12 Which of the following statements are correct?(1) Contingent assets are included as assets in financial statements if it is probable that they will arise.(2) Contingent liabilities must be provided for in financial statements if it is probable that the

题目

12 Which of the following statements are correct?

(1) Contingent assets are included as assets in financial statements if it is probable that they will arise.

(2) Contingent liabilities must be provided for in financial statements if it is probable that they will arise.

(3) Details of all adjusting events after the balance sheet date must be given in notes to the financial statements.

(4) Material non-adjusting events are disclosed by note in the financial statements.

A 1 and 2

B 2 and 4

C 3 and 4

D 1 and 3


相似考题

1.John, CPA, is auditing the financial statements of Company A for the year ended December 31, 20×8. The un-audited information of selected financial statements items is as follows:(Expressed in RMB thousands)FINANCLAL STATEMENTS ITEMS20×820×7Sales6400048000Cost of sales5400042000Net profit30-20December 31, 20×8December 31, 20×7Inventory1600012000Current assets6000050000Total assets10000090000Current liabilities2000018000Total liabilities3000025000During the audit, John has the following findings:(1)On December 31, 20×8,Company A discounted an undue commercial acceptance bill (with recourse) amounted to RMB 6000000, and was charged discounting interest of RMB 180000 by the bank. Company A made an accounting entry on December 31, 20×8 as follows:Dr. Cash in Bank RMB 5820000Dr. Financial Expenses RMB 180000Cr. Notes Receivable RMB 6000000(2)In June 20×8, Company A provided guarantee for Company B’s borrowings from Bank C. In December 20×8, since Company B failed to repay the borrowings in time, Company A was sued by Bank C to make relevant repayment amounted to RMB 3000000. As at December 31, 20×8, the lawsuit was still pending, and, based on the reasonable estimate of the guarantee losses made by the management, Company A made an accounting entry as follows:Dr. Non-operating Expenses RMB 3000000Cr. Provisions RMB 3000000On January 10, 20×9,Company A received a judgment on repaying RMB 2500000to Bank C to settle the guarantee obligation. Company A made the payment and an accounting entry at the end of January 2009 as follows:Dr. Provisions RMB 3000000Cr. Cash in Bank RMB 2500000Cr. Non-operating Income RMB 500000Required:(1)For Revenue and Net Profit, explain which one is more appropriate to be used to calculate planning materiality for Company A’s 20×8 financial statements as a whole. Explain the reasons of that conclusion.(2)Based on the un-audited in formation of selected financial statements items, for the purpose of using analytical procedures as risk assessment procedures, calculate the following ratios:(a)Inventory Turnover Rate in 20×8;(b)Gross Profit Ratio in 20×8;(c)After Tax Return on Total Assets in 20×8; and(d)Current Ratio as at December 31, 20×8(3)For each audit finding identified during the audit, list the suggested adjusting entries that John should made for Company A’s 20×8 financial statements. Tax effects, if any, are ignored.

更多“12 Which of the following statements are correct?(1) Contingent assets are included as assets in financial statements if it is probable that they will arise.(2) Contingent liabilities must be provided for in financial statements if it is probable that the”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    18 Which of the following statements about accounting ratios and their interpretation are correct?

    1 A low-geared company is more able to survive a downturn in profit than a highly-geared company.

    2 If a company has a high price earnings ratio, this will often indicate that the market expects its profits to rise.

    3 All companies should try to achieve a current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) of 2:1.

    A 2 and 3 only

    B 1 and 3 only

    C 1 and 2 only

    D All three statements are correct


    正确答案:C

  • 第2题:

    (b) Discuss the relative costs to the preparer and benefits to the users of financial statements of increased

    disclosure of information in financial statements. (14 marks)

