marks)
第16题:
Explain the grounds upon which a person may be disqualified under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.(10 marks)
The Company Directors Disqualification Act (CDDA) 1986 was introduced to control individuals who persistently abused the various privileges that accompany incorporation, most particularly the privilege of limited liability. The Act applies to more than just directors and the court may make an order preventing any person (without leave of the court) from being:
(i) a director of a company;
(ii) a liquidator or administrator of a company;
(iii) a receiver or manager of a company’s property; or
(iv) in any way, whether directly or indirectly, concerned with or taking part in the promotion, formation or management of a company.
The CDDA 1986 identifies three distinct categories of conduct, which may, and in some circumstances must, lead the court to disqualify certain persons from being involved in the management of companies.
(a) General misconduct in connection with companies
This first category involves the following:
(i) A conviction for an indictable offence in connection with the promotion, formation, management or liquidation of a company or with the receivership or management of a company’s property (s.2 of the CDDA 1986). The maximum period for disqualification under s.2 is five years where the order is made by a court of summary jurisdiction, and 15 years in any other case.
(ii) Persistent breaches of companies legislation in relation to provisions which require any return, account or other document to be filed with, or notice of any matter to be given to, the registrar (s.3 of the CDDA 1986). Section 3 provides that a person is conclusively proved to be persistently in default where it is shown that, in the five years ending with the date of the application, he has been adjudged guilty of three or more defaults (s.3(2) of the CDDA 1986). This is without prejudice to proof of persistent default in any other manner. The maximum period of disqualification under this section is five years.
(iii) Fraud in connection with winding up (s.4 of the CDDA 1986). A court may make a disqualification order if, in the course of the winding up of a company, it appears that a person:
(1) has been guilty of an offence for which he is liable under s.993 of the CA 2006, that is, that he has knowingly been a party to the carrying on of the business of the company either with the intention of defrauding the company’s creditors or any other person or for any other fraudulent purpose; or
(2) has otherwise been guilty, while an officer or liquidator of the company or receiver or manager of the property of the company, of any fraud in relation to the company or of any breach of his duty as such officer, liquidator, receiver or manager (s.4(1)(b) of the CDDA 1986).
The maximum period of disqualification under this category is 15 years.(b) Disqualification for unfitness
The second category covers:
(i) disqualification of directors of companies which have become insolvent, who are found by the court to be unfit to be directors (s.6 of the CDDA 1986). Under s. 6, the minimum period of disqualification is two years, up to a maximum of 15 years;
(ii) disqualification after investigation of a company under Pt XIV of the CA 1985 (it should be noted that this part of the previous Act still sets out the procedures for company investigations) (s.8 of the CDDA 1986). Once again, the maximum period of disqualification is 15 years.
Schedule 1 to the CDDA 1986 sets out certain particulars to which the court is to have regard in deciding whether a person’s conduct as a director makes them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company. In addition, the courts have given indications as to what sort of behaviour will render a person liable to be considered unfit to act as a company director. Thus, in Re Lo-Line Electric Motors Ltd (1988), it was stated that:
‘Ordinary commercial misjudgment is in itself not sufficient to justify disqualification. In the normal case, the conduct complained of must display a lack of commercial probity, although . . . in an extreme case of gross negligence or total incompetence, disqualification could be appropriate.’
(c) Other cases for disqualification
This third category relates to:
(i) participation in fraudulent or wrongful trading under s.213 of the Insolvency Act (IA)1986 (s.10 of the CDDA 1986);
(ii) undischarged bankrupts acting as directors (s.11 of the CDDA 1986); and
(iii) failure to pay under a county court administration order (s.12 of the CDDA 1986).
For the purposes of most of the CDDA 1986, the court has discretion to make a disqualification order. Where, however, a person has been found to be an unfit director of an insolvent company, the court has a duty to make a disqualification order (s.6 of the CDDA 1986). Anyone who acts in contravention of a disqualification order is liable:
(i) to imprisonment for up to two years and/or a fine, on conviction on indictment; or
(ii) to imprisonment for up to six months and/or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, on conviction summarily (s.13 of the CDDA 1986).
第17题:
(b) Using the TARA framework, construct four possible strategies for managing the risk presented by Product 2.
Your answer should describe each strategy and explain how each might be applied in the case.
(10 marks)
第18题:
(ii) Briefly discuss FOUR non-financial factors which might influence the above decision. (4 marks)
第19题:
(ii) Briefly explain the extent to which the application of sensitivity analysis might be useful in deciding
which refrigeration system to purchase and discuss the limitations inherent in its use. (3 marks)
第20题:
(iii) State any disadvantages to the relief in (i) that Sharon should be aware of, and identify and describe
another relief that she might use. (4 marks)
第21题:
(b) Describe the audit work to be performed in respect of the carrying amount of the following items in the
balance sheet of GVF as at 30 September 2005:
(i) goat herd; (4 marks)
第22题:
(ii) Describe the procedures to verify the number of serious accidents in the year ended 30 November 2007.
(4 marks)
第23题:
Electronic mail and filing permit a user to compose and transmit a message on an office(71)system. In the early 1970s, the ARPANET community developed a number of such systems which have been heavily used. Through standard message format(72), several hundred different computers and electronic mail interfaces are specification of how(73)and return addresses should appear on envelopes and which sizes are allowable for envelopes. In the electronic message world, they describe what(74)of characters are required at the(75)of a message to identify the sending and receiving mailboxes.
A.robotization
B.automation
C.dynamic
D.action