    Quality of discussion and reasoning. (2 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Increased information disclosure benefits users by reducing the likelihood that they will misallocate their capital. This is
    obviously a direct benefit to individual users of corporate reports. The disclosure reduces the risk of misallocation of capital
    by enabling users to improve their assessments of a company’s prospects. This creates three important results.
    (i) Users use information disclosed to increase their investment returns and by definition support the most profitable
    companies which are likely to be those that contribute most to economic growth. Thus, an important benefit of
    information disclosure is that it improves the effectiveness of the investment process.
    (ii) The second result lies in the effect on the liquidity of the capital markets. A more liquid market assists the effective
    allocation of capital by allowing users to reallocate their capital quickly. The degree of information asymmetry between
    the buyer and seller and the degree of uncertainty of the buyer and the seller will affect the liquidity of the market as
    lower asymmetry and less uncertainty will increase the number of transactions and make the market more liquid.
    Disclosure will affect uncertainty and information asymmetry.
    (iii) Information disclosure helps users understand the risk of a prospective investment. Without any information, the user
    has no way of assessing a company’s prospects. Information disclosure helps investors predict a company’s prospects.
    Getting a better understanding of the true risk could lower the price of capital for the company. It is difficult to prove
    however that the average cost of capital is lowered by information disclosure, even though it is logically and practically
    impossible to assess a company’s risk without relevant information. Lower capital costs promote investment, which can
    stimulate productivity and economic growth.
    However although increased information can benefit users, there are problems of understandability and information overload.
    Information disclosure provides a degree of protection to users. The benefit is fairness to users and is part of corporate
    accountability to society as a whole.
    The main costs to the preparer of financial statements are as follows:
    (i) the cost of developing and disseminating information,
    (ii) the cost of possible litigation attributable to information disclosure,
    (iii) the cost of competitive disadvantage attributable to disclosure.
    The costs of developing and disseminating the information include those of gathering, creating and auditing the information.
    Additional costs to the preparers include training costs, changes to systems (for example on moving to IFRS), and the more
    complex and the greater the information provided, the more it will cost the company.
    Although litigation costs are known to arise from information disclosure, it does not follow that all information disclosure leads
    to litigation costs. Cases can arise from insufficient disclosure and misleading disclosure. Only the latter is normally prompted
    by the presentation of information disclosure. Fuller disclosure could lead to lower costs of litigation as the stock market would
    have more realistic expectations of the company’s prospects and the discrepancy between the valuation implicit in the market
    price and the valuation based on a company’s financial statements would be lower. However, litigation costs do not
    necessarily increase with the extent of the disclosure. Increased disclosure could reduce litigation costs.
    Disclosure could weaken a company’s ability to generate future cash flows by aiding its competitors. The effect of disclosure
    on competitiveness involves benefits as well as costs. Competitive disadvantage could be created if disclosure is made relating
    to strategies, plans, (for example, planned product development, new market targeting) or information about operations (for
    example, production-cost figures). There is a significant difference between the purpose of disclosure to users and
    competitors. The purpose of disclosure to users is to help them to estimate the amount, timing, and certainty of future cash
    flows. Competitors are not trying to predict a company’s future cash flows, and information of use in that context is not
    necessarily of use in obtaining competitive advantage. Overlap between information designed to meet users’ needs and
    information designed to further the purposes of a competitor is often coincidental. Every company that could suffer competitive
    disadvantage from disclosure could gain competitive advantage from comparable disclosure by competitors. Published figures
    are often aggregated with little use to competitors.
    Companies bargain with suppliers and with customers, and information disclosure could give those parties an advantage in
    negotiations. In such cases, the advantage would be a cost for the disclosing entity. However, the cost would be offset
    whenever information disclosure was presented by both parties, each would receive an advantage and a disadvantage.
    There are other criteria to consider such as whether the information to be disclosed is about the company. This is both a
    benefit and a cost criterion. Users of corporate reports need company-specific data, and it is typically more costly to obtain
    and present information about matters external to the company. Additionally, consideration must be given as to whether the
    company is the best source for the information. It could be inefficient for a company to obtain or develop data that other, more
    expert parties could develop and present or do develop at present.
    There are many benefits to information disclosure and users have unmet information needs. It cannot be known with any
    certainty what the optimal disclosure level is for companies. Some companies through voluntary disclosure may have
    achieved their optimal level. There are no quantitative measures of how levels of disclosure stand with respect to optimal
    levels. Standard setters have to make such estimates as best they can, guided by prudence, and by what evidence of benefits
    and costs they can obtain.

  • 第3题:

    9 Which of the following items must be disclosed in a company’s published financial statements (including notes)

    if material, according to IAS1 Presentation of financial statements?

    1 Finance costs.

    2 Staff costs.

    3 Depreciation and amortisation expense.

    4 Movements on share capital.

    A 1 and 3 only

    B 1, 2 and 4 only

    C 2, 3 and 4 only

    D All four items


    正确答案:D

  • 第4题:

    19 Which of the following statements about intangible assets in company financial statements are correct according

    to international accounting standards?

    1 Internally generated goodwill should not be capitalised.

    2 Purchased goodwill should normally be amortised through the income statement.

    3 Development expenditure must be capitalised if certain conditions are met.

    A 1 and 3 only

    B 1 and 2 only

    C 2 and 3 only

    D All three statements are correct


    正确答案:A

  • 第5题:

    22 Which of the following statements about limited liability companies’ accounting is/are correct?

    1 A revaluation reserve arises when a non-current asset is sold at a profit.

    2 The authorised share capital of a company is the maximum nominal value of shares and loan notes the company

    may issue.

    3 The notes to the financial statements must contain details of all adjusting events as defined in IAS10 Events after

    the balance sheet date.

    A All three statements

    B 1 and 2 only

    C 2 and 3 only

    D None of the statements


    正确答案:D

  • 第6题:

    17 Which of the following statements are correct?

    (1) All non-current assets must be depreciated.

    (2) If goodwill is revalued, the revaluation surplus appears in the statement of changes in equity.

    (3) If a tangible non-current asset is revalued, all tangible assets of the same class should be revalued.

    (4) In a company’s published balance sheet, tangible assets and intangible assets must be shown separately.

    A 1 and 2

    B 2 and 3

    C 3 and 4

    D 1 and 4


    正确答案:C

  • 第7题:

    (b) Seymour offers health-related information services through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Aragon Co. Goodwill of

    $1·8 million recognised on the purchase of Aragon in October 2004 is not amortised but included at cost in the

    consolidated balance sheet. At 30 September 2006 Seymour’s investment in Aragon is shown at cost,

    $4·5 million, in its separate financial statements.

    Aragon’s draft financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 show a loss before taxation of

    $0·6 million (2005 – $0·5 million loss) and total assets of $4·9 million (2005 – $5·7 million). The notes to

    Aragon’s financial statements disclose that they have been prepared on a going concern basis that assumes that

    Seymour will continue to provide financial support. (7 marks)

    Required:

    For each of the above issues:

    (i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and

    (ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,

    in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Seymour Co for the year ended

    30 September 2006.

    NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.


    正确答案:
    (b) Goodwill
    (i) Matters
    ■ Cost of goodwill, $1·8 million, represents 3·4% consolidated total assets and is therefore material.
    Tutorial note: Any assessments of materiality of goodwill against amounts in Aragon’s financial statements are
    meaningless since goodwill only exists in the consolidated financial statements of Seymour.
    ■ It is correct that the goodwill is not being amortised (IFRS 3 Business Combinations). However, it should be tested
    at least annually for impairment, by management.
    ■ Aragon has incurred losses amounting to $1·1 million since it was acquired (two years ago). The write-off of this
    amount against goodwill in the consolidated financial statements would be material (being 61% cost of goodwill,
    8·3% PBT and 2·1% total assets).
    ■ The cost of the investment ($4·5 million) in Seymour’s separate financial statements will also be material and
    should be tested for impairment.
    ■ The fair value of net assets acquired was only $2·7 million ($4·5 million less $1·8 million). Therefore the fair
    value less costs to sell of Aragon on other than a going concern basis will be less than the carrying amount of the
    investment (i.e. the investment is impaired by at least the amount of goodwill recognised on acquisition).
    ■ In assessing recoverable amount, value in use (rather than fair value less costs to sell) is only relevant if the going
    concern assumption is appropriate for Aragon.
    ■ Supporting Aragon financially may result in Seymour being exposed to actual and/or contingent liabilities that
    should be provided for/disclosed in Seymour’s financial statements in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions,
    Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
    (ii) Audit evidence
    ■ Carrying values of cost of investment and goodwill arising on acquisition to prior year audit working papers and
    financial statements.
    ■ A copy of Aragon’s draft financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 showing loss for year.
    ■ Management’s impairment test of Seymour’s investment in Aragon and of the goodwill arising on consolidation at
    30 September 2006. That is a comparison of the present value of the future cash flows expected to be generated
    by Aragon (a cash-generating unit) compared with the cost of the investment (in Seymour’s separate financial
    statements).
    ■ Results of any impairment tests on Aragon’s assets extracted from Aragon’s working paper files.
    ■ Analytical procedures on future cash flows to confirm their reasonableness (e.g. by comparison with cash flows for
    the last two years).
    ■ Bank report for audit purposes for any guarantees supporting Aragon’s loan facilities.
    ■ A copy of Seymour’s ‘comfort letter’ confirming continuing financial support of Aragon for the foreseeable future.

  • 第8题:

    听力原文:M: There are several reasons why careful analysis of financial statements is necessary. What are they?

    W: First, financial statements are general-purpose statements. Secondly, the relationships between amounts on successive financial statements are not obvious without analysis. And thirdly, users of financial statements may be interested in seeing how well a company is performing.

    Q: What are they talking about?

    (17)

    A.The methods of financial statements.

    B.The necessity of careful analysis of financial statements

    C.The relationship among financial statements.

    D.The purpose of financial statements.


    正确答案:B
    解析:男士问的是仔细分析财务报表的必要性的理由,故B选项符合。D项说的是财务报表的目的,并非分析财务报表的目的。

  • 第9题:

    听力原文:M: Can you tell me something about a balance sheet?

    W: Yes. It is divided into three sections: assets, liabilities, and owner's equity and it is used to summarize a company's financial position on a given date.

    Q: Which of the following is not a section of a balance sheet?

    (15)

    A.Profit and Joss

    B.Owner's equity.

    C.Liabilities

    D.Assets.


    正确答案:A
    解析:根据女士回答资产负债表分为三部分,即"assets", "liabilities" 和"owner's equity",A项未提及。

  • 第10题:

    You are an audit manager at Rockwell & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. You are responsible for the audit of the Hopper Group, a listed audit client which supplies ingredients to the food and beverage industry worldwide.

    The audit work for the year ended 30 June 2015 is nearly complete, and you are reviewing the draft audit report which has been prepared by the audit senior. During the year the Hopper Group purchased a new subsidiary company, Seurat Sweeteners Co, which has expertise in the research and design of sugar alternatives. The draft financial statements of the Hopper Group for the year ended 30 June 2015 recognise profit before tax of $495 million (2014 – $462 million) and total assets of $4,617 million (2014: $4,751 million). An extract from the draft audit report is shown below:

    Basis of modified opinion (extract)

    In their calculation of goodwill on the acquisition of the new subsidiary, the directors have failed to recognise consideration which is contingent upon meeting certain development targets. The directors believe that it is unlikely that these targets will be met by the subsidiary company and, therefore, have not recorded the contingent consideration in the cost of the acquisition. They have disclosed this contingent liability fully in the notes to the financial statements. We do not feel that the directors’ treatment of the contingent consideration is correct and, therefore, do not believe that the criteria of the relevant standard have been met. If this is the case, it would be appropriate to adjust the goodwill balance in the statement of financial position.

    We believe that any required adjustment may materially affect the goodwill balance in the statement of financial position. Therefore, in our opinion, the financial statements do not give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Hopper Group and of the Hopper Group’s financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

    Emphasis of Matter Paragraph

    We draw attention to the note to the financial statements which describes the uncertainty relating to the contingent consideration described above. The note provides further information necessary to understand the potential implications of the contingency.

    Required:

    (a) Critically appraise the draft audit report of the Hopper Group for the year ended 30 June 2015, prepared by the audit senior.

    Note: You are NOT required to re-draft the extracts from the audit report. (10 marks)

    (b) The audit of the new subsidiary, Seurat Sweeteners Co, was performed by a different firm of auditors, Fish Associates. During your review of the communication from Fish Associates, you note that they were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence with regard to the breakdown of research expenses. The total of research costs expensed by Seurat Sweeteners Co during the year was $1·2 million. Fish Associates has issued a qualified audit opinion on the financial statements of Seurat Sweeteners Co due to this inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence.

    Required:

    Comment on the actions which Rockwell & Co should take as the auditor of the Hopper Group, and the implications for the auditor’s report on the Hopper Group financial statements. (6 marks)

    (c) Discuss the quality control procedures which should be carried out by Rockwell & Co prior to the audit report on the Hopper Group being issued. (4 marks)


    正确答案:

    (a) Critical appraisal of the draft audit report

    Type of opinion

    When an auditor issues an opinion expressing that the financial statements ‘do not give a true and fair view’, this represents an adverse opinion. The paragraph explaining the modification should, therefore, be titled ‘Basis of Adverse Opinion’ rather than simply ‘Basis of Modified Opinion’.

    An adverse opinion means that the auditor considers the misstatement to be material and pervasive to the financial statements of the Hopper Group. According to ISA 705 Modifications to Opinions in the Independent Auditor’s Report, pervasive matters are those which affect a substantial proportion of the financial statements or fundamentally affect the users’ understanding of the financial statements. It is unlikely that the failure to recognise contingent consideration is pervasive; the main effect would be to understate goodwill and liabilities. This would not be considered a substantial proportion of the financial statements, neither would it be fundamental to understanding the Hopper Group’s performance and position.

    However, there is also some uncertainty as to whether the matter is even material. If the matter is determined to be material but not pervasive, then a qualified opinion would be appropriate on the basis of a material misstatement. If the matter is not material, then no modification would be necessary to the audit opinion.

    Wording of opinion/report

    The auditor’s reference to ‘the acquisition of the new subsidiary’ is too vague; the Hopper Group may have purchased a number of subsidiaries which this phrase could relate to. It is important that the auditor provides adequate description of the event and in these circumstances it would be appropriate to name the subsidiary referred to.

    The auditor has not quantified the amount of the contingent element of the consideration. For the users to understand the potential implications of any necessary adjustments, they need to know how much the contingent consideration will be if it becomes payable. It is a requirement of ISA 705 that the auditor quantifies the financial effects of any misstatements, unless it is impracticable to do so.

    In addition to the above point, the auditor should provide more description of the financial effects of the misstatement, including full quantification of the effect of the required adjustment to the assets, liabilities, incomes, revenues and equity of the Hopper Group.

    The auditor should identify the note to the financial statements relevant to the contingent liability disclosure rather than just stating ‘in the note’. This will improve the understandability and usefulness of the contents of the audit report.

    The use of the term ‘we do not feel that the treatment is correct’ is too vague and not professional. While there may be some interpretation necessary when trying to apply financial reporting standards to unique circumstances, the expression used is ambiguous and may be interpreted as some form. of disclaimer by the auditor with regard to the correct accounting treatment. The auditor should clearly explain how the treatment applied in the financial statements has departed from the requirements of the relevant standard.

    Tutorial note: As an illustration to the above point, an appropriate wording would be: ‘Management has not recognised the acquisition-date fair value of contingent consideration as part of the consideration transferred in exchange for the acquiree, which constitutes a departure from International Financial Reporting Standards.’

    The ambiguity is compounded by the use of the phrase ‘if this is the case, it would be appropriate to adjust the goodwill’. This once again suggests that the correct treatment is uncertain and perhaps open to interpretation.

    If the auditor wishes to refer to a specific accounting standard they should refer to its full title. Therefore instead of referring to ‘the relevant standard’ they should refer to International Financial Reporting Standard 3 Business Combinations.

    The opinion paragraph requires an appropriate heading. In this case the auditors have issued an adverse opinion and the paragraph should be headed ‘Adverse Opinion’.

    As with the basis paragraph, the opinion paragraph lacks authority; suggesting that the required adjustments ‘may’ materially affect the financial statements implies that there is a degree of uncertainty. This is not the case; the amount of the contingent consideration will be disclosed in the relevant purchase agreement, so the auditor should be able to determine whether the required adjustments are material or not. Regardless, the sentence discussing whether the balance is material or not is not required in the audit report as to warrant inclusion in the report the matter must be considered material. The disclosure of the nature and financial effect of the misstatement in the basis paragraph is sufficient.

    Finally, the emphasis of matter paragraph should not be included in the audit report. An emphasis of matter paragraph is only used to draw attention to an uncertainty/matter of fundamental importance which is correctly accounted for and disclosed in the financial statements. An emphasis of matter is not required in this case for the following reasons:

    – Emphasis of matter is only required to highlight matters which the auditor believes are fundamental to the users’ understanding of the business. An example may be where a contingent liability exists which is so significant it could lead to the closure of the reporting entity. That is not the case with the Hopper Group; the contingent liability does not appear to be fundamental.

    – Emphasis of matter is only used for matters where the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate evidence that the matter is not materially misstated in the financial statements. If the financial statements are materially misstated, in this regard the matter would be fully disclosed by the auditor in the basis of qualified/adverse opinion paragraph and no emphasis of matter is necessary.

    (b) Communication from the component auditor

    The qualified opinion due to insufficient evidence may be a significant matter for the Hopper Group audit. While the possible adjustments relating to the current year may not be material to the Hopper Group, the inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence with regard to a material matter in Seurat Sweeteners Co’s financial statements may indicate a control deficiency which the auditor was not aware of at the planning stage and it could indicate potential problems with regard to the integrity of management, which could also indicate a potential fraud. It could also indicate an unwillingness of management to provide information, which could create problems for future audits, particularly if research and development costs increase in future years. If the group auditor suspects that any of these possibilities are true, they may need to reconsider their risk assessment and whether the audit procedures performed are still appropriate.

    If the detail provided in the communication from the component auditor is insufficient, the group auditor should first discuss the matter with the component auditor to see whether any further information can be provided. The group auditor can request further working papers from the component auditor if this is necessary. However, if Seurat Sweeteners has not been able to provide sufficient appropriate evidence, it is unlikely that this will be effective.

    If the discussions with the component auditor do not provide satisfactory responses to evaluate the potential impact on the Hopper Group, the group auditor may need to communicate with either the management of Seurat Sweeteners or the Hopper Group to obtain necessary clarification with regard to the matter.

    Following these procedures, the group auditor needs to determine whether they have sufficient appropriate evidence to draw reasonable conclusions on the Hopper Group’s financial statements. If they believe the lack of information presents a risk of material misstatement in the group financial statements, they can request that further audit procedures be performed, either by the component auditor or by themselves.

    Ultimately the group engagement partner has to evaluate the effect of the inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence on the audit opinion of the Hopper Group. The matter relates to research expenses totalling $1·2 million, which represents 0·2% of the profit for the year and 0·03% of the total assets of the Hopper Group. It is therefore not material to the Hopper Group’s financial statements. For this reason no modification to the audit report of the Hopper Group would be required as this does not represent a lack of sufficient appropriate evidence with regard to a matter which is material to the Group financial statements.

    Although this may not have an impact on the Hopper Group audit opinion, this may be something the group auditor wishes to bring to the attention of those charged with governance. This would be particularly likely if the group auditor believed that this could indicate some form. of fraud in Seurat Sweeteners Co, a serious deficiency in financial reporting controls or if this could create problems for accepting future audits due to management’s unwillingness to provide access to accounting records.

    (c) Quality control procedures prior to issuing the audit report

    ISA 220 Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements and ISQC 1 Quality Control for Firms that Perform. Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Agreements require that an engagement quality control reviewer shall be appointed for audits of financial statements of listed entities. The audit engagement partner then discusses significant matters arising during the audit engagement with the engagement quality control reviewer.

    The engagement quality control reviewer and the engagement partner should discuss the failure to recognise the contingent consideration and its impact on the auditor’s report. The engagement quality control reviewer must review the financial statements and the proposed auditor’s report, in particular focusing on the conclusions reached in formulating the auditor’s report and consideration of whether the proposed auditor’s opinion is appropriate. The audit documentation relating to the acquisition of Seurat Sweeteners Co will be carefully reviewed, and the reviewer is likely to consider whether procedures performed in relation to these balances were appropriate.

    Given the listed status of the Hopper Group, any modification to the auditor’s report will be scrutinised, and the firm must be sure of any decision to modify the report, and the type of modification made. Once the engagement quality control reviewer has considered the necessity of a modification, they should consider whether a qualified or an adverse opinion is appropriate in the circumstances. This is an important issue, given that it requires judgement as to whether the matters would be material or pervasive to the financial statements.

    The engagement quality control reviewer should ensure that there is adequate documentation regarding the judgements used in forming the final audit opinion, and that all necessary matters have been brought to the attention of those charged with governance.

    The auditor’s report must not be signed and dated until the completion of the engagement quality control review.

    Tutorial note: In the case of the Hopper Group’s audit, the lack of evidence in respect of research costs is unlikely to be discussed unless the audit engagement partner believes that the matter could be significant, for example, if they suspected the lack of evidence is being used to cover up a financial statements fraud.

  • 第11题:

    Financial institutions deal with financial assets,assets that promise future payments from financial contracts, such as securities and loans.These institutions also deliver services, relying on their reputations to attract customers for relationships ofte


    答案:
    解析:
    金融机构处理金融资产,这些资产是承诺未来收益的金融合同,如股票和贷款。这些机 构同样提供服务,这依赖于声誉吸引基于信任关系的客户。类似地,非金融企业期望未来的现 金形式的收益,或者来自其有形的服务产品或者来自可识别的商标品牌、某个生产过程的专利。 因为资产种类众多,将其分为两类比较方便:实物资产和金融资产。实物资产是那些基于基本质量提供收益的资产,一个人的家的价值与其建筑质量、所在位置和大小相关,一个公司的主 要的电脑提供的收益是基于其速度、内存大小、用途的便利以及维修的频率,而金融资产是能 从签署合约的团体手中收到未来承诺收益的合约。 与其他机构一样,金融机构需要并使用资产,以使得收益超过成本,金融机构和其他公司 最关键的不同是金融机构持有的大部分资产事金融资产。金融机构使用来自存款者的资金来获 取对他人的金融索取权。他们也许会将资金借给个人、企业或者政府,它们也会购买其他企业 的股权,金融机构期望的未来收益依赖于他们购买的金融负债所有者的绩效。金融机构和其他 公司的主要区别并不在于它们筹集资金的方式,因为所有企业都这样筹集金融负债.而在于他 们如何运用这比资金。

  • 第12题:

    单选题
    If the turbocharger of a four-stroke/cycle diesel engine fails to operate, which of the following statements best describes the probable effect?()
    A

    Intake manifold pressure will be high

    B

    Intake manifold pressure will be unaffected

    C

    Exhaust temperatures will be high

    D

    Exhaust temperatures will be low


    正确答案: C
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第13题:

    20 IAS 2 Inventories defines the extent to which overheads are included in the cost of inventories of finished goods.

    Which of the following statements about the IAS 2 requirements in this area are correct?

    1 Finished goods inventories may be valued on the basis of labour and materials cost only, without including overheads.

    2 Carriage inwards, but not carriage outwards, should be included in overheads when valuing inventories of finished goods.

    3 Factory management costs should be included in fixed overheads allocated to inventories of finished goods.

    A All three statements are correct

    B 1 and 2 only

    C 1 and 3 only

    D 2 and 3 only


    正确答案:D

  • 第14题:

    5 An enterprise has made a material change to an accounting policy in preparing its current financial statements.

    Which of the following disclosures are required by IAS 8 Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates

    and errors in these financial statements?

    1 The reasons for the change.

    2 The amount of the consequent adjustment in the current period and in comparative information for prior periods.

    3 An estimate of the effect of the change on future periods, where possible.

    A 1 and 2 only

    B 1 and 3 only

    C 2 and 3 only

    D All three items


    正确答案:A

  • 第15题:

    16 Which of the following statements about accounting concepts and conventions are correct?

    (1) The entity concept requires that a business is treated as being separate from its owners.

    (2) The use of historical cost accounting tends to understate assets and profit when prices are rising.

    (3) The prudence concept means that the lowest possible values should be applied to income and assets and the

    highest possible values to expenses and liabilities.

    (4) The money measurement concept means that only assets capable of being reliably measured in monetary terms

    can be included in the balance sheet of a business.

    A 1 and 2

    B 2 and 3

    C 3 and 4

    D 1 and 4


    正确答案:D

  • 第16题:

    21 Which of the following statements about contingent assets and contingent liabilities are correct?

    1 A contingent asset should be disclosed by note if an inflow of economic benefits is probable.

    2 A contingent liability should be disclosed by note if it is probable that a transfer of economic benefits to settle it

    will be required, with no provision being made.

    3 No disclosure is required for a contingent liability if it is not probable that a transfer of economic benefits to settle

    it will be required.

    4 No disclosure is required for either a contingent liability or a contingent asset if the likelihood of a payment or

    receipt is remote.

    A 1 and 4 only

    B 2 and 3 only

    C 2, 3 and 4

    D 1, 2 and 4


    正确答案:A

  • 第17题:

    8 Which of the following statements about accounting concepts and conventions are correct?

    (1) The money measurement concept requires all assets and liabilities to be accounted for at historical cost.

    (2) The substance over form. convention means that the economic substance of a transaction should be reflected in

    the financial statements, not necessarily its legal form.

    (3) The realisation concept means that profits or gains cannot normally be recognised in the income statement until

    realised.

    (4) The application of the prudence concept means that assets must be understated and liabilities must be overstated

    in preparing financial statements.

    A 1 and 3

    B 2 and 3

    C 2 and 4

    D 1 and 4.


    正确答案:B

  • 第18题:

    21 Which of the following items must be disclosed in a company’s published financial statements?

    1 Authorised share capital

    2 Movements in reserves

    3 Finance costs

    4 Movements in non-current assets

    A 1, 2 and 3 only

    B 1, 2 and 4 only

    C 2, 3 and 4 only

    D All four items


    正确答案:D

  • 第19题:

    (c) With specific reference to Hugh Co, discuss the objective of a review engagement and contrast the level of

    assurance provided with that provided in an audit of financial statements. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) The objective of a review engagement is to enable the auditor to obtain moderate assurance as to whether the financial
    statements have been prepared in accordance with an identified financial reporting framework. This is defined in ISRE 2400
    Engagements to Review Financial Statements.
    In order to obtain this assurance, it is necessary to gather evidence using analytical procedures and enquiries with
    management. Detailed substantive procedures will not be performed unless the auditor has reason to believe that the
    information may be materially misstated.
    The auditor should approach the engagement with a high degree of professional scepticism, looking for circumstances that
    may cause the financial statements to be misstated. For example, in Hugh Co, the fact that the preparer of the financial
    statements is part-qualified may lead the auditor to believe that there is a high inherent risk that the figures are misstated.
    As a result of procedures performed, the auditor’s objective is to provide a clear written expression of negative assurance on
    the financial statements. In a review engagement the auditor would state that ‘we are not aware of any material modifications
    that should be made to the financial statements….’
    This is normally referred to as an opinion of ‘negative assurance’.
    Negative assurance means that the auditor has performed limited procedures and has concluded that the financial statements
    appear reasonable. The user of the financial statements gains some comfort that the figures have been subject to review, but
    only a moderate level of assurance is provided. The user may need to carry out additional procedures of their own if they
    want to rely on the financial statements. For example, if Hugh Co were to use the financial statements as a means to raise
    further bank finance, the bank would presumably perform, or require Hugh Co to perform, additional procedures to provide
    a higher level of assurance as to the validity of the figures contained in the financial statements.
    In comparison, in an audit, a high level of assurance is provided. The auditors provide an opinion of positive, but not absolute
    assurance. The user is assured that the figures are free from material misstatement and that the auditor has based the opinion
    on detailed procedures.

  • 第20题:

    Why might a taxpayer elect to depreciate assets using the Alternative Depreciation System (ADS)?()I. The taxpayer desires rapid write off of assets.II. The taxpayer may be close to being subject to the alternative minimum tax.III. The taxpayer is experiencing a low income time period.

    A、Statements I and III are correct

    B、Only statement I is correct

    C、Statements II and III are correct

    D、Statements I and II are correct

    E、Statements I, II, and III are correct


    答案:E

  • 第21题:

    What is the stable-monetary-unit concept?

    A.It is the prime means of measuring assets.

    B.It is the common denominator in business transactions.

    C.It is an orderly basis for handling account balances to produce the financial statements.

    D.It is monetary terms in accounting information.


    正确答案:C
    解析:文章第一段最后一句提到The stable—monetary—unit concept provides…produce the financial statements.货币计量单位的理念,使处理账户余额,生成财务报表能够有序进行。

  • 第22题:

    Under certain circumstances, profits made on transactions between members of a group need to be eliminated from the consolidated financial statements under IFRS.

    Which of the following statements about intra-group profits in consolidated financial statements is/are correct?

    (i) The profit made by a parent on the sale of goods to a subsidiary is only realised when the subsidiary sells the goods to a third party

    (ii) Eliminating intra-group unrealised profits never affects non-controlling interests

    (iii) The profit element of goods supplied by the parent to an associate and held in year-end inventory must be eliminated in full

    A.(i) only

    B.(i) and (ii)

    C.(ii) and (iii)

    D.(iii) only


    正确答案:A

    (i) is the only correct elimination required by IFRS.

  • 第23题:

    会计报表(Financial Statements)


    正确答案: 是会计报告的核心内容,也称财务报表。是指综合反映企业某一特定日期资产、负债和所有者权益及其结构情况,某一特定时期经营成果的实现及分配情况和某一特定时期先紧流入、现金流出及净增加情况的书面文件。它有主表和相关的附表组成,其中主表包括资产负债表、利润表和现金流量表,附表包括资产减值准备明细表、利润分配表等。全面反映企业在一定时期内经营成果、现金流量和截止时点的财务状况的报告文件